Math
21%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Charter high school
Excelsior Charter
The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
44% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 21% in math. 90.5% graduate in four years. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Building Momentum
What this means for your family
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
44%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
2,170Total enrollment
Graduation
90.5%Four-year graduation rate
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grade 11 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 14% | 57% |
| 2022 | 13% | 47% |
| 2023 | 12% | 48% |
| 2024 | 11% | 45% |
| 2025 | 21% | 44% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
8%ProficientStandard Met
13%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
20%MinimalStandard Not Met
60%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
17%ProficientStandard Met
27%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
29%MinimalStandard Not Met
27%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Has stayed near the 19th percentile since 2019.
Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Excelsior Charter deserves a closer read. Two-thirds of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 1.4% chronic absenteeism — versus 23.1% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
As a charter, Excelsior Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
1204 tested · 1 of 1 grade published
Excelsior Charter scores 42 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 19th percentile of 1,647 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 32% meet the standard today, versus 35% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
Percentile among 1,647 high schools statewide
ELAOrange(Maintained)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 34% | 28% | 35% | 34% | 36% |
| Grade 8 | 35% | 25% | 29% | 32% | 33% |
| Grade 11 | 57% | 47% | 48% | 45% | 44% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 20% | 11% | 16% | 19% | 28% |
| Grade 8 | 19% | 9% | 10% | 15% | 19% |
| Grade 11 | 14% | 13% | 12% | 11% | 21% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
One in four of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.
ELA37% met or exceeded
Exceeded 11%Met 26%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 36%
Math23% met or exceeded
Exceeded 11%Met 12%Nearly Met 22%Not Met 55%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California high schools · average20% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 42 | 12% | 32% | 90.5% | 2.8% | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| CA average · High School | 54 | 20% | 43% | 92.5% | 43.0% | 23.1% | 3.3% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope4254
% Exceeded12%20%
% Met+32%43%
Grad rate90.5%92.5%
College readiness2.8%43.0%
Absence1.4%23.1%
Suspension2.5%3.3%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model places it near the 25th percentile of high schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California high schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California high school lands at −3 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −13 and +5 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 17th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.17th pctile · −10 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −5 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 33rd percentile of 7,518 reported schools.33rd pctile · −5 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Excelsior Charter in Victorville, 32.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 5.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Excelsior Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 949 students tested.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 30% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 30%, district —, state 43%30%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 3%, state 32%27% · −3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 4%, state 32%29% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 32%, district 3%, state 44%32% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 27%, district 4%, state 42%27% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 33%, district 11%, state 56%33% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 2%, state 15%12% · −18 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 25%, district 2%, state 26%25% · −5 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 0%, state 11%10% · −20 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 32%, district —, state 56%32% · +2 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 21%, district 10%, state 22%21% · −9 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 38%, district —, state 46%38% · +9 vs school
5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California high school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
Low-income students505 studentsLow-income students, reading: −9 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California high school, 505 students.−9 pts · −4 vs typical
English Only501 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 501 students.−11 pts · −8 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students407 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −7 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 407 students.−7 pts · −4 vs typical
White120 studentsWhite, reading: −27 scale-score points versus expectation, against −4 for the same group at a typical California high school, 120 students.−27 pts · −23 vs typical
Students with disabilities109 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California high school, 109 students.−8 pts · +7 vs typical
Math
Low-income students505 studentsLow-income students, math: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California high school, 505 students.−2 pts · +13 vs typical
English Only500 studentsEnglish Only, math: −5 scale-score points versus expectation, against −12 for the same group at a typical California high school, 500 students.−5 pts · +7 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students409 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California high school, 409 students.0 pts · +13 vs typical
White119 studentsWhite, math: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California high school, 119 students.−15 pts · −7 vs typical
Students with disabilities110 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −9 for the same group at a typical California high school, 110 students.−13 pts · −4 vs typical
this school typical California high school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Where graduates go
What happens after high school?
55%
Enrolled in college within a year
Class of 2023 · 198 of 362 completers · includes community colleges
362Completers
15%
Other colleges54 completers · Outside the California community college system
40%
California community colleges144 completers · Enrolled within a year
45%
Not recorded enrolled164 completers · No college enrollment in this reporting window
Destination data describes this earlier graduating class, separately from current-year test results and graduation. Percentages are rounded.
College destinations and the full graduate record
Where graduates go · 2024–25
Where graduates go
Context — never part of the Scope Score
55%
College-going rate, class of 2023
Where they went after graduation
Of Excelsior Charter's class of 2023, 55% enrolled in college somewhere within a year — a CSU, a community college, a UC, or out of state.
College destination mix, class of 2023
Class of 2023: 362 completers, 55% enrolled somewhere within a year
40%
45%
University of California 7 (2%)California State University 8 (2%)California community college 144 (40%)In-state private 11 (3%)Out-of-state, 4-year 28 (8%)Out-of-state, 2-year 0 (0%)Not enrolled 164 (45%)
Percentages are computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers) from CDE-reported counts, not a CDE-native rate. Data source: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort — the newest published; National Student Clearinghouse match.
UC application funnel — one destination of six, tracked in detail because UC is the only source with 30 years of history
In fall 2025, 6 of Excelsior Charter's 335 graduates enrolled in the University of California system.
Applied17fall 2025, universitywide
Admitted14
Enrolled6
ShowHide the UC campus list and the 2015–2025 trend
Where they landed (fall 2025)
7 of 7 campuses are masked below UC's privacy floor — a protection, not a verdict.
Campuses never sum to the universitywide figure — students apply to several.
UC enrollees, universitywide, 2015–2025
Peak: 15 enrolled, 2020
UC publishes this trend back to 1994 — no other destination has a comparable multi-year record.
UC is one road of many — the full destination mix for the class of 2023 is below. And who applied isn't who the school taught: the ratio between the two reflects the self-selected pool of students who chose to apply, not what happened in the classroom. By the state's 2023 count, 55% of this class's predecessors enrolled in college somewhere within a year. More of the class of 2023 enrolled at community colleges (144) than at UC (7).
Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle · college-going rate: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 23 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher23 · district 19
Teaching staff104 teachers
Avg. experience8.6 years
Fully credentialed52%
First-year teachers7%
Intern / emergency permit11.4%
PrincipalDerek King
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$62,055 – $132,536
Principal salary$175,716 – $175,716
Superintendent salary$372,911
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Course breadth
AP exam qualifiers4 studentsCCI, participation not authorization
CTE pathway completers48 students
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 1.4%, district 21.9%, state 23.1%1.4% · −21.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.5%, district —, state 3.3%2.5% · −0.8pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2016–17
Its district spends $75,731 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $75,731, CA average $14,491$75,731 · district average
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 36%Instruction support 27%Student services 17%Administration 17%Buildings & maintenance 3%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2017 — the newest published
2017$75,731 per pupil
2016$70,347 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino60.7% · district 69.3% · CA 56.1%
White23.0% · district 13.4% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.7% · district 1.3% · CA 10.2%
Black9.0% · district 9.9% · CA 4.8%
Other6.5% · district 6.0% · CA 9.0%
GenderFemale 49.6% · Male 49.9% · Non-binary 0.6%
Free or reduced lunch72.3% · CA 64%
Median income$62K · CA $85K
Median home value$375K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population47,375
Median age34 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · high schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excelsior Charter | Charter | Needs Support | 12% | 32% | School being viewed | |
| Lakeview Leadership Academy | Public | Developing | 10% | 38% | 0.8 mi | |
| Alta Vista Innovation Highalternative comparison group | Charter | Needs Support | 4% | 16% | 1.8 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
5 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check enrollment with this charter school
Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.
School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
No school established for this stage.
High school · 9–12
Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Charter enrollment details
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Excelsior Charter a good high school?
Excelsior Charter has a Scope Score of 42 out of 100, placing it in the 19th percentile of California high schools and ranked #1,337 statewide. 12.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.7 percentage points below the California average of 19.8%. The Scope Score weights 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate (25%), exceeded standard (22%), college/career readiness (20%), met or exceeded (proficient) (18%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Excelsior Charter's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.3% of students at Excelsior Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.1% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 684 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Excelsior Charter rank in California?
Excelsior Charter ranks #1,337 among California high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 19th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Excelsior Charter?
1.4% of students at Excelsior Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 23.1%. The suspension rate is 2.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Excelsior Charter compare to other schools in Victorville?
Excelsior Charter scores 42/100 (19th percentile) among California high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 2,170 students. Use the schools in Victorville page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.
How does Excelsior Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Excelsior Charter in Victorville, 32.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 5.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Excelsior Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 949 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
How many students from Excelsior Charter go to UC?
In fall 2025, 6 Excelsior Charter graduates enrolled at University of California campuses, universitywide. That figure can't be split into a per-campus sum — students apply to several UC campuses at once, so campus-level counts don't add up to the universitywide total. UC is one destination among many: this says nothing about graduates who chose a CSU, a private college, a community college, or work, and it is a count, not a rate or a ranking. Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
Attendance carries this score. The test levels sit just under the state's.
1.4% chronic absenteeism — versus 23.1% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 90.5% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 12.1% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 2.8% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 32.3% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 1.4% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 2.5% | 3.3% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures graduation, test performance, college readiness, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Excelsior Charter: reading the evidence
Excelsior Charter posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Excelsior Charter is ranked #1,337 statewide · #2 of 3 in San Bernardino County Office of Educatio.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 90.5% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 12.1% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 2.8% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 32.3% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 1.4% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 2.5% | 3.3% | 5% |
- Graduation rate
- ↓ vs CA 92.5% · index 54 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 19.8% · index 46 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- College readiness
- ↓ vs CA 43.0% · index 32 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 43.2% · index 47 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 23.1% · index 73 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 1.4pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 3.3% · index 55 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 431 | 9% | 27% | 23% | 41% | 36% | −12 |
| Grade 8 | 430 | 8% | 25% | 29% | 38% | 33% | −13 |
| Grade 11 | 343 | 17% | 27% | 29% | 27% | 44% | −5 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 434 | 16% | 12% | 22% | 50% | 28% | −6 |
| Grade 8 | 428 | 8% | 11% | 24% | 57% | 19% | −13 |
| Grade 11 | 341 | 8% | 13% | 20% | 60% | 21% | −3 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 793 | 3% | 17% | 67% | 13% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 949 | 32.1% | +27 | −6 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 740 | 35.5% | +29 | −3 |
| White | 250 | 42.4% | +22 | −19 |
03Nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excelsior Charter ← | — | 42 | 12.1% | 32.3% | 2.5% |
| Lakeview Leadership Academy | 0.8 mi | 46 | 9.5% | 38.1% | 8.3% |
| California average | — | 54 | 19.8% | 43.2% | 3.3% |
| Alta Vista Innovation Highscored within its class, not statewide | 1.8 mi | 10 | 4.2% | 15.7% | 0.2% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Graduation Rate
90.5%
AP Exam Prepared
2.8%
A-G Completion
26.6%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
54.7%
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 43 | 18 | #1239 | 10.3% | 35.3% | 5.3% | 0.7% |
| 2022 | 42 | 22 | #1253 | 10.7% | 30.1% | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| 2023 | 42 | 18 | #1339 | 9.2% | 29.9% | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| 2024 | 40 | 16 | #1386 | 8.3% | 27.9% | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| 2025 | 42 | 19 | #1337 | 12.1% | 32.3% | 1.4% | 2.5% |
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05UC admissions, universitywide2014–2025 · summed across CEEB codes at query time
ShowHide table 05 — UC admissions, universitywide
| Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled | GPA (applied) | GPA (admitted) | GPA (enrolled) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 3.85 | 3.97 | 3.99 |
| 2024 | 29 | 19 | 7 | 3.79 | 3.96 | 4.03 |
| 2023 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 3.83 | 4.09 | 4.09 |
| 2022 | 24 | 15 | 7 | 3.86 | 4.03 | 4.02 |
| 2021 | 25 | 22 | 12 | 3.91 | 3.93 | 3.85 |
| 2020 | 40 | 28 | 15 | 3.76 | 3.84 | 3.93 |
| 2019 | 32 | 15 | 7 | 3.84 | 4.01 | 4.08 |
| 2018 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 3.71 | 3.81 | 3.82 |
| 2017 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 3.65 | 3.85 | — |
| 2016 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 3.64 | 3.98 | 3.98 |
| 2015 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 3.50 | 4.04 | 4.02 |
| 2014 | 9 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.65 | — | — |
‹n = UC masks counts below n · a missing year means zero or masked — never assume zero · GPA cells blank for years with more than one contributing CEEB code (a summed GPA would be fabricated math) · GPAs live here and nowhere else on this page · Applied/Admitted/Enrolled reflect who applied, not what the school taught — no admit rate is computed or implied by this table. Series shown from 2014; full record to 1994 at the UC Infocenter.
06UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file
ShowHide table 06 — UC admissions by campus
| Campus | Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2025 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2024 | 12 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2023 | 8 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2022 | 13 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2021 | 9 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2024 | 8 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2023 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2021 | 12 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2025 | 12 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2024 | 21 | 6 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2023 | 13 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2022 | 16 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2021 | 16 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2025 | 11 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2024 | 20 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2023 | 11 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2022 | 18 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2021 | 19 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2025 | 5 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2025 | 11 | 9 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2024 | 12 | 6 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2023 | 7 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2022 | 14 | 7 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2021 | 16 | 13 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2025 | 10 | 4 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2024 | 15 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2023 | 12 | 3 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2022 | 10 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2021 | 15 | 8 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2025 | 7 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2024 | 9 | 8 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2023 | 9 | 7 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2022 | 9 | 8 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2021 | 8 | 8 | ‹3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2024 | 6 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2021 | 6 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2025 | 17 | 14 | 6 |
| Universitywide | 2024 | 29 | 19 | 7 |
| Universitywide | 2023 | 20 | 13 | 7 |
| Universitywide | 2022 | 24 | 15 | 7 |
| Universitywide | 2021 | 25 | 22 | 12 |
Σ campuses ≠ universitywide — students apply to several campuses; the Universitywide row (muted) is its own independent count, never a sum of the rows above it.
07Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshotstructural, dated — newest published; biennial
ShowHide table 07 — Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshot
| Measure | This school |
|---|---|
| AP offered | not offered |
| AP course count | not reported |
| AP enrollment | not reported |
| IB participation | not offered |
| Dual enrollment | offered · 656 enrolled |
| Algebra I in grade 8 | offered · 1 enrolled |
| Calculus sections | 0 |
| Physics sections | 8 |
| Chemistry sections | 8 |
| Total enrollment (CRDC) | 2,039 |
Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.
08College destinationsclass of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate
ShowHide table 08 — College destinations
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 7 | 1.9% |
| California State University | 8 | 2.2% |
| California community college | 144 | 39.8% |
| In-state private | 11 | 3.0% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 28 | 7.7% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 0 | 0.0% |
| Not enrolled | 164 | 45.3% |
362 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 55% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
09California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 09 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −10 | 626 | Moderate | −5 | 626 | Average |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −9 | 505 | Moderate | −2 | 505 | Average |
| English Only | −11 | 501 | not categorised | −5 | 500 | not categorised |
| Hispanic or Latino | −7 | 407 | Moderate | 0 | 409 | Average |
| White | −27 | 120 | Minimal | −15 | 119 | Moderate |
| Students with Disabilities | −8 | 109 | Moderate | −13 | 110 | Moderate |
| English Learner | −4 | 89 | Average | −10 | 90 | Moderate |
| Black or African American | +4 | 60 | Average | −11 | 60 | Moderate |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | −4 | 50 | Average | −6 | 51 | Moderate |
| English Learners Only | −2 | 49 | not categorised | +1 | 50 | not categorised |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | −10 | 40 | not categorised | −19 | 40 | not categorised |
| Homeless Youth | −32 | 30 | Minimal | −8 | 30 | Moderate |
| Two or More Races | −6 | 29 | Moderate | −16 | 28 | Moderate |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/excelsior-charter-0761"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Excelsior Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=1,647 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · UC Infocenter (annual refresh, summer) — ‹5/‹3 = masked, never summed across campuses · CRDC 2020-21 (biennial; next expected 2021-22) · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction