ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
E. Neal Roberts Elementary · San Bernardino

E. Neal Roberts Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

E. Neal Roberts posts 24% meeting the standard and 7.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded8%21%
% Met+24%43%
Growth-21.4-2.9
Absence26.0%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,523 statewide · #21 of 55 in San Bernardino City Unified

E. Neal Roberts Elementary scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 39th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. E. Neal Roberts deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Bernardino, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 39th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 24% meet the standard today, versus 32% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 323%28%4%17%30%
Grade 450%22%31%13%32%
Grade 543%39%32%51%15%
Grade 645%30%38%40%50%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 327%18%3%21%36%
Grade 425%15%23%10%26%
Grade 525%22%21%23%7%
Grade 624%16%29%16%12%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
11%
70%
Grade 3 · 30% proficient
9%
23%
68%
Grade 4 · 32% proficient
11%
84%
Grade 5 · 16% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 14.0pp across grades; the floor slips 14.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.6%
State 21.3%
13.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-21.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
24.4%
State 42.7%
18.3pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
26.0%
State 17.9%
8.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
7.5%
State 18.0%
10.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At E. Neal Roberts Elementary in San Bernardino, 30.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. E. Neal Roberts Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested.

All students at this school: 25% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 25%, district —, state 43%25%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 25%, district 28%, state 32%25% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 26%, district 29%, state 32%26% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 28%, district 30%, state 44%28% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 22%, district 29%, state 42%22% · −3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 18%, district 9%, state 11%18% · −7 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 8%, district 20%, state 26%8% · −18 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 13.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 26.0%, district 29.3%, state 17.9%26.0% · +8.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −0.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–625.6%
TK/K35.5%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Curtis Middle, which scores 16 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 22:121:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience15.3 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers19%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,927 – $136,734
Principal salary$170,815 – $190,823
Superintendent salary$413,775

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,426, CA average $14,815$25,426 · spent at this school
Federal share$599 per student

$599 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,775 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,530 per pupil
2019$15,782 per pupil
2018$15,714 per pupil
2017$13,451 per pupil
2016$12,603 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic79.1%
District 82.2% · CA 56.1%
Black17.2%
District 9.3% · CA 4.8%
Other2.6%
District 3.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.7%
District 1.2% · CA 10.2%
White0.5%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 96.5% (33pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$54K · CA $85K
Median home value$303K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+6% · CA 35%
ZIP population47,869
Median age31 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 6% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is E. Neal Roberts Elementary a good elementary school?

E. Neal Roberts Elementary has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 39th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,523 statewide. 7.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are E. Neal Roberts Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 24.4% of students at E. Neal Roberts Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 374 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does E. Neal Roberts Elementary rank in California?

E. Neal Roberts Elementary ranks #3,523 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 39th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is E. Neal Roberts Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at E. Neal Roberts Elementary decreases by 21.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at E. Neal Roberts Elementary?

26.0% of students at E. Neal Roberts Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does E. Neal Roberts Elementary compare to other schools in San Bernardino?

E. Neal Roberts Elementary scores 38/100 (39th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 425 students. Use the schools in San Bernardino page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does E. Neal Roberts Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At E. Neal Roberts Elementary in San Bernardino, 30.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. E. Neal Roberts Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
7.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 37th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-21.4pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 65th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
24.4%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 36th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
26.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 37th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
7.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 36th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35419%11%15%56%30%−14
Grade 4659%23%31%37%32%−12
Grade 5665%11%18%67%15%−33
Grade 64810%40%27%23%50%+3
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3567%29%13%52%36%−10
Grade 4655%22%35%38%26%−15
Grade 5681%6%26%66%7%−28
Grade 6504%8%40%48%12%−23
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11681%4%56%38%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22730.4%−4−8
Hispanic/Latino18531.9%−4−7
English Learners7820.5%+10+10
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
E. Neal Roberts Elementary ←387.6%24.4%−21.40.7%
Ballington Academy for the Arts and Sciences - San1.1 mi6217.9%42.8%+58.50.3%
Savant Preparatory Academy of Business0.6 mi5336.4%58.8%−12.813.6%
iEmpire Academy2 mi4913.0%32.5%−23.62.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194043#311910.7%32.2%17.9%2.7%+8.9pp
20223343#32547.9%23.9%43.6%1.1%+7.8pp
20234462#21565.8%19.1%37.1%1.2%+22.6pp
20244147#30627.7%22.7%28.7%0.7%+17.7pp
20253839#35237.6%24.4%26.0%0.7%-21.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female20.8%24.5%+3.7pp
Male15.2%28.8%+13.6pp
Black/African American25.0%36.0%+11.0pp
Hispanic/Latino17.6%23.1%+5.5pp
Students with Disabilities16.7%19.6%+2.9pp
English Learners11.0%16.1%+5.1pp
Homeless27.8%17.7%-10.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18.3%26.6%+8.3pp
All Students18.0%26.6%+8.6pp
Foster Youth63.6%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction