Dixie Canyon Community Charter: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Dixie Canyon Community Charter posts 65% meeting the standard, and 38.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 60 | 38% | 65% | +4.2 | 17.0% | 0.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Dixie Canyon Community Charter scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “65% proficient” and call it done. Dixie Canyon Community Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sherman Oaks, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Dixie Canyon Community Charter's low-income kids hit 59.6% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, Dixie Canyon Community Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 82nd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 65% meet the standard today, versus 70% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 81% | 81% | 79% | 57% | 61% |
| Grade 4 | 72% | 72% | 76% | 67% | 64% |
| Grade 5 | 69% | 85% | 68% | 75% | 82% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 75% | 68% | 70% | 63% | 69% |
| Grade 4 | 72% | 62% | 66% | 69% | 56% |
| Grade 5 | 50% | 59% | 56% | 60% | 56% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.6pp across grades; the floor rises 20.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Dixie Canyon Community Charter's most underrated number
59.6% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Dixie Canyon Community Charter in Sherman Oaks, 59.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dixie Canyon Community Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 18.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.9% Math proficient); White students (74.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.6 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 104 students tested.
5 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$522 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Dixie Canyon Community Charter a good elementary school?
What are Dixie Canyon Community Charter's CAASPP test scores?
How does Dixie Canyon Community Charter rank in California?
Is Dixie Canyon Community Charter getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Dixie Canyon Community Charter?
How does Dixie Canyon Community Charter compare to other schools in Sherman Oaks?
How does Dixie Canyon Community Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 81
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 108 | 37% | 24% | 22% | 17% | 61% | +18 |
| Grade 4 | 94 | 41% | 22% | 19% | 17% | 64% | +19 |
| Grade 5 | 78 | 44% | 38% | 10% | 8% | 82% | +34 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 109 | 36% | 33% | 17% | 14% | 69% | +23 |
| Grade 4 | 95 | 33% | 23% | 32% | 13% | 56% | +14 |
| Grade 5 | 80 | 40% | 16% | 29% | 15% | 56% | +21 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 81 | 25% | 31% | 37% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 104 | 59.6% | +19 | +21 |
| White | 139 | 74.1% | +5 | +12 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 54 | 51.9% | +11 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dixie Canyon Community Charter ← | — | 60 | 38.4% | 64.6% | +4.2 | 0.5% |
| Carpenter Community Charter | 1.9 mi | 85 | 59.8% | 82.6% | −2.2 | 0.3% |
| Roscomare Road Elementary | 2.9 mi | 85 | 62.2% | 84.1% | −1.9 | 0.1% |
| Kester Avenue Elementary | 2.3 mi | 72 | 53.8% | 75.4% | +2.0 | 0.3% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 56 | 75 | #1363 | 39.3% | 69.8% | 14.5% | 0.0% | -18.8pp |
| 2022 | 64 | 90 | #561 | 44.2% | 71.2% | 19.4% | 0.0% | -3.0pp |
| 2023 | 54 | 79 | #1223 | 39.5% | 69.2% | 19.3% | 0.2% | -12.7pp |
| 2024 | 54 | 76 | #1402 | 36.0% | 65.1% | 16.1% | 0.2% | +7.5pp |
| 2025 | 60 | 82 | #1061 | 38.4% | 64.6% | 17.0% | 0.5% | +4.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 17.8% | 15.1% | -2.7pp |
| Male | 11.5% | 19.0% | +7.5pp |
| Asian | 2.5% | 21.4% | +18.9pp |
| Black/African American | 29.4% | 40.0% | +10.6pp |
| White | 5.6% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 20.7% | 21.7% | +1.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 18.6% | 10.2% | -8.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 20.8% | 26.3% | +5.5pp |
| English Learners | 26.5% | 38.5% | +12.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 25.4% | 25.6% | +0.2pp |
| All Students | 14.6% | 16.9% | +2.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 8.9% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction