Connecting Waters Charter: Kids show up here — absenteeism is half the state rate. Test scores are still catching up.
Connecting Waters Charter's strongest numbers are the quiet ones: attendance and discipline. The academic picture is still developing — and culture is usually where that starts.
Connecting Waters Charter scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 56th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “33% proficient” and call it done. Connecting Waters Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Waterford, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 3.1% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
As a charter, Connecting Waters Charter enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.8pp across grades; the floor rises 11.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask how the school built its attendance culture — and what the academic plan looks like from here.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
K-12 Path
Connecting Waters Charter serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here.
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 43
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -14.2pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
Frequently asked questions
Is Connecting Waters Charter a good elementary school?
What are Connecting Waters Charter's CAASPP test scores?
How does Connecting Waters Charter rank in California?
Is Connecting Waters Charter getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Connecting Waters Charter?
How does Connecting Waters Charter compare to other schools in Waterford?
How does Connecting Waters Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 47 | 11% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 23% | −20 |
| Grade 4 | 52 | 19% | 31% | 15% | 35% | 50% | +5 |
| Grade 5 | 46 | 17% | 17% | 28% | 37% | 35% | −13 |
| Grade 6 | 62 | 15% | 29% | 31% | 26% | 44% | −3 |
| Grade 7 | 60 | 13% | 40% | 22% | 25% | 53% | +6 |
| Grade 8 | 69 | 10% | 33% | 23% | 33% | 43% | −3 |
| Grade 11 | 69 | 16% | 36% | 20% | 28% | 52% | +5 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 48 | 13% | 21% | 15% | 52% | 33% | −12 |
| Grade 4 | 52 | 6% | 25% | 33% | 37% | 31% | −11 |
| Grade 5 | 46 | 9% | 15% | 11% | 65% | 24% | −11 |
| Grade 6 | 63 | 6% | 14% | 33% | 46% | 21% | −14 |
| Grade 7 | 60 | 3% | 20% | 23% | 53% | 23% | −11 |
| Grade 8 | 69 | 10% | 13% | 19% | 58% | 23% | −9 |
| Grade 11 | 69 | 7% | 6% | 17% | 70% | 13% | −10 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 184 | 5% | 20% | 57% | 18% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 233 | 40.8% | +9 | +3 |
| White | 172 | 41.9% | −3 | −20 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 146 | 37.0% | +5 | −2 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecting Waters Charter ← | — | 45 | 12.4% | 32.7% | +1.0 | 0.2% |
| Hickman Elementary | 1.5 mi | 48 | 19.7% | 55.3% | −12.3 | 0.7% |
| Hickman Charter | 1.6 mi | 39 | 12.6% | 30.5% | +4.3 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.