ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Concordia Elementary · San Clemente

Concordia Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Concordia posts 74% meeting the standard, and 43.2% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6245
% Exceeded43%21%
% Met+74%43%
Growth-25.4-2.9
Absence16.6%17.9%
Suspension1.3%1.6%
Scope Score
62
🏫 Solid Base · Solid
ranked #875 statewide · #22 of 39 in Capistrano Unified

Concordia Elementary scores 62 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 85th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.

Most rating sites would stop at “74% proficient” and call it done. Concordia deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Clemente, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Concordia's low-income kids hit 60.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 85th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 74% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%67%67%68%85%
Grade 470%71%75%66%76%
Grade 575%78%75%72%66%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 367%65%64%64%89%
Grade 479%62%60%60%69%
Grade 562%57%55%53%57%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

63%
23%
14%
Grade 3 · 86% proficient
47%
28%
25%
Grade 4 · 75% proficient
33%
32%
35%
Grade 5 · 65% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 29.2pp across grades; the floor slips 19.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

60.8%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Concordia's most underrated number

60.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Concordia low-income: 60.8%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
43.2%
State 21.3%
21.9pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-25.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
73.7%
State 42.7%
31.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.6%
State 17.9%
1.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.3%
State 1.6%
0.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.3%
State 18.0%
11.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Concordia Elementary in San Clemente, 60.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Concordia Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (54.1% Math proficient); White students (76.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.5 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 74 students tested.

All students at this school: 73% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 73%, district —, state 43%73%
WhiteWhite: this school 75%, district 74%, state 56%75% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 77%, district 69%, state 44%77% · +4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 69%, district 66%, state 42%69% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 57%, district 49%, state 32%57% · −16 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 56%, district 45%, state 32%56% · −17 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 54%, district 32%, state 15%54% · −19 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 62%, district 60%, state 46%62% · −11 vs school

6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 20.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.6%, district 13.9%, state 17.9%16.6% · −1.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.3%, district —, state 1.6%1.3% · −0.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.8%
TK/K17.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 23:127:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience12.3 years
Fully credentialed96%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,219 – $130,638
Principal salary$185,421 – $206,216
Superintendent salary$348,333

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,782, CA average $14,815$16,782 · spent at this school
District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,166 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support10%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,431 per pupil
2019$11,341 per pupil
2018$10,665 per pupil
2017$9,388 per pupil
2016$8,875 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White72.0%
District 51.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic15.9%
District 26.7% · CA 56.1%
Other11.6%
District 14.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.4%
District 7.4% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 25.7% (38pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$112K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.44M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+51% · CA 35%
ZIP population36,939
Median age45 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Concordia Elementary a good elementary school?

Concordia Elementary has a Scope Score of 62 out of 100, placing it in the 85th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #875 statewide. 43.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 21.9 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Concordia Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 73.7% of students at Concordia Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 43.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 43.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 524 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Concordia Elementary rank in California?

Concordia Elementary ranks #875 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 85th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Concordia Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Concordia Elementary decreases by 25.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Concordia Elementary?

16.6% of students at Concordia Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Concordia Elementary compare to other schools in San Clemente?

Concordia Elementary scores 62/100 (85th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 533 students. Use the schools in San Clemente page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Concordia Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Concordia Elementary in San Clemente, 60.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Concordia Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (54.1% Math proficient); White students (76.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.5 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 74 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
43.2%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 71th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-25.4pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
73.7%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 74th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 53th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 34th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38063%23%8%8%85%+42
Grade 49547%28%13%12%76%+31
Grade 58733%32%16%18%66%+18
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38053%36%9%3%89%+43
Grade 49535%35%20%11%69%+28
Grade 58729%29%24%18%57%+22
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/118924%33%36%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7460.8%+6+23
White19676.5%−2+15
Students with Disabilities3961.5%+26+45
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Concordia Elementary ←6243.2%73.7%−25.41.3%
San Onofre Elementary1.4 mi7649.9%77.3%+2.81.8%
Las Palmas Elementary2.4 mi5528.8%53.5%+8.20.9%
Clarence Lobo Elementary2.5 mi5019.7%45.6%+1.11.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196484#85638.9%71.1%8.7%1.0%-1.3pp
20225886#81234.3%66.7%31.5%0.4%+1.8pp
20236488#68338.5%65.8%28.5%0.6%-0.6pp
20246083#99434.7%63.9%14.4%0.5%-3.6pp
20256285#87543.2%73.7%16.6%1.3%-25.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.1%14.3%+5.2pp
Male8.3%18.7%+10.4pp
Filipino12.5%30.0%+17.5pp
Hispanic/Latino6.6%27.9%+21.3pp
Two or More Races4.7%16.7%+12.0pp
Students with Disabilities11.3%20.8%+9.5pp
English Learners6.7%31.6%+24.9pp
Homeless16.7%33.3%+16.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.9%28.0%+15.1pp
All Students8.7%16.5%+7.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction