ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Public elementary school

Chavez (Cesar) Elementary

San Francisco, CA · Grades TK-5 · 397 students · San Francisco Unified

The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

15% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 15% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

On the Rise

What this means for your family

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

How archetypes are assigned →

Contact

PrincipalLindsay Dowdle
GradesTK-5
Enrollment397 students

Math

15%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

English

15%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

397

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

35%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 13%2022: 7%2023: 10%2024: 16%2025: 15%2019: 21%2022: 9%2023: 10%2024: 13%2025: 15%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 13%2022: 7%2023: 10%2024: 16%2025: 15%2019: 21%2022: 9%2023: 10%2024: 13%2025: 15%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201913%21%
20227%9%
202310%10%
202416%13%
202515%15%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Climbed from the 4th to the 17th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Chavez (Cesar) deserves a closer read. Two-thirds of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

191 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 61 tracked

Chavez (Cesar) Elementary scores 23 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 17th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 15% meet the standard today, versus 19% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 4th percentile · Scope Score 15 of 1002022 · 1st percentile · Scope Score 11 of 1002023 · 4th percentile · Scope Score 14 of 1002024 · 19th percentile · Scope Score 25 of 1002025 · 17th percentile · Scope Score 23 of 100
ELARed(Maintained)MathOrange(Maintained)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 319%7%9%7%5%
Grade 423%7%16%12%14%
Grade 523%11%10%19%27%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 321%11%18%23%17%
Grade 422%3%7%18%15%
Grade 55%3%3%9%13%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

One in ten of students here meet the standard. 4% clear it by a lot.

ELA15% met or exceeded
Exceeded 3%Met 12%Nearly Met 20%Not Met 65%
Math15% met or exceeded
Exceeded 6%Met 9%Nearly Met 23%Not Met 62%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)AbsenceSuspension
This school234%15%Above avg · p7435.2%0.3%
CA average · Elementary School3921%43%Average · p5017.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope2339
% Exceeded4%21%
% Met+15%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avg · p74Average · p50
Absence35.2%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

Our growth read and California's own model disagree here — the 74th percentile against the state's 40th.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 74th percentile of California elementary schools; the state's puts it around the 40th in reading and math together — a harder read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
2%
exceeded standard · 9% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
5%
exceeded standard · 27% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 74th percentile among California elementary schools.74th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −3 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 35th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.35th pctile · −3 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 45th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.45th pctile · −1 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.

At Chavez (Cesar) Elementary in San Francisco, 12.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Chavez (Cesar) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 26.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (13.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (14.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 9.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 149 students tested.

Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 26 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 15% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 15%, district —, state 43%15%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 14%, district 22%, state 32%14% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 13%, district 36%, state 32%13% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 10%, state 11%10% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 14%, district 50%, state 44%14% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 16%, district 49%, state 42%16% · +1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 19%, state 15%6% · −9 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 10%, district 22%, state 22%10% · −5 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Hispanic or Latino students113 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 113 students.−4 pts · −5 vs typical
English Learner104 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 104 students.−2 pts · 0 vs typical
Low-income students93 studentsLow-income students, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 93 students.−1 pts · −1 vs typical
English learners only73 studentsEnglish learners only, reading: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −11 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 73 students.−15 pts · −4 vs typical
Students with disabilities33 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −16 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 33 students.−16 pts · −8 vs typical
Math
Hispanic or Latino students113 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 113 students.0 pts · +1 vs typical
English Learner104 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +1 scale-score points versus expectation, against +2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 104 students.+1 pts · −1 vs typical
Low-income students93 studentsLow-income students, math: +2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 93 students.+2 pts · +3 vs typical
English learners only73 studentsEnglish learners only, math: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 73 students.−4 pts · −2 vs typical
Students with disabilities33 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 33 students.−11 pts · −6 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 25 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher25 · district 22
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience11.1 years
Fully credentialed73%
Intern / emergency permit13.5%
PrincipalLindsay Dowdle
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$69,525 – $131,654
Principal salary$150,963 – $163,648
Superintendent salary$328,879

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (51.9% vs 25.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

35.2% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 17.9% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — a school visit will tell you more than this number.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 35.2%, district 25.8%, state 17.9%35.2% · +17.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.3pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–625.4%
TK/K51.9%

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

It spends $24,114 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

$366 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,114, CA average $14,491$24,114 · spent at this school
Federal share$366 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 60%Instruction support 12%Student services 15%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 7%Other 1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,416 per pupil
2019$17,139 per pupil
2018$17,228 per pupil
2017$13,640 per pupil
2016$11,532 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 11% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino92.7% · district 36.7% · CA 56.1%
White1.3% · district 13.1% · CA 19.9%
Black2.5% · district 7.3% · CA 4.8%
Other3.5% · district 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch74.1% · CA 64%
Median income$158K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.45M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+62% · CA 35%
ZIP population66,865
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Find contact and visit details →

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Chavez (Cesar) ElementaryPublicNeeds Support4%15%School being viewed
Chinese Immersion School at DeAvilaPublicStrong59%81%1.9 mi
New Traditions ElementaryPublicStrong48%79%2.3 mi
Grattan ElementaryPublicStrong42%72%2.0 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in San Francisco →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Check your address with the district

School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with San Francisco Unified.

District information →

Schools across the K–12 journey

Elementary · K–5

Middle · 6–8

Brown Jr. (Willie L) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 42/100
Giannini (A.P.) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 63/100
Aptos MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 57/100
Francisco MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 33/100
Hoover (Herbert) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 51/100
Denman (James) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 26/100
Lick (James) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 25/100
Marina MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 47/100
King Jr. (Martin Luther) Academic MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 24/100
Presidio MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 65/100
Roosevelt MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 65/100
Visitacion Valley MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 12/100
Everett MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 12/100

High school · 9–12

Marshall (Thurgood) HighScope 25estimated path

The road from this school ends at Marshall (Thurgood) High, which sent 5 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 5 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Marshall (Thurgood) High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 57% of Marshall (Thurgood) High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

5 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 5 AP subjects taught → full record on Marshall (Thurgood) High's page
Source: UC & College Board

Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Chavez (Cesar) Elementary a good elementary school?
Chavez (Cesar) Elementary has a Scope Score of 23 out of 100, placing it in the 17th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,738 statewide. 4.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Chavez (Cesar) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 14.9% of students at Chavez (Cesar) Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 4.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 10.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 4.4% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 386 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Chavez (Cesar) Elementary rank in California?
Chavez (Cesar) Elementary ranks #4,738 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 17th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Chavez (Cesar) Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Chavez (Cesar) Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks above avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 74th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Chavez (Cesar) Elementary?
35.2% of students at Chavez (Cesar) Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Chavez (Cesar) Elementary compare to other schools in San Francisco?
Chavez (Cesar) Elementary scores 23/100 (17th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 397 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Chavez (Cesar) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Chavez (Cesar) Elementary in San Francisco, 12.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Chavez (Cesar) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 26.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (13.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (14.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 9.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 149 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Chavez (Cesar) Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Chavez (Cesar) Elementary is zoned to Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle, Giannini (A.P.) Middle, and Aptos Middle. Scope Scores: Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle 42, Giannini (A.P.) Middle 63, Aptos Middle 57 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

The 6 things our score weighs

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 80 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard4.4%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded14.9%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism35.2%17.9%5%
Suspension rate0.3%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)11.6%18.0%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Chavez (Cesar) Elementary: reading the evidence

Chavez (Cesar) posts low test scores — and the returning cohort gains more here than at most schools between grade 3 and grade 5. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Chavez (Cesar) Elementary is ranked #4,738 statewide · #56 of 74 in San Francisco Unified.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard4.4%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded14.9%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism35.2%17.9%5%
Suspension rate0.3%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)11.6%18.0%5%
Exceeded standard
↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 34 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 29 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
↑ vs CA average · 74th pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.9% · index 22 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.9pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.2pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 18.0% · index 42 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3652%3%22%74%5%−39
Grade 4663%11%18%68%14%−31
Grade 5605%22%20%53%27%−21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3652%15%26%57%17%−28
Grade 4686%9%21%65%15%−27
Grade 56210%3%23%65%13%−22

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide630%11%59%30%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14912.1%−27−26
Hispanic/Latino17814.0%−12−25
English Learners1388.7%+1−2
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Chavez (Cesar) Elementary ←—234.4%14.9%+9.0pp+80 pts0.3%
Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila1.9 mi8259.2%81.0%+25.6pp—0.1%
New Traditions Elementary2.3 mi6547.9%78.9%+1.1pp—0.2%
Grattan Elementary2 mi6442.4%71.8%+11.5pp—0.3%
California average—3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019154#52814.5%18.7%27.9%0.9%-5.6pp
2022111#56291.3%6.9%67.5%0.1%-2.0pp
2023144#54733.1%10.5%49.9%0.1%-7.1pp
20242519#46092.8%14.7%34.3%0.1%-1.3pp
20252317#47384.4%14.9%35.2%0.3%+9.0pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 26 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
Group20192025Δ
Female29.2%36.0%+6.8pp
Male28.9%37.0%+8.1pp
Black/African American54.5%72.7%+18.2pp
Hispanic/Latino28.2%34.8%+6.6pp
White15.4%——
Students with Disabilities28.9%46.2%+17.3pp
English Learners24.7%31.0%+6.3pp
Homeless28.9%42.7%+13.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged28.8%37.4%+8.6pp
All Students29.1%36.5%+7.4pp
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−3121Average−1121Average
Hispanic or Latino−4113Average0113Average
English Learner−2104Average+1104Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−193Average+293Average
English Learners Only−1573not categorised−473not categorised
Students with Disabilities−1633Moderate−1133Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+2731not categorised+831not categorised
Homeless Youth−618Moderate+218Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/chavez-cesar-elementary-1149"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Chavez (Cesar) Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Chavez (Cesar) Elementary

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.