Mission Preparatory: 49% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 43%. But suspensions run 2× the state rate.
Mission Preparatory posts 49% meeting the standard, against 43% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.
Mission Preparatory scores 49 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 64th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “49% proficient” and call it done. Mission Preparatory deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Francisco, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Mission Preparatory's low-income kids hit 51.9% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, Mission Preparatory enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
The story this school is actually telling
of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 42.7% statewide.
of students were suspended, versus 1.6% statewide — worth asking about on a tour.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 10.0pp across grades; the floor slips 2.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Mission Preparatory's most underrated number
51.9% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask about the discipline philosophy and what a typical suspension is for. Numbers can't tell you whether a campus feels strict or chaotic — a visit can.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 72
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
Frequently asked questions
Is Mission Preparatory a good elementary school?
What are Mission Preparatory's CAASPP test scores?
How does Mission Preparatory rank in California?
Is Mission Preparatory getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Mission Preparatory?
How does Mission Preparatory compare to other schools in San Francisco?
How does Mission Preparatory serve low-income and underrepresented students?
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 29% | 17% | 27% | 27% | 46% | +3 |
| Grade 4 | 51 | 37% | 31% | 16% | 16% | 69% | +24 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 19% | 25% | 26% | 30% | 43% | −4 |
| Grade 6 | 52 | 12% | 50% | 23% | 15% | 62% | +15 |
| Grade 7 | 52 | 17% | 38% | 21% | 23% | 56% | +8 |
| Grade 8 | 49 | 16% | 41% | 16% | 27% | 57% | +11 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 27% | 25% | 29% | 19% | 52% | +6 |
| Grade 4 | 51 | 27% | 27% | 29% | 16% | 55% | +13 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 15% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 30% | −5 |
| Grade 6 | 52 | 19% | 23% | 27% | 31% | 42% | +7 |
| Grade 7 | 52 | 15% | 10% | 37% | 38% | 25% | −9 |
| Grade 8 | 49 | 16% | 12% | 29% | 43% | 29% | −4 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 102 | 8% | 23% | 62% | 8% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 262 | 51.9% | +13 | +14 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 265 | 51.7% | +26 | +13 |
| English Learners | 118 | 25.4% | +18 | +15 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mission Preparatory ← | — | 49 | 25.7% | 49.2% | −12.2 | 3.4% |
| Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila | 2.2 mi | 88 | 59.2% | 81.0% | +25.6 | 0.1% |
| King (Thomas Starr) Elementary | 0.5 mi | 64 | 41.7% | 62.8% | −1.7 | 1.7% |
| Lau (Gordon J.) Elementary | 2.7 mi | 63 | 38.1% | 65.8% | +6.6 | 0.4% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.