Chapman Heights Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
Chapman Heights posts 45% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 46 | 21% | 45% | +0.9 | 22.3% | 3.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Chapman Heights Elementary scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 59th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “45% proficient” and call it done. Chapman Heights deserves a closer read. The school sits in Yucaipa, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 44th to the 59th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 45% of students meet the standard today, above the 42% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 41% | 34% | 33% | 45% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 49% | 46% | 46% | 42% | 50% |
| Grade 5 | 42% | 41% | 43% | 42% | 50% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 45% | 37% | 43% | 46% | 45% |
| Grade 4 | 45% | 42% | 46% | 44% | 47% |
| Grade 5 | 28% | 26% | 26% | 38% | 38% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 8.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Chapman Heights Elementary in Yucaipa, 36.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Chapman Heights Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 students tested.
6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$412 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Chapman Heights Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Chapman Heights Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Chapman Heights Elementary rank in California?
Is Chapman Heights Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Chapman Heights Elementary?
How does Chapman Heights Elementary compare to other schools in Yucaipa?
How does Chapman Heights Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 57
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 33
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 87 | 24% | 17% | 22% | 37% | 41% | −2 |
| Grade 4 | 78 | 19% | 31% | 24% | 26% | 50% | +5 |
| Grade 5 | 122 | 25% | 25% | 21% | 29% | 50% | +2 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 87 | 22% | 23% | 20% | 36% | 45% | −1 |
| Grade 4 | 78 | 15% | 32% | 28% | 24% | 47% | +6 |
| Grade 5 | 121 | 21% | 17% | 26% | 36% | 38% | +3 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 122 | 15% | 18% | 52% | 16% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 170 | 36.5% | +2 | −2 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 155 | 41.3% | +5 | +2 |
| White | 118 | 50.8% | +0 | −11 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapman Heights Elementary ← | — | 46 | 21.0% | 45.3% | +0.9 | 3.3% |
| Inland Leaders Charter | 2 mi | 61 | 39.4% | 66.6% | +3.0 | 1.3% |
| Competitive Edge Charter Academy (CECA) | 1.2 mi | 59 | 28.7% | 54.2% | +2.0 | 0.8% |
| Ridgeview Elementary | 1.9 mi | 50 | 16.5% | 37.7% | +12.3 | 2.9% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 40 | 44 | #3062 | 16.0% | 41.7% | 11.5% | 0.5% | -8.0pp |
| 2022 | 35 | 48 | #3012 | 13.2% | 37.7% | 29.5% | 0.6% | -2.3pp |
| 2023 | 40 | 54 | #2659 | 17.4% | 39.4% | 30.6% | 0.3% | -4.0pp |
| 2024 | 43 | 53 | #2716 | 20.4% | 42.7% | 24.6% | 1.1% | -5.2pp |
| 2025 | 46 | 59 | #2353 | 21.0% | 45.3% | 22.3% | 3.3% | +0.9pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11.3% | 21.5% | +10.2pp |
| Male | 11.6% | 23.5% | +11.9pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.5% | 24.7% | +13.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 15.1% | 28.7% | +13.6pp |
| English Learners | 9.3% | 27.1% | +17.8pp |
| Homeless | 21.1% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 16.8% | 27.1% | +10.3pp |
| All Students | 11.5% | 22.5% | +11.0pp |
| Two or More Races | — | 21.1% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction