ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Carmel Middle · Carmel

Carmel Middle: 66% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 39%. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Carmel posts 66% meeting the standard, against 39% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.

4380 Carmel Valley Road, 93922 (opens in new tab)·Carmel Unified·Carmel·Grades 6-8·468 students·17% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(831) 624-2785
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5643
% Exceeded31%17%
% Met+66%39%
Growth-4.7+1.5
Absence10.5%18.5%
Suspension3.3%3.7%
Scope Score
56
🏫 Solid Base · Solid
ranked #403 statewide

Carmel Middle scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.

Most rating sites would stop at “66% proficient” and call it done. Carmel deserves a closer read. It sits at the 82nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Carmel's low-income kids hit 56.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 94th to the 82nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 66% meet the standard today, versus 74% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 678%77%74%68%75%
Grade 781%78%75%72%73%
Grade 882%79%72%68%69%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 663%61%57%58%58%
Grade 770%61%59%63%64%
Grade 872%69%64%58%55%

The story this school is actually telling

The floor · met or exceeded
65.5%

of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 39.3% statewide.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 6→8
4.7pp

proficiency runs 67% in this year's grade 6 against 62% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

33%
42%
25%
Grade 6 · 75% proficient
30%
43%
27%
Grade 7 · 73% proficient
29%
40%
31%
Grade 8 · 69% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 4.1pp across grades; the floor slips 6.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

56.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Carmel's most underrated number

56.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Carmel low-income: 56.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
31.2%
State 16.8%
14.4pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-4.7pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
65.5%
State 39.3%
26.3pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
10.5%
State 18.5%
8.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.3%
State 3.7%
0.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Carmel Middle in Carmel, 56.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Carmel Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 2.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.5% Math proficient); White students (73.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 85 students tested.

All students at this school: 66% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 66%, district —, state 39%66%
WhiteWhite: this school 67%, district 72%, state 56%67% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 63%, district 68%, state 42%63% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 68%, district 71%, state 44%68% · +2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 56%, district 58%, state 32%56% · −10 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 48%, district 54%, state 32%48% · −18 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 28%, district 34%, state 15%28% · −38 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 67%, district 74%, state 56%67% · +2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 88%, district 93%, state 72%88% · +22 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +4.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 10.5%, district 13.8%, state 18.5%10.5% · −8.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.3%, district —, state 3.7%3.3% · −0.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.7%
Grades 7–810.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 13:1, district 17:113:1
Teaching staff37 teachers
Avg. experience16.9 years
Fully credentialed95%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$78,959 – $162,162
Principal salary$202,756 – $233,472
Superintendent salary$294,125

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $40,979, CA average $14,815$40,979 · spent at this school
Federal share$523 per student

$523 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$39,895 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$26,833 per pupil
2019$23,572 per pupil
2018$24,026 per pupil
2017$22,712 per pupil
2016$21,730 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White62.8%
District 62.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic20.3%
District 20.6% · CA 56.1%
Other13.3%
District 12.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.6%
District 4.1% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 17.3% (46pp below CA avg)
Worth Knowing

At 468 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 58% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Carmel Middle a good middle school?

Carmel Middle has a Scope Score of 56 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #403 statewide. 31.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.4 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Carmel Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 65.5% of students at Carmel Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 31.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 34.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 31.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 931 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Carmel Middle rank in California?

Carmel Middle ranks #403 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Carmel Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Carmel Middle decreases by 4.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Carmel Middle?

10.5% of students at Carmel Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Carmel Middle compare to other schools in Carmel?

Carmel Middle scores 56/100 (82nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 468 students. Use the schools in Carmel page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Carmel Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Carmel Middle in Carmel, 56.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Carmel Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 2.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.5% Math proficient); White students (73.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 85 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
31.2%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 66th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-4.7pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
65.5%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 71th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
10.5%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 61th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.3%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614433%42%19%6%75%+28
Grade 716130%43%17%11%73%+25
Grade 816129%40%19%12%69%+23
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614329%29%25%17%58%+23
Grade 716134%30%22%14%64%+30
Grade 816133%22%25%20%55%+22
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1116125%33%35%7%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8556.5%−3+18
White29373.4%−2+12
Hispanic/Latino8962.9%+3+24
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Carmel Middle ←5631.2%65.5%−4.73.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196894#12841.8%74.2%8.5%4.8%+6.4pp
20227094#12237.2%71.0%14.5%3.4%+4.9pp
20236691#20733.4%66.7%14.2%5.2%+2.9pp
20245683#37630.6%64.4%11.9%4.7%-0.1pp
20255682#40331.2%65.5%10.5%3.3%-4.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.3%8.6%+0.3pp
Male8.6%11.2%+2.6pp
Asian3.6%0.0%-3.6pp
Filipino8.3%
Hispanic/Latino9.7%10.2%+0.5pp
Two or More Races9.4%11.5%+2.1pp
Students with Disabilities14.8%19.6%+4.8pp
English Learners10.5%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.3%17.2%+4.9pp
All Students8.5%10.2%+1.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction