ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Bonita Elementary · Crows Landing

Bonita Elementary: Scores climb 3.8 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But the zoned next school scores lower.

Bonita holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

425 Fink Road, 95313 (opens in new tab)·Newman-Crows Landing Unified·Crows Landing·Grades K-5·134 students·66% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 837-4401·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5145
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+45%43%
Growth+3.8-2.9
Absence15.6%17.9%
Suspension3.2%1.6%
Scope Score
51
📈 On the Rise · Solid
ranked #1,769 statewide · #1 of 4 in Newman-Crows Landing Unified

Bonita Elementary scores 51 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 69th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “45% proficient” and call it done. Bonita deserves a closer read. The school sits in Crows Landing, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +3.8pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 83rd to the 69th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 45% meet the standard today, versus 60% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 351%52%32%25%54%
Grade 463%44%28%40%36%
Grade 584%61%65%56%71%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 349%48%36%12%50%
Grade 463%36%28%40%20%
Grade 554%45%50%35%41%

The story this school is actually telling

The trajectory · grade 3→5
+3.8pp

separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

↑ the school's value-add, not the zip code's
The next step · the zoned path
24pts

the zoned path continues to Yolo Junior High, which scores 24 points lower — the data can't say why.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

33%
21%
46%
Grade 3 · 54% proficient
16%
20%
64%
Grade 4 · 36% proficient
35%
35%
30%
Grade 5 · 70% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.0pp across grades; the floor rises 16.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
19.5%
State 21.3%
1.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+3.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
45.3%
State 42.7%
2.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.6%
State 17.9%
2.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.2%
State 1.6%
1.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.4%
State 18.0%
8.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Bonita Elementary in Crows Landing, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bonita Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (48.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.9 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 36 students tested.

All students at this school: 44% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 44%, district —, state 43%44%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 35%, district 27%, state 32%35% · −9 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 42%, district 29%, state 32%42% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 41%, district 29%, state 42%41% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 44%, district 31%, state 44%44% · −0 vs school

8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.6%, district 22.1%, state 17.9%15.6% · −2.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.2%, district —, state 1.6%3.2% · +1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.2%
TK/K19.0%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Yolo Junior High, which scores 24 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 20:122:1
Teaching staff11 teachers
Avg. experience10.8 years
Fully credentialed61%

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $35,381, CA average $14,815$35,381 · spent at this school
Federal share$549 per student

$549 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,327 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction53%
Instruction support11%
Student services14%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,058 per pupil
2019$12,929 per pupil
2018$13,285 per pupil
2017$11,775 per pupil
2016$11,275 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic61.9%
District 82.2% · CA 56.1%
White17.9%
District 11.1% · CA 19.9%
Other10.4%
District 4.1% · CA 9.0%
Black9.0%
District 2.0% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.8%
District 0.6% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 66.4% (3pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$90K · CA $85K
Median home value$428K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population1,119
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 134 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

On the state's science test (CAST), 47% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bonita Elementary a good elementary school?

Bonita Elementary has a Scope Score of 51 out of 100, placing it in the 69th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,769 statewide. 19.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Bonita Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 45.3% of students at Bonita Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 19.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 19.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 132 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Bonita Elementary rank in California?

Bonita Elementary ranks #1,769 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 69th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Bonita Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Bonita Elementary increases by 3.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Bonita Elementary?

15.6% of students at Bonita Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Bonita Elementary compare to other schools in Crows Landing?

Bonita Elementary scores 51/100 (69th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 134 students. Use the schools in Crows Landing page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Bonita Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Bonita Elementary in Crows Landing, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bonita Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (48.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.9 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 36 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
19.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 48th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+3.8pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 72th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
45.3%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 52th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 54th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.2%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 37th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32433%21%25%21%54%+11
Grade 42516%20%24%40%36%−9
Grade 51735%35%0%29%71%+23
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32413%38%13%38%50%+4
Grade 4258%12%44%36%20%−22
Grade 51712%29%29%29%41%+6
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111724%24%47%6%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged3638.9%+4+1
Hispanic/Latino4348.8%+12+10
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Bonita Elementary ←5119.5%45.3%+3.83.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196283#95326.9%60.5%11.4%2.3%+18.9pp
20224773#156018.5%47.7%33.7%0.1%+3.2pp
20235072#158415.6%39.9%29.2%3.9%+23.4pp
20243429#405614.8%34.5%22.0%3.5%+27.0pp
20255169#176919.5%45.3%15.6%3.2%+3.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.1%11.3%+3.2pp
Male14.8%17.9%+3.1pp
Hispanic/Latino10.7%14.6%+3.9pp
Two or More Races25.0%
Students with Disabilities9.5%20.0%+10.5pp
English Learners12.5%19.4%+6.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.5%15.6%-0.9pp
All Students11.4%15.0%+3.6pp
Black/African American25.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction