Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology High: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology posts 52% meeting the standard; 25.5% push past it. Steady is worth something — and the gap between those two numbers is the thing to ask about.
Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology High scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 78th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “52% proficient” and call it done. Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 72.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide.
As a charter, Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology's most underrated number
72.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 4 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 66
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Sources: CDE SARC · CDE College/Career Indicator, 2024-25
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 53 | 36% | 38% | 11% | 15% | 74% | +26 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 53 | 15% | 15% | 49% | 21% | 30% | +7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 57 | 11% | 28% | 60% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 47 | 72.3% | +31 | +34 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 51 | 72.5% | +32 | +34 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Susan and Eric Smidt Technology High ← | — | 56 | 25.5% | 51.9% | — | 1.4% |
| Downtown Business High | 2.1 mi | 68 | 43.7% | 71.9% | — | 0.3% |
| Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos | 2.3 mi | 66 | 31.7% | 63.4% | — | 0.7% |
| Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet High | 1.4 mi | 62 | 28.8% | 59.3% | — | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |