ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Abraham Lincoln Elementary · Sacramento

Abraham Lincoln Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Abraham Lincoln posts low test scores — and English learners here beat the state average for their group by 8 points in Math. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

3324 Glenmoor Drive, 95827 (opens in new tab)·Sacramento City Unified·Sacramento·Grades K-6·498 students·79% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 395-4500
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2845
% Exceeded5%21%
% Met+18%43%
Growth-2.5-2.9
Absence30.6%17.9%
Suspension3.9%1.6%
Scope Score
28
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,026 statewide · #39 of 58 in Sacramento City Unified

Abraham Lincoln Elementary scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 13th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “18% proficient” and call it done. Abraham Lincoln deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 13th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 18% meet the standard today, versus 25% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 322%21%19%22%16%
Grade 432%26%21%24%26%
Grade 528%16%28%26%22%
Grade 622%19%20%29%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 319%25%26%26%22%
Grade 431%24%24%27%11%
Grade 516%13%15%16%11%
Grade 623%13%19%22%26%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

10%
84%
Grade 3 · 16% proficient
8%
18%
74%
Grade 4 · 26% proficient
19%
78%
Grade 5 · 22% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.2%
State 21.3%
16.1pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-2.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
17.9%
State 42.7%
24.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
30.6%
State 17.9%
12.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.9%
State 1.6%
2.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.0%
State 18.0%
6.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Abraham Lincoln Elementary in Sacramento, 23.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abraham Lincoln Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (16.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (21.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested.

All students at this school: 21% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 21%, district —, state 43%21%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 25%, state 32%20% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 21%, district 37%, state 44%21% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 21%, district 35%, state 42%21% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 18%, district 28%, state 32%18% · −3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 16%, district 10%, state 11%16% · −5 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 33%, district 56%, state 56%33% · +12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 16%, state 15%5% · −15 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 8%, district 17%, state 26%8% · −12 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 7.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 30.6%, district 25.5%, state 17.9%30.6% · +12.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.9%, district —, state 1.6%3.9% · +2.3pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (44.3% vs 28.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–628.0%
TK/K44.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 23:125:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience14.0 years
Fully credentialed98%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,429 – $132,487
Principal salary$161,216 – $185,549
Superintendent salary$325,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,363, CA average $14,815$22,363 · spent at this school
Federal share$353 per student

$353 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,421 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support13%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,654 per pupil
2019$13,792 per pupil
2018$14,667 per pupil
2017$12,722 per pupil
2016$11,601 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic39.4%
District 42.2% · CA 56.1%
White21.1%
District 17.3% · CA 19.9%
Other17.7%
District 12.3% · CA 9.0%
Black13.4%
District 12.1% · CA 4.8%
Asian8.4%
District 16.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 78.9% (15pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$86K · CA $85K
Median home value$437K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population21,742
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 13% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Abraham Lincoln Elementary a good elementary school?

Abraham Lincoln Elementary has a Scope Score of 28 out of 100, placing it in the 13th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,026 statewide. 5.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.1 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Abraham Lincoln Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 17.9% of students at Abraham Lincoln Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 12.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 416 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Abraham Lincoln Elementary rank in California?

Abraham Lincoln Elementary ranks #5,026 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 13th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Abraham Lincoln Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Abraham Lincoln Elementary decreases by 2.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Abraham Lincoln Elementary?

30.6% of students at Abraham Lincoln Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Abraham Lincoln Elementary compare to other schools in Sacramento?

Abraham Lincoln Elementary scores 28/100 (13th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 498 students. Use the schools in Sacramento page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Abraham Lincoln Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Abraham Lincoln Elementary in Sacramento, 23.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abraham Lincoln Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (16.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (21.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
5.2%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 34th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-2.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 49th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
17.9%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 31th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
30.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 29th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.9%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 31th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3636%10%29%56%16%−28
Grade 4668%18%29%45%26%−19
Grade 5783%19%26%53%22%−26
Grade 6753%29%32%36%32%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36311%11%27%51%22%−23
Grade 4660%11%50%39%11%−31
Grade 5804%8%23%66%11%−24
Grade 67710%16%29%45%26%−9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11824%10%59%28%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22723.8%−6−14
Hispanic/Latino12421.8%−11−17
English Learners6512.3%+3+2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Abraham Lincoln Elementary ←285.2%17.9%−2.53.9%
Mather Heights Elementary2.7 mi6138.8%63.6%+26.31.2%
Folsom Cordova K-8 Community Charter2.3 mi5926.5%52.9%+5.90.5%
Del Dayo Elementary1.8 mi4824.7%55.6%+7.80.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193017#45945.2%24.6%14.1%3.9%+1.6pp
20222519#46273.9%20.7%49.3%2.5%-8.3pp
20232411#50776.1%22.2%36.9%3.8%-1.6pp
20242711#50775.2%23.5%31.7%4.3%-2.8pp
20252813#50265.2%17.9%30.6%3.9%-2.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.7%32.4%+17.7pp
Male13.8%30.5%+16.7pp
Asian2.4%11.9%+9.5pp
Black/African American29.2%39.0%+9.8pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino12.7%27.5%+14.8pp
Pacific Islander40.0%61.1%+21.1pp
Two or More Races15.7%41.5%+25.8pp
Students with Disabilities18.2%39.7%+21.5pp
English Learners10.6%22.3%+11.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.2%31.0%+15.8pp
All Students14.2%31.5%+17.3pp
Homeless46.4%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction