Schools in 93667 — Tollhouse, California: 3 schools. Average score 8.0 points below the state. Here is what that number does — and doesn't — tell you.
93667 has 3 ranked schools in Tollhouse, averaging a Scope Score of 35.7/100 — 8.0 points below the state average of 43.7 (a state average weighted to 93667's own mix of school levels; CDE CAASPP 2025). Scores range from 21.7 to 58.3, a 36.6-point spread. 1 school ranks in the 90th percentile or above statewide.
How 93667 schools perform
The top-ranked school is Sierra High with a Scope Score of 58 and 25.7% of students exceeding standard.
Chronic absenteeism across 93667 averages 33.5%, above the state average of 19.8%, weighted to 93667's own level mix. CDE CAASPP 2025.
All schools in 93667
ranked by Scope Score · 2024–25 CAASPP
Middle Schools (2)
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra Junior High Sierra Unified | 10.2% | 22nd percentile · Needs SupportScope Score 24/100 |
| 2 | Sierra@Home Sierra Unified | 4.4% | 16th percentile · Needs SupportScope Score 22/100 |
High Schools (2)
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra High Sierra Unified | 25.7% | 66th percentile · SolidScope Score 58/100 |
| 2 | Sierra Alternative High Sierra Unified continuation high school | 18.2% | 96th percentile · StrongWithin its own school classScope Score 39/100 |
Schools in 93667 on the map
Open these schools on the map →Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
Numbers tell you whether students are clearing the bar. A school visit tells you whether they're happy doing it. These metrics are intentionally missing from the Scope Score: class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality; arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs; teacher experience and turnover; campus safety and social-emotional support; parent and community engagement; quality of special education and gifted programs; how school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access. Full methodology