Nuview Union has two ranked public elementary schools, one middle school and one high school. Nuview Elementary is at the 49th percentile, Valley View Elementary the 20th, Mountain Shadows Middle the 38th and Nuview Bridge Early College High the 73rd, each among the California schools we score at its level (spring 2026 tests; high schools, spring 2025).
Where does the high school we score in Nuview Union stand?
Nuview Bridge Early College High’s 73rd percentile means it scored higher than 73 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
Where does Nuview Union’s money go, and what does it plan?
Nuview Union spent $19,831 per student in the 2024–25 school year.
That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Nuview Union dollar went to classroom instruction.
Spending by function
Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.
Share by function, 2024–25
Instruction61%
Instruction support8%
Student services13%
Administration10%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.
What the district plans
$8.7 million
planned in its 2026–27 plan for 21 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 24% of its $36.7 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.
The plan in short
Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 102 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
Three actions take 49% of the money. The plan itself puts 74% of it toward staff.
Staff to Student Ratios $2.1 million
Targeted Intervention Programs $1.2 million
Counseling and Mental Health Services $1.0 million
18 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help
4 of the plan’s 21 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
Catch-up help $1.2 million
English learners $0.2 million
Largest of these
Targeted Intervention Programs$1.2 million
Provide support for English Learner (EL) and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) students to become English proficient$181,825
Site Allocations-English Learner Development$38,171
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students
It plans $7.3 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $6.5 million and estimates it spent $7.0 million, $0.5 million (7%) more than planned (our arithmetic).
$7.0 million spent (estimated)$6.5 million planned
What changed
The total is $34,897 lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Technology to Support Learning, which went from $454,791 to $247,427.
Largest cuts
Technology to Support Learning−$207,364
District Professional Development−$127,541
Provide support for English Learner (EL) and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) students to become English proficient−$111,607
Largest increases
Site Allocations-Academic+$168,227
School and Classroom Environment+$82,794
Counseling and Mental Health Services+$81,207
New in the 2026–27 plan
Training/Data Analysis to support English Learners$26,606
Ask: What did Technology to Support Learning pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $207,364 less?
What its goals measure
Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure
2024–25
2025–26
Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
40%
39%
down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
26%
27%
up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 3
19 in 100
17 in 100
2 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 3
4.5%
5.1%
up 0.6 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25English learners · Goal 2
8%
3%
down 5 pts
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The plan’s own titles and amounts
Staff to Student Ratios · $2,080,643
Targeted Intervention Programs · $1,152,207
Counseling and Mental Health Services · $1,041,792
The full plan3 goals, 33 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($8.7 million).
Where does the money go?
65% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1Increase academic proficiency in literacy, numeracy, and 21st-century competencies through the implementation…$5.6 million65% of action budgets
“Increase academic proficiency in literacy, numeracy, and 21st-century competencies through the implementation of high-caliber teaching methods and learning strategies” p. 12 ↗
10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.8 million (−$159,024)
Largest funded actions
Staff to Student Ratios$2.1 millionaction 1.6 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
Targeted Intervention Programs$1.2 millionaction 1.1 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $909,561 is state funding counted toward those services
Increase Achievement of Unduplicated Students with Disabilities$0.7 millionaction 1.4 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Expanded Learning Opportunities$0.4 millionaction 1.8 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $320,844 is state funding counted toward those services
Enrichment Opportunities$0.3 millionaction 1.7 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
5 more funded actions in this goal
Additional Instructional Minutes · action 1.5 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
Site Allocations-Academic · action 1.10 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $232,993 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
Technology to Support Learning · action 1.9 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Supplemental Instructional Programs and Materials · action 1.2 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $66,171 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
District Professional Development · action 1.3 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $40,211 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Technology to Support Learning−$207,364$454,791 → $247,427 · p. 61 ↗
Site Allocations-Academic+$168,227$80,486 → $248,713 · p. 62 ↗
District Professional Development−$127,541$197,967 → $70,426 · p. 61 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Staff to Student Ratios · $2.2 million → $2.1 million · p. 61 ↗−$0.1 million
Targeted Intervention Programs · $1.1 million → $1.2 million · p. 61 ↗+$16,761
Increase Achievement of Unduplicated Students with Disabilities · $658,000 → $658,000 · p. 61 ↗unchanged
Provide support for English Learner (EL) and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) students to become English proficient$181,825action 2.2 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $101,824 is state funding counted toward those services
Site Allocations-English Learner Development$38,171action 2.4 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Training/Data Analysis to support English Learners$26,606action 2.1 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Provide support for English Learner (EL) and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) students to become English proficient−$111,607$293,432 → $181,825 · p. 62 ↗
Site Allocations-English Learner Development−$23,509$61,680 → $38,171 · p. 62 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Training/Data Analysis to support English Learners · $26,606 · p. 62 ↗new or renamed
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 4 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 25 ↗.
Goal 3Improve student success through development of targeted and coherent systems of support$2.8 million32% of action budgets
8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.6 million (+$259,127) · p. 32 ↗
Largest funded actions
Counseling and Mental Health Services$1.0 millionaction 3.2 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $672,330 is state funding counted toward those services
Improving Student Attendance$0.7 millionaction 3.3 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
School and Classroom Environment$0.3 millionaction 3.7 · p. 63 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $242,681 is state funding counted toward those services
Safety and Security$0.3 millionaction 3.6 · p. 63 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Increased Health Services$0.2 millionaction 3.4 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $137,627 is state funding counted toward those services
3 more funded actions in this goal
Site Allocations-School Climate · action 3.8 · p. 63 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $112,394 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
Parent and School Connectedness · action 3.5 · p. 62 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $84,879 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
Professional Development for Behavioral Support · action 3.1 · p. 62 ↗under $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
School and Classroom Environment+$82,794$214,106 → $296,900 · p. 63 ↗
Counseling and Mental Health Services+$0.1 million$1.0 million → $1.0 million · p. 62 ↗
Improving Student Attendance+$70,570$595,421 → $665,991 · p. 62 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Safety and Security · $255,157 → $271,922 · p. 63 ↗+$16,765
Increased Health Services · $266,885 → $244,633 · p. 62 ↗−$22,252
Site Allocations-School Climate · $94,442 → $154,004 · p. 63 ↗+$59,562
Parent and School Connectedness · $107,435 → $98,541 · p. 62 ↗−$8,894
Professional Development for Behavioral Support · $56,381 → $35,756 · p. 62 ↗−$20,625
How the plan measures it · 11 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 32 ↗.
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends
Student mix
2024–25 · October enrollment count, 2,224 students
1Hispanic or Latino85%
2White9%
3Two or more races3%
4Black or African American1%
5Filipino<1%
6Asian<1%
7Pacific Islander<1%
8American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
9Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.
Free or reduced-price meals
85%
Across California, 63% of students qualify.
2024–25 · 1,879 of 2,223 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.
The district’s state records
Is the state giving the district extra help?
The state is giving Nuview Union extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.
How English learners moved up on the state’s English test
From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 50% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (178 of 358 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.
Which public schools in Nuview Union rank highest?
Elementary: Nuview Elementary, 49th percentile (Developing). Middle: Mountain Shadows Middle, 38th percentile (Developing). High: Nuview Bridge Early College High, 73rd percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
Does living in the Nuview Union district decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (4)
Are the public schools in Nuview Union good?
Nuview Union’s 2 public elementary schools run from the 20th to the 49th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Nuview Union has one public middle school we score, Mountain Shadows Middle, at the 38th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing. Nuview Union has one public high school we score, Nuview Bridge Early College High, at the 73rd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.
How much does Nuview Union spend per student?
Nuview Union spent $19,831 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Nuview Union dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.
What is in Nuview Union’s 2026–27 spending plan?
The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $8.7 million into 21 funded actions in 3 goals, 24% of its $36.7 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $5.6 million, 65% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.
Sources and methodology
This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Nuview Union, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school
Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.