School district · Los Angeles County

El Monte Union High schools

El Monte Union High runs high schools only. Its 5 public high schools run from the 21st to the 72nd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). Elementary and middle school are run by other districts.

High · 5 schools

from 21st to 72nd · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Rosemead High: 72nd percentile, Solid
  • El Monte High: 58th percentile, Solid
  • Arroyo High: 55th percentile, Solid
  • South El Monte High: 41st percentile, Developing
  • Mountain View High: 21st percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
3Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Elementary and middle school: other districts

Confirm the school for your address with the district.

  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around the El Monte Union High district

7 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

High schools

Which high schools in the El Monte Union High district score highest?

Rosemead High is highest, at the 72nd percentile.

That’s higher than 72 in 100 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in the El Monte Union High district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 2 high schools
Context

The average high school in the El Monte Union High district had 17 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools and court and community schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with its own kind or not ranked.

The district

Where does El Monte Union High’s money go, and what does it plan?

The El Monte Union High district spent $25,007 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 51 cents of every El Monte Union High dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction51%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services16%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance14%
  • Other3%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$102.9 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 59 funded actions in 7 goals. That’s 61% of its $168.5 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 122 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 62% of the money. The plan itself puts 83% of it toward staff.

  • Core Program: Teachers $48.3 million
  • Multi-Tiered System of Supports $8.6 million
  • Targeted Engagement Strategies and Individual Mentoring $6.9 million
  • 56 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

11 of the plan’s 59 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.3 million
  • Math $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $2.1 million
  • English learners $4.0 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Academic Support for English Learners$1.4 million
  • EL Support$1.2 million
  • Paraeducators-Long-Term English Learners$900,367
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $40.3 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $40.4 million and estimates it spent $39.3 million, $1.1 million (3%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $1.6 million (2%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Core Program: Teachers, which went from $50.1 million to $48.3 million.

Largest cuts

  • Core Program: Teachers−⁠$1.8 million

Largest increases

  • Online and Personalized Learning (OPL)+⁠$520,183
  • Routine Maintenance+⁠$496,224

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Professional Development through one additional Day$398,936
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 358%62%up 4 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 330%31%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 520 in 10019 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 53.2%3.5%up 0.3 pts

Goals 6 and 7 track named schools and Goals 1, 2 and 4 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Core Program: Teachers · $48,340,091
  • Multi-Tiered System of Supports · $8,578,219
  • Targeted Engagement Strategies and Individual Mentoring · $6,925,424
The full plan7 goals, 35 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($102.9 million).

Where does the money go?

55% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2
G3
G5

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Provide all students with effective, engaging instruction in clean and well- maintained facilities that will…$56.7 million55% of action budgets

“Provide all students with effective, engaging instruction in clean and well- maintained facilities that will allow them to focus on academic achievement” p. 14 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $58.6 million (−⁠$1.8 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Core Program: Teachers$48.3 millionaction 1.5 · p. 73 ↗
  2. Routine Maintenance$6.1 millionaction 1.3 · p. 73 ↗
  3. Professional Development$1.8 millionaction 1.1 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.7 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Professional Development through one additional Day$0.4 millionaction 1.4 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Professional Development through Release Time$0.1 millionaction 1.2 · p. 73 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Core Program: Teachers−⁠$1.8 million$50.1 million → $48.3 million · p. 73 ↗
  2. Routine Maintenance+⁠$0.5 million$5.6 million → $6.1 million · p. 73 ↗
  3. Professional Development+⁠$0.2 million$1.6 million → $1.8 million · p. 73 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Professional Development through one additional Day · $398,936 · p. 73 ↗new or renamed
  • Professional Development through Release Time · $25,000 → $100,000 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$75,000

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 3 quoted

  • Williams Review: Teachers Mis- assigned p. 14 ↗
    Baseline
    14 teachers misassigned (2022-2023)
    Target for year 3
    0 teachers misassigned
  • Williams Review: Teachers Fully Credentialed p. 14 ↗
    Baseline
    100% of teachers are fully credentialed (2022-2023)
    Target for year 3
    100% of teachers are fully credentialed
  • Williams Review: Facilities in Good Repair p. 14 ↗
    Baseline
    All seven (7) high schools have facilities reported as being in "good repair" or better. …
    Target for year 3
    All seven (7) high schools have facilities reported as being in "good repair" or better.
Goal 2Provide all students with the knowledge and skills necessary for them to graduate college and career ready$11.8 million11% of action budgets

16 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $11.2 million (+⁠$595,715) · p. 20 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Online and Personalized Learning (OPL)$1.7 millionaction 2.14 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Career Technical Education (CTE) Program$1.5 millionaction 2.6 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. AVID$1.2 millionaction 2.11 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Student Access to Technology$1.0 millionaction 2.15 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Enrichment Opportunities$0.9 millionaction 2.9 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

11 more funded actions in this goal

  • CTE and AP Course Offerings · action 2.5 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.9 million
  • Technology Resources · action 2.8 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.9 million
  • College and Career Coordinators · action 2.3 · p. 73 ↗$0.9 million
  • Textbooks · action 2.1 · p. 73 ↗$0.8 million
  • Library · action 2.13 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • College and Career Readiness Support Services · action 2.2 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $446,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.5 million
  • CTE Instructional Materials · action 2.4 · p. 73 ↗$0.3 million
  • English Language Arts Support · action 2.12 · p. 74 ↗$0.2 million
  • Hand-on Job Training · action 2.10 · p. 74 ↗$0.2 million
  • Online Math and Reading Programs · action 2.16 · p. 74 ↗$0.1 million
  • Professional Development for CTE Staff · action 2.7 · p. 74 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Online and Personalized Learning (OPL)+⁠$0.5 million$1.2 million → $1.7 million · p. 74 ↗
  2. Student Access to Technology+⁠$100,000$850,000 → $950,000 · p. 74 ↗
  3. AVID+⁠$0.1 million$1.1 million → $1.2 million · p. 74 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Career Technical Education (CTE) Program · $1.5 million → $1.5 million · p. 74 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Enrichment Opportunities · $876,341 → $938,647 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$62,306
  • CTE and AP Course Offerings · $880,775 → $911,707 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$30,932
  • Technology Resources · $893,494 → $910,993 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$17,499
  • College and Career Coordinators · $969,602 → $887,844 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$81,758
  • Textbooks · $818,770 → $813,878 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$4,892
  • Library · $866,560 → $786,728 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$79,832
  • College and Career Readiness Support Services · $436,000 → $470,000 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$34,000
  • CTE Instructional Materials · $260,000 → $260,000 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • English Language Arts Support · $282,650 → $247,735 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$34,915
  • Hand-on Job Training · $150,000 → $150,000 · p. 74 ↗unchanged
  • Online Math and Reading Programs · $70,000 → $70,000 · p. 74 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Development for CTE Staff · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 74 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 7 measures · 1 quoted

  • Local Data: Advanced Placement (AP) Enrollment Rate p. 21 ↗
    Baseline
    26.1% of students were enrolled in the AP program. (2022-2023)
    Target for year 3
    30% of students will be enrolled in the AP program. (2025-2026)

6 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Provide support, resources, and services to ensure every student reaches a high level of academic achievement$15.7 million15% of action budgets

16 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $15.6 million (+⁠$56,659) · p. 29 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Targeted Engagement Strategies and Individual Mentoring$6.9 millionaction 3.1 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Paraeducators$2.7 millionaction 3.2 · p. 75 ↗
  3. Academic Support for English Learners$1.4 millionaction 3.6 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. EL Support$1.2 millionaction 3.8 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Paraeducators-Long-Term English Learners$0.9 millionaction 3.16 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

11 more funded actions in this goal

  • Supplemental Instructional Materials · action 3.10 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $624,242 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Content Specialists/​Course Leads · action 3.4 · p. 75 ↗$0.4 million
  • Summer School Program · action 3.14 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • EL Counselors · action 3.9 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Paraeducators-English Learners · action 3.7 · p. 75 ↗$0.1 million
  • Targeted Tutoring After School · action 3.5 · p. 75 ↗$0.1 million
  • Targeted Tutoring During the Day · action 3.13 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Data Analysis Platform · action 3.17 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Collaboration Time/​Release Days · action 3.11 · p. 75 ↗$0.1 million
  • Educational Leadership · action 3.12 · p. 75 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Summer Bridge Program · action 3.15 · p. 76 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Paraeducators−⁠$0.2 million$2.9 million → $2.7 million · p. 75 ↗
  2. Targeted Engagement Strategies and Individual Mentoring+⁠$0.2 million$6.7 million → $6.9 million · p. 75 ↗
  3. Paraeducators-English Learners−⁠$99,631$235,565 → $135,934 · p. 75 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Academic Support for English Learners · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 75 ↗−⁠$16,526
  • EL Support · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 75 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Paraeducators-Long-Term English Learners · $863,186 → $900,367 · p. 76 ↗+⁠$37,181
  • Supplemental Instructional Materials · $683,975 → $759,542 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$75,567
  • Content Specialists/​Course Leads · $426,358 → $438,975 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$12,617
  • Summer School Program · $400,000 → $400,000 · p. 75 ↗unchanged
  • EL Counselors · $321,866 → $334,287 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$12,421
  • Targeted Tutoring After School · $120,000 → $120,000 · p. 75 ↗unchanged
  • Targeted Tutoring During the Day · $200,000 → $120,000 · p. 75 ↗−⁠$80,000
  • Data Analysis Platform · $50,000 → $80,000 · p. 76 ↗+⁠$30,000
  • Collaboration Time/​Release Days · $15,000 → $65,000 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$50,000
  • Educational Leadership · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 75 ↗unchanged
  • Summer Bridge Program · $30,000 → $25,000 · p. 76 ↗−⁠$5,000

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 29 ↗.

Goal 4Provide parents and families with opportunities to be engaged and empowered to support their children's success$2.0 million2% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.1 million (−⁠$135,620) · p. 41 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Support Staff$494,715action 4.3 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Administrative Support$480,000action 4.1 · p. 76 ↗
  3. Communication$400,000action 4.2 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Site Community Liaisons$321,361action 4.4 · p. 76 ↗
  5. Parent Workshops$271,000action 4.5 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Interpretation/​Translation Services · action 4.7 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$25,000
  • Parent Workshops (All Students) · action 4.6 · p. 76 ↗$7,500

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Site Community Liaisons−⁠$84,639$406,000 → $321,361 · p. 76 ↗
  2. Support Staff−⁠$25,981$520,696 → $494,715 · p. 76 ↗
  3. Interpretation/​Translation Services−⁠$15,000$40,000 → $25,000 · p. 76 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Administrative Support · $480,000 → $480,000 · p. 76 ↗unchanged
  • Communication · $400,000 → $400,000 · p. 76 ↗unchanged
  • Parent Workshops · $281,000 → $271,000 · p. 76 ↗−⁠$10,000
  • Parent Workshops (All Students) · $7,500 → $7,500 · p. 76 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 41 ↗.

Goal 5Provide students with the resources and support necessary to cultivate student well-being and improve student…$16.1 million16% of action budgets

“Provide students with the resources and support necessary to cultivate student well-being and improve student engagement in a safe learning environment” p. 46 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $15.9 million (+⁠$271,612)

Largest funded actions

  1. Multi-Tiered System of Supports$8.6 millionaction 5.1 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. After-school Student Engagement$2.9 millionaction 5.3 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Student Engagement$2.2 millionaction 5.2 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. School Safety-Campus Supervision$2.0 millionaction 5.4 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Resources to Support Student Safety$0.2 millionaction 5.7 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Stage Technician · action 5.6 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Foster Youth Support Services · action 5.5 · p. 76 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Support for Low-Income Students Experiencing Homelessness · action 5.8 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Multi-Tiered System of Supports+⁠$0.1 million$8.5 million → $8.6 million · p. 76 ↗
  2. School Safety-Campus Supervision+⁠$0.1 million$1.9 million → $2.0 million · p. 76 ↗
  3. Student Engagement+⁠$0.1 million$2.1 million → $2.2 million · p. 76 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • After-school Student Engagement · $2.9 million → $2.9 million · p. 76 ↗−⁠$29,300
  • Resources to Support Student Safety · $220,000 → $193,000 · p. 77 ↗−⁠$27,000
  • Stage Technician · $160,456 · p. 76 ↗new or renamed
  • Foster Youth Support Services · $112,588 → $114,862 · p. 76 ↗+⁠$2,274
  • Support for Low-Income Students Experiencing Homelessness · $35,000 → $30,000 · p. 77 ↗−⁠$5,000

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 46 ↗.

Goal 6 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy May 2027, Fernando R. Ledesma High School (FRLHS) will increase engagement and outcomes for English…$458,430under 1% of action budgets

“By May 2027, Fernando R. Ledesma High School (FRLHS) will increase engagement and outcomes for English learners, Homeless, Hispanic, Long Term English Learners, and Socially Economically disadvantaged students by providing targeted resources and support that will allow them to graduate from high school college and career ready, as measured by the college/​career indicator and 5-year graduation rate” p. 53 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.0 million (−⁠$578,471)

Largest funded actions

  1. College and Career Readiness Support$226,819action 6.1 · p. 77 ↗
  2. Expanded Opportunities for Graduation Requirements and Career Development$190,639action 6.2 · p. 77 ↗
  3. Instructional Materials and Resources$22,972action 6.3 · p. 77 ↗
  4. Targeted Engagement Strategies$18,000action 6.4 · p. 77 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Expanded Opportunities for Graduation Requirements and Career Development−⁠$239,361$430,000 → $190,639 · p. 77 ↗
  2. Targeted Engagement Strategies−⁠$182,000$200,000 → $18,000 · p. 77 ↗
  3. Instructional Materials and Resources−⁠$108,929$131,901 → $22,972 · p. 77 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • College and Career Readiness Support · $275,000 → $226,819 · p. 77 ↗−⁠$48,181

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 53 ↗.

Goal 7 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy May 2027, Community Day School will increase engagement and outcomes for all students, including Hispanics…$65,846under 1% of action budgets

“By May 2027, Community Day School will increase engagement and outcomes for all students, including Hispanics and Socio-Economically Disadvantaged students, by providing targeted support in creating a safe and welcoming learning environment that will allow students to engage productively, as measured by the suspension rate” p. 59 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $57,472 (+⁠$8,374)

Largest funded actions

  1. Expanded Learning Program to Support Social and Emotional Development$47,846action 7.2 · p. 77 ↗
  2. Additional Supervision and Counseling$15,000action 7.1 · p. 77 ↗
  3. Targeted Engagement Strategies$3,000action 7.3 · p. 77 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Expanded Learning Program to Support Social and Emotional Development+⁠$37,846$10,000 → $47,846 · p. 77 ↗
  2. Additional Supervision and Counseling−⁠$30,000$45,000 → $15,000 · p. 77 ↗
  3. Targeted Engagement Strategies+⁠$528$2,472 → $3,000 · p. 77 ↗

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 59 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 7,295 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 78%2. Asian: 20%3. White: <1%4. Filipino: <1%5. Two or more races: <1%6. Black or African American: <1%7. Not reported: <1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino78%
  2. Asian20%
  3. White<1%
  4. Filipino<1%
  5. Two or more races<1%
  6. Black or African American<1%
  7. Not reported<1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

90%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 6,583 of 7,278 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

El Monte Union High isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 40% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (405 of 1,019 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Fernando R. Ledesma Continuation High (Most intensive support, graduation rate)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the El Monte Union High district rank highest?

High: Rosemead High, 72nd percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California high schools we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the El Monte Union High district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the El Monte Union High district good?

El Monte Union High’s 5 public high schools run from the 21st to the 72nd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 3 Solid, 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the El Monte Union High district compare with California?

The average high school in the El Monte Union High district had 17 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the El Monte Union High district spend per student?

The El Monte Union High district spent $25,007 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 51 cents of every El Monte Union High dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the El Monte Union High district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $102.9 million into 59 funded actions in 7 goals, 61% of its $168.5 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $56.7 million, 55% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2025 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the El Monte Union High district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024–25

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.