ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Wild Rose School of Creative · Monrovia

Wild Rose School of Creative: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Wild Rose School of Creative posts 34% meeting the standard and 14.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

232 Jasmine Avenue, 91016 (opens in new tab)·Monrovia Unified·Monrovia·Grades TK-6·416 students·66% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 471-2500
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4545
% Exceeded14%21%
% Met+34%43%
Growth+9.5-2.9
Absence16.6%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
45
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #2,465 statewide · #5 of 5 in Monrovia Unified

Wild Rose School of Creative scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 57th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “34% proficient” and call it done. Wild Rose School of Creative deserves a closer read. The school sits in Monrovia, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 48th to the 57th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 34% meet the standard today, versus 45% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 355%35%34%19%33%
Grade 441%32%28%35%25%
Grade 552%50%36%36%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 351%37%44%28%32%
Grade 437%32%33%39%28%
Grade 537%29%29%29%38%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
18%
67%
Grade 3 · 33% proficient
11%
15%
74%
Grade 4 · 26% proficient
18%
28%
54%
Grade 5 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.3pp across grades; the floor rises 13.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.5%
State 21.3%
6.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+9.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
33.8%
State 42.7%
8.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.6%
State 17.9%
1.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.8%
State 18.0%
11.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Wild Rose School of Creative in Monrovia, 27.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wild Rose School of Creative trails its district average for low-income students by 16.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 147 students tested.

All students at this school: 33% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 33%, district —, state 43%33%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 27%, district 38%, state 32%27% · −6 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 37%, state 32%27% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 50%, state 44%36% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 47%, state 42%30% · −3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 15%, state 11%9% · −24 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 68%, district 68%, state 56%68% · +35 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 0%, district 11%, state 15%0% · −33 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +11.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.6%, district 20.7%, state 17.9%16.6% · −1.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (28.2% vs 12.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.2%
TK/K28.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience11.4 years
Fully credentialed89%
First-year teachers10%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$57,572 – $105,149
Principal salary$137,290 – $162,352
Superintendent salary$255,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,737, CA average $14,815$17,737 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,315 per student

$1,315 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,416 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support10%
Student services10%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,843 per pupil
2019$12,947 per pupil
2018$13,518 per pupil
2017$13,173 per pupil
2016$12,850 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic71.9%
District 63.0% · CA 56.1%
White13.9%
District 14.6% · CA 19.9%
Other7.2%
District 9.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.9%
District 9.0% · CA 10.2%
Black3.1%
District 4.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 66.3% (3pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$97K · CA $85K
Median home value$897K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+42% · CA 35%
ZIP population41,140
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 31% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Wild Rose School of Creative a good elementary school?

Wild Rose School of Creative has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 57th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,465 statewide. 14.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Wild Rose School of Creative's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 33.8% of students at Wild Rose School of Creative met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 418 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Wild Rose School of Creative rank in California?

Wild Rose School of Creative ranks #2,465 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 57th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Wild Rose School of Creative getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Wild Rose School of Creative increases by 9.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Wild Rose School of Creative?

16.6% of students at Wild Rose School of Creative are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Wild Rose School of Creative compare to other schools in Monrovia?

Wild Rose School of Creative scores 45/100 (57th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 416 students. Use the schools in Monrovia page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Wild Rose School of Creative serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Wild Rose School of Creative in Monrovia, 27.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wild Rose School of Creative trails its district average for low-income students by 16.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 147 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 43th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+9.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 65th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
33.8%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 43th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 35th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37315%18%32%36%33%−10
Grade 47511%15%29%45%25%−19
Grade 56018%28%25%28%47%−1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37412%20%20%47%32%−13
Grade 4759%19%37%35%28%−14
Grade 56121%16%33%30%38%+2
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116118%13%52%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14727.2%−17−11
Hispanic/Latino15328.1%−17−11
English Learners287.1%−8−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Wild Rose School of Creative ←4514.5%33.8%+9.50.1%
Camino Grove Elementary2.2 mi7554.8%77.3%+5.80.1%
Highland Oaks Elementary2.3 mi7555.8%78.8%+9.90.4%
Mayflower Elementary1 mi6938.5%64.2%+7.70.5%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194148#287416.6%45.5%14.1%0.2%-8.2pp
20224264#206113.8%35.6%23.9%0.0%+3.5pp
20234051#278215.2%34.0%25.6%0.0%-6.0pp
20244251#282313.0%31.0%17.2%0.3%+9.2pp
20254557#246514.5%33.8%16.6%0.1%+9.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female12.9%16.1%+3.2pp
Male15.5%17.0%+1.5pp
Black/African American0.0%15.4%+15.4pp
Hispanic/Latino16.0%18.3%+2.3pp
Students with Disabilities15.6%25.6%+10.0pp
English Learners8.3%16.0%+7.7pp
Homeless28.9%14.3%-14.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.8%19.9%+5.1pp
All Students14.2%16.5%+2.3pp
Asian27.8%
Two or More Races11.8%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction