ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Wayne Ruble Middle · FontanaPublic

Wayne Ruble Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Wayne Ruble posts 44% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

6762 Juniper Avenue, 92336 (opens in new tab)·Fontana Unified·Fontana·Grades 6-8·1,394 students·77% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 357-5530·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4338
% Exceeded20%17%
% Met+44%39%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Average · p55Average · p50
Absence18.1%18.5%
Suspension3.4%3.7%
Scope Score
43
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #752 statewide · #1 of 7 in Fontana Unified

Wayne Ruble Middle scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “44% proficient” and call it done. Wayne Ruble deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fontana, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Wayne Ruble's low-income kids hit 49.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 56th to the 66th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 middle schools.

ELAGreen(Increased)MathYellow(Increased)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 44% of students meet the standard today, above the 40% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 646%40%46%47%46%
Grade 755%49%49%48%55%
Grade 849%50%51%49%58%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 629%21%33%30%35%
Grade 732%28%28%30%36%
Grade 833%23%31%31%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
25%
54%
Grade 6 · 46% proficient
19%
36%
45%
Grade 7 · 55% proficient
24%
34%
42%
Grade 8 · 58% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.3pp across grades; the floor rises 12.5pp. The state average rises 0.1pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

49.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Wayne Ruble's most underrated number

49.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Wayne Ruble low-income: 49.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
19.8%
State 16.8%
2.9pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
43.9%
State 39.3%
4.6pp above state avg
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
Average
State average
The same students gained 47 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
18.1%
State 18.5%
0.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.4%
State 3.7%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
29.8%
State 18.0%
11.8pp above state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 84th percentile of California middle schools in reading and the 54th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 55th. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measuresame cohort, G6→G8SchoolScope growth measure: 55th percentile among California middle schools.55th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 84th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.84th pctile · +12 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +2 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 54th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.54th pctile · +2 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Wayne Ruble Middle in Fontana, 49.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wayne Ruble Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (50.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,060 students tested.

All students at this school: 44% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 44%, district —, state 39%44%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 31%, state 32%40% · −3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 41%, district 32%, state 32%41% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 45%, district 32%, state 42%45% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 43%, district 33%, state 44%43% · −1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 9%, state 15%10% · −34 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 38%, district 28%, state 26%38% · −6 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 7%, state 11%4% · −40 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 47%, district 38%, state 56%47% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 68%, district 54%, state 72%68% · +24 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 83%, district 68%, state 65%83% · +39 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 46%, district 42%, state 56%46% · +2 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.4pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students1,013 studentsLow-income students, reading: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 1,013 students.+11 pts · +14 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students933 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 933 students.+9 pts · +11 vs typical
English Only921 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +13 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 921 students.+13 pts · +13 vs typical
English Learner243 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: +4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 243 students.+4 pts · +9 vs typical
Students with disabilities160 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −10 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 160 students.−10 pts · +3 vs typical
Math
Low-income students1,003 studentsLow-income students, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 1,003 students.0 pts · +5 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students925 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 925 students.−2 pts · +4 vs typical
English Only915 studentsEnglish Only, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 915 students.0 pts · +3 vs typical
English Learner240 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 240 students.+8 pts · +11 vs typical
Students with disabilities159 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 159 students.−4 pts · +4 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.1%, district 24.8%, state 18.5%18.1% · −0.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.4%, district —, state 3.7%3.4% · −0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.1%
Grades 7–820.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Summit HighScope 61direct feeder

The road from this school ends at Summit High, which sent 44 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 23 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Summit High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 75% of Summit High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

44 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 23 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Summit High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 22:126:1
Teaching staff75 teachers
Avg. experience17.3 years
Fully credentialed89%
First-year teachers1%
Intern / emergency permit3.4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,343 – $132,186
Principal salary$155,206 – $180,978
Superintendent salary$366,857

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $29,484, CA average $14,491$29,484 · spent at this school
Federal share$4,309 per student

$4,309 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,037 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,217 per pupil
2019$14,629 per pupil
2018$15,045 per pupil
2017$13,064 per pupil
2016$12,756 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic71.6%
District 85.8% · CA 56.1%
Black11.3%
District 5.2% · CA 4.8%
Other6.5%
District 2.7% · CA 9.0%
White5.4%
District 4.0% · CA 19.9%
Asian5.2%
District 2.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 77.0% (13pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$123K · CA $85K
Median home value$628K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+30% · CA 35%
ZIP population105,517
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,394 students, this school is well above the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Wayne Ruble Middle a good middle school?

Wayne Ruble Middle has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 66th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #752 statewide. 19.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.9 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Wayne Ruble Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.9% of students at Wayne Ruble Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 19.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 19.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,744 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Wayne Ruble Middle rank in California?

Wayne Ruble Middle ranks #752 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 66th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Wayne Ruble Middle getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Wayne Ruble Middle that cohort is 2023 G6 → 2025 G8, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks average among California middle schools — roughly the 55th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the middle Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Wayne Ruble Middle?

18.1% of students at Wayne Ruble Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Wayne Ruble Middle compare to other schools in Fontana?

Wayne Ruble Middle scores 43/100 (66th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,394 students. Use the schools in Fontana page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Wayne Ruble Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Wayne Ruble Middle in Fontana, 49.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wayne Ruble Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (50.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,060 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
19.8%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 53th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
43.9%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 54th pctile
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) · 20%
Average
↑ vs CA average · 55th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.1%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
▲ 1.6pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
3.4%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
▼ 0.6pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
29.8%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 646321%25%24%30%46%−0
Grade 744419%36%20%24%55%+8
Grade 846724%34%23%19%58%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 646020%15%26%39%35%+1
Grade 744416%20%28%36%36%+2
Grade 846619%14%23%44%33%+1

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide46913%20%56%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1,06049.0%+11+11
Hispanic/Latino98350.3%+11+11
Students with Disabilities16912.5%+1−4
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Wayne Ruble Middle ←4319.8%43.9%+5.3pp+47 pts3.4%
Alder Middle1.6 mi327.4%25.7%+4.2pp3.2%
Ethel Kucera Middle2.5 mi3011.0%32.9%−4.6pp7.7%
Almeria Middle1.7 mi277.4%22.3%+4.4pp1.3%
California average3816.8%39.3%+1.5pp3.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193756#87715.2%40.5%8.5%2.5%+3.8pp
20223455#96613.7%35.1%28.0%3.9%+5.4pp
20233967#71118.1%39.6%20.6%4.4%+1.6pp
20244674#58417.1%39.3%16.5%4.0%+1.5pp
20254366#75219.8%43.9%18.1%3.4%+5.3pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.2%18.8%+10.6pp
Male8.7%17.4%+8.7pp
Asian3.0%11.1%+8.1pp
Black/African American7.1%13.8%+6.7pp
White6.7%5.8%-0.9pp
Hispanic/Latino8.5%19.9%+11.4pp
Two or More Races3.0%25.7%+22.7pp
Students with Disabilities12.7%23.8%+11.1pp
English Learners10.4%18.3%+7.9pp
Foster Youth4.5%28.6%+24.1pp
Homeless40.9%29.6%-11.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.4%20.3%+10.9pp
All Students8.5%18.1%+9.6pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+121,293Accelerated+21,283Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+111,013Accelerated01,003Average
Hispanic or Latino+9933Accelerated−2925Average
English Only+13921not categorised0915not categorised
English Learner+4243Average+8240Accelerated
Students with Disabilities−10160Moderate−4159Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+17152not categorised+16152not categorised
Black or African American+23136Exceptional+1135Average
English Learners Only−1191not categorised−388not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)084Average−382Average
White+1672Accelerated+672Accelerated
Asian+2265Exceptional+2364Exceptional
Filipino+1550Accelerated+2750Exceptional
Two or More Races+430Average+1530Accelerated
Homeless Youth−319Average+919Accelerated

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/wayne-ruble-middle-2509"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Wayne Ruble Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction