ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Wanda Hirsch Elementary · Tracy

Wanda Hirsch Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Wanda Hirsch posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1280 Dove Drive, 95376 (opens in new tab)·Tracy Joint Unified·Tracy·Grades TK-5·359 students·65% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 830-3312·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2645
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+29%43%
Growth-14.1-2.9
Absence19.6%17.9%
Suspension4.7%1.6%
Scope Score
26
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,218 statewide · #5 of 11 in Tracy Joint Unified

Wanda Hirsch Elementary scores 26 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 9th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “29% proficient” and call it done. Wanda Hirsch deserves a closer read. The school sits in Tracy, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 44th to the 9th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARed(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 29% meet the standard today, versus 47% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%49%42%40%33%
Grade 453%40%54%33%25%
Grade 551%38%46%46%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 356%50%42%45%39%
Grade 441%33%44%29%31%
Grade 529%30%35%31%14%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

22%
12%
66%
Grade 3 · 34% proficient
18%
76%
Grade 4 · 24% proficient
10%
20%
70%
Grade 5 · 30% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.9%
State 21.3%
10.4pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-14.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
28.7%
State 42.7%
14.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.6%
State 17.9%
1.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.7%
State 1.6%
3.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.1%
State 18.0%
3.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Wanda Hirsch Elementary in Tracy, 24.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wanda Hirsch Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 8.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 149 students tested.

All students at this school: 29% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 29%, district —, state 43%29%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 24%, district 28%, state 32%24% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 25%, district 35%, state 44%25% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 32%, district 34%, state 42%32% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 26%, state 32%23% · −6 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 9%, state 11%9% · −19 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 26%, district 43%, state 56%26% · −3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 35%, district 52%, state 72%35% · +6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 10%, state 15%6% · −22 vs school

7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 5.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -3.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.6%, district 23.3%, state 17.9%19.6% · +1.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.7%, district —, state 1.6%4.7% · +3.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (36.8% vs 17.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–617.9%
TK/K36.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 22:122:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience15.4 years
Fully credentialed95%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit5.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,685 – $125,350
Principal salary$172,441 – $194,479
Superintendent salary$298,140

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,834, CA average $14,815$19,834 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,484 per student

$1,484 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,013 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support14%
Student services11%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,939 per pupil
2019$11,523 per pupil
2018$12,026 per pupil
2017$10,666 per pupil
2016$10,305 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic44.6%
District 54.0% · CA 56.1%
White18.1%
District 13.8% · CA 19.9%
Asian18.1%
District 16.0% · CA 10.2%
Other13.4%
District 11.0% · CA 9.0%
Black5.8%
District 5.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 64.6% (1pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$618K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+21% · CA 35%
ZIP population54,488
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 21% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Wanda Hirsch Elementary a good elementary school?

Wanda Hirsch Elementary has a Scope Score of 26 out of 100, placing it in the 9th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,218 statewide. 10.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.4 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Wanda Hirsch Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 28.7% of students at Wanda Hirsch Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 408 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Wanda Hirsch Elementary rank in California?

Wanda Hirsch Elementary ranks #5,218 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 9th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Wanda Hirsch Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Wanda Hirsch Elementary decreases by 14.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Wanda Hirsch Elementary?

19.6% of students at Wanda Hirsch Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Wanda Hirsch Elementary compare to other schools in Tracy?

Wanda Hirsch Elementary scores 26/100 (9th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 359 students. Use the schools in Tracy page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Wanda Hirsch Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Wanda Hirsch Elementary in Tracy, 24.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wanda Hirsch Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 8.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 149 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.9%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 40th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-14.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 25th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
28.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 39th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.7%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 25th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36922%12%33%33%33%−10
Grade 4656%18%20%55%25%−20
Grade 57010%20%19%51%30%−18
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36917%22%22%39%39%−7
Grade 4656%25%29%40%31%−11
Grade 5704%10%31%54%14%−21
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11704%17%64%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14924.8%−9−13
Hispanic/Latino9726.8%−6−12
English Learners434.7%−4−6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Wanda Hirsch Elementary ←2610.9%28.7%−14.14.7%
Corral Hollow Elementary2.6 mi7547.8%75.5%+6.51.0%
Art Freiler2.5 mi4918.0%43.0%+21.48.6%
Gladys Poet-Christian Elementary0.7 mi4620.7%44.5%−5.85.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194044#309918.7%46.9%10.1%1.8%-13.6pp
20222518#467912.2%39.8%27.1%4.2%-15.5pp
20234155#258616.8%43.8%24.6%3.4%-1.4pp
20243326#426013.3%37.4%20.3%3.8%-4.0pp
2025269#521810.9%28.7%19.6%4.7%-14.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.5%20.6%+11.1pp
Male10.7%18.8%+8.1pp
Asian5.1%18.3%+13.2pp
Black/African American20.0%25.0%+5.0pp
White0.0%11.1%+11.1pp
Hispanic/Latino10.5%19.3%+8.8pp
Two or More Races8.9%13.8%+4.9pp
Students with Disabilities14.5%18.4%+3.9pp
English Learners10.1%10.6%+0.5pp
Homeless16.7%22.6%+5.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.5%24.4%+8.9pp
All Students10.1%19.7%+9.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction