Twin Lakes Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Twin Lakes posts 25% meeting the standard and 10.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 42 | 10% | 25% | +25.8 | 15.0% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Twin Lakes Elementary scores 42 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 49th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “25% proficient” and call it done. Twin Lakes deserves a closer read. The school sits in El Monte, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 35th to the 49th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 25% meet the standard today, versus 30% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 30% | 24% | 31% | 26% | 9% |
| Grade 4 | 32% | 31% | 32% | 29% | 25% |
| Grade 5 | 45% | 29% | 15% | 33% | 47% |
| Grade 6 | 46% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 33% |
| Grade 7 | — | 34% | 20% | 25% | 20% |
| Grade 8 | — | 29% | 25% | 16% | 32% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 35% | 22% | 30% | 23% | 17% |
| Grade 4 | 18% | 17% | 25% | 34% | 22% |
| Grade 5 | 23% | 9% | 11% | 25% | 30% |
| Grade 6 | 29% | 23% | 35% | 9% | 19% |
| Grade 7 | — | 16% | 13% | 19% | 13% |
| Grade 8 | — | 9% | 16% | 8% | 20% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 20.0pp across grades; the floor rises 38.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Twin Lakes Elementary in El Monte, 27.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Twin Lakes Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (24.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 449 students tested.
7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 41.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +11.0pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$765 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 16% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Twin Lakes Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Twin Lakes Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Twin Lakes Elementary rank in California?
Is Twin Lakes Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Twin Lakes Elementary?
How does Twin Lakes Elementary compare to other schools in El Monte?
How does Twin Lakes Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 58
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 38
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 55
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 0% | 9% | 35% | 57% | 9% | −35 |
| Grade 4 | 64 | 11% | 14% | 14% | 61% | 25% | −20 |
| Grade 5 | 55 | 20% | 27% | 25% | 27% | 47% | −1 |
| Grade 6 | 64 | 14% | 19% | 30% | 38% | 33% | −14 |
| Grade 7 | 121 | 3% | 17% | 22% | 58% | 20% | −28 |
| Grade 8 | 163 | 7% | 25% | 25% | 44% | 32% | −14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 0% | 17% | 22% | 61% | 17% | −28 |
| Grade 4 | 64 | 11% | 11% | 22% | 56% | 22% | −20 |
| Grade 5 | 56 | 20% | 11% | 36% | 34% | 30% | −5 |
| Grade 6 | 64 | 9% | 9% | 23% | 58% | 19% | −16 |
| Grade 7 | 121 | 3% | 10% | 17% | 70% | 13% | −21 |
| Grade 8 | 163 | 7% | 13% | 29% | 50% | 20% | −12 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 219 | 3% | 13% | 64% | 19% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 449 | 27.8% | −3 | −10 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 443 | 24.8% | −6 | −14 |
| English Learners | 164 | 5.5% | −3 | −5 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Lakes Elementary ← | — | 42 | 10.3% | 25.1% | +25.8 | 1.1% |
| Longley Way Elementary | 3.3 mi | 58 | 37.3% | 66.4% | +5.0 | 0.4% |
| Cleminson Elementary | 2.5 mi | 58 | 32.2% | 55.1% | +10.9 | 0.7% |
| Gidley Elementary | 2.6 mi | 58 | 20.5% | 52.2% | +6.7 | 2.5% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 36 | 35 | #3593 | 10.5% | 30.4% | 5.6% | 2.0% | +1.2pp |
| 2022 | 25 | 21 | #4549 | 5.3% | 22.1% | 37.7% | 7.5% | -4.4pp |
| 2023 | 17 | 3 | #5578 | 8.8% | 23.9% | 22.7% | 11.7% | -17.5pp |
| 2024 | 38 | 41 | #3379 | 9.3% | 28.4% | 16.2% | 4.3% | +4.4pp |
| 2025 | 42 | 49 | #2921 | 10.3% | 25.1% | 15.0% | 1.1% | +25.8pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 10 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.0% | 15.9% | +10.9pp |
| Male | 6.0% | 13.7% | +7.7pp |
| Asian | 4.0% | 2.7% | -1.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 5.7% | 15.7% | +10.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 5.3% | 31.1% | +25.8pp |
| English Learners | 4.8% | 15.9% | +11.1pp |
| Homeless | 12.8% | 13.1% | +0.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 5.7% | 15.0% | +9.3pp |
| All Students | 5.5% | 14.7% | +9.2pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction