ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Sullivan Language Immersion Academy · Fairfield

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.8% vs 1.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2195 Union Avenue, 94533 (opens in new tab)·Fairfield-Suisun Unified·Fairfield·Grades TK-5·455 students·73% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(707) 366-0685·Website
Alternative school — serves students who benefit from a non-traditional educational setting. Scores are not directly comparable to comprehensive schools.
2023–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2845
% Exceeded8%21%
% Met+24%43%
Growth-11.7-2.9
Absence16.9%17.9%
Suspension0.8%1.6%
Scope Score
28
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,030 statewide · #11 of 19 in Fairfield-Suisun Unified

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 12th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. Sullivan Language Immersion Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fairfield, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 12th percentile since 2023.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade202320242025
Grade 321%39%27%
Grade 416%16%29%
Grade 521%24%13%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade202320242025
Grade 328%49%29%
Grade 434%23%29%
Grade 516%18%19%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
19%
73%
Grade 3 · 27% proficient
13%
16%
71%
Grade 4 · 29% proficient
11%
87%
Grade 5 · 13% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.8%
State 21.3%
13.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-11.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
24.3%
State 42.7%
18.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.9%
State 17.9%
1.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.8%
State 1.6%
0.8pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
8.4%
State 18.0%
9.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Sullivan Language Immersion Academy in Fairfield, 16.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sullivan Language Immersion Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 14.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 128 students tested.

All students at this school: 25% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 25%, district —, state 43%25%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 24%, district 25%, state 32%24% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 25%, state 32%20% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 27%, district 36%, state 44%27% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 6%, state 11%5% · −19 vs school
MaleMale: this school 20%, district 34%, state 42%20% · −4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 9%, state 15%9% · −15 vs school

7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 7.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.9%, district 26.2%, state 17.9%16.9% · −1.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.8%, district —, state 1.6%0.8% · −0.8pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (24.1% vs 12.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.0%
TK/K24.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Sullivan Language Immersion Ac…
28/100
This school
High School

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 25:124:1
Teaching staff23 teachers
Avg. experience8.9 years
First-year teachers26%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,302 – $114,523
Principal salary$155,387 – $178,357
Superintendent salary$270,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $14,823, CA average $14,815$14,823 · spent at this school
Federal share$324 per student

$324 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,888 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction56%
Instruction support11%
Student services13%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,661 per pupil
2019$10,889 per pupil
2018$11,182 per pupil
2017$10,661 per pupil
2016$10,293 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic90.5%
District 47.9% · CA 56.1%
Other3.3%
District 20.7% · CA 9.0%
White3.1%
District 12.4% · CA 19.9%
Black2.9%
District 12.5% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.2%
District 6.5% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 73.0% (9pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$87K · CA $85K
Median home value$542K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+20% · CA 35%
ZIP population78,805
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 11% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sullivan Language Immersion Academy a good elementary school?

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy has a Scope Score of 28 out of 100, placing it in the 12th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,030 statewide. 7.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Sullivan Language Immersion Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 24.3% of students at Sullivan Language Immersion Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 342 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Sullivan Language Immersion Academy rank in California?

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy ranks #5,030 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 12th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Sullivan Language Immersion Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Sullivan Language Immersion Academy decreases by 11.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Sullivan Language Immersion Academy?

16.9% of students at Sullivan Language Immersion Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.8%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Sullivan Language Immersion Academy compare to other schools in Fairfield?

Sullivan Language Immersion Academy scores 28/100 (12th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 455 students. Use the schools in Fairfield page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Sullivan Language Immersion Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Sullivan Language Immersion Academy in Fairfield, 16.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sullivan Language Immersion Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 14.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 128 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
7.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 37th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-11.7pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 34th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
24.3%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 36th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.8%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 57th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
8.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 38th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3638%19%22%51%27%−16
Grade 45513%16%15%56%29%−16
Grade 5532%11%28%58%13%−35
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36310%19%24%48%29%−17
Grade 45511%18%40%31%29%−13
Grade 5534%15%32%49%19%−16
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11530%11%64%25%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12816.4%−14−22
Hispanic/Latino16122.4%−9−16
English Learners754.0%−3−6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Sullivan Language Immersion Academy ←287.8%24.3%−11.70.8%
K. I. Jones Elementary0.9 mi5329.4%56.1%+11.23.5%
Virtual Academy of Fairfield-Suisun1.3 mi4416.8%32.5%+13.20.3%
Crescent Elementary2.4 mi4013.1%35.3%−10.81.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20232615#48367.8%22.7%22.6%3.1%-6.0pp
20242916#48208.2%28.1%18.0%0.3%-22.9pp
20252812#50307.8%24.3%16.9%0.8%-11.7pp
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 22 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female19.1%
Male14.1%
Black/African American28.6%
Hispanic/Latino17.2%
Two or More Races15.4%
Students with Disabilities18.4%
English Learners15.7%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19.5%
All Students16.8%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction