Stone Creek Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Stone Creek posts 53.0% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 76 | 53% | 75% | +8.8 | 8.1% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Stone Creek Elementary scores 76 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 96th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “75% proficient” and call it done. Stone Creek deserves a closer read. It sits at the 96th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Stone Creek's low-income kids hit 65.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 96th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 75% meet the standard today, versus 81% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 76% | 77% | 80% | 75% | 64% |
| Grade 4 | 87% | 87% | 83% | 71% | 87% |
| Grade 5 | 79% | 83% | 84% | 81% | 73% |
| Grade 6 | 77% | 83% | 88% | 85% | 79% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 79% | 86% | 75% | 79% | 66% |
| Grade 4 | 83% | 77% | 88% | 79% | 84% |
| Grade 5 | 79% | 67% | 68% | 72% | 75% |
| Grade 6 | 70% | 85% | 82% | 89% | 80% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 4.2pp across grades; the floor rises 8.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Stone Creek Elementary in Irvine, 65.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 58.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Stone Creek Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 6.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (64.3% Math proficient); Asian students (76.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 29 students tested.
6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly three times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (15.6% vs 4.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 70% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Stone Creek Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Stone Creek Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Stone Creek Elementary rank in California?
Is Stone Creek Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Stone Creek Elementary?
How does Stone Creek Elementary compare to other schools in Irvine?
How does Stone Creek Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 89
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 71
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 61 | 49% | 15% | 26% | 10% | 64% | +21 |
| Grade 4 | 61 | 66% | 21% | 8% | 5% | 87% | +42 |
| Grade 5 | 73 | 53% | 19% | 23% | 4% | 73% | +25 |
| Grade 6 | 89 | 54% | 25% | 13% | 8% | 79% | +32 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 64 | 42% | 23% | 25% | 9% | 66% | +20 |
| Grade 4 | 67 | 57% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 84% | +42 |
| Grade 5 | 75 | 51% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 75% | +39 |
| Grade 6 | 91 | 60% | 20% | 11% | 9% | 80% | +45 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 76 | 45% | 25% | 26% | 4% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 29 | 65.5% | +7 | +27 |
| Asian | 107 | 76.6% | −4 | +2 |
| White | 88 | 79.5% | +9 | +18 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stone Creek Elementary ← | — | 76 | 53.0% | 74.5% | +8.8 | 1.0% |
| Santiago Hills Elementary | 3.3 mi | 95 | 66.6% | 86.0% | +3.7 | 0.7% |
| Deerfield Elementary | 0.8 mi | 88 | 55.7% | 75.7% | +9.1 | 0.9% |
| Eastshore Elementary | 0.4 mi | 85 | 61.1% | 79.4% | +10.7 | 0.7% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 79 | 96 | #193 | 55.1% | 80.5% | 4.8% | 0.2% | +1.6pp |
| 2022 | 68 | 93 | #405 | 52.6% | 79.3% | 12.1% | 0.2% | -6.2pp |
| 2023 | 75 | 95 | #260 | 53.9% | 79.7% | 9.4% | 0.0% | -1.0pp |
| 2024 | 69 | 91 | #508 | 49.6% | 76.2% | 8.7% | 0.1% | -0.7pp |
| 2025 | 76 | 96 | #251 | 53.0% | 74.5% | 8.1% | 1.0% | +8.8pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.7% | 8.7% | +4.0pp |
| Male | 4.7% | 6.2% | +1.5pp |
| Asian | 4.5% | 5.5% | +1.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 9.7% | 9.1% | -0.6pp |
| Two or More Races | 3.2% | 2.8% | -0.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 3.6% | 8.7% | +5.1pp |
| English Learners | 6.8% | 4.6% | -2.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.4% | 11.2% | +0.8pp |
| All Students | 4.7% | 7.4% | +2.7pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction