ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet · San Jose

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet: More than half of kids exceed the standard. But math slips between grade 3 and grade 5.

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet is one of the strongest elementary schools in San Jose by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.

3001 Ross Avenue, 95124 (opens in new tab)·Cambrian·San Jose·Grades K-8·491 students·5% low-income·Magnet·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 377-3022·Website
Magnet program — specialized public school with themed curriculum. Enrollment via district lottery, not neighborhood-based.
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7245
% Exceeded54%21%
% Met+84%43%
Growth-2.8-2.9
Absence3.7%17.9%
Suspension1.4%1.6%
Scope Score
72
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #421 statewide · #2 of 5 in Cambrian

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet scores 72 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “84% proficient” and call it done. Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet deserves a closer read. It sits at the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The headline number: 54.4% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 93rd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 84% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 386%88%83%65%81%
Grade 480%78%80%87%77%
Grade 583%86%83%77%83%
Grade 682%90%77%85%78%
Grade 788%82%90%77%90%
Grade 883%88%81%84%78%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 388%90%92%74%94%
Grade 489%88%87%92%82%
Grade 574%69%80%70%86%
Grade 682%61%62%75%69%
Grade 783%73%83%88%90%
Grade 871%67%67%93%83%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
54.4%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 3→5
2.8pp

math proficiency runs 94% in grade 3 against 86% in grade 5, while reading holds (81% to 83%). The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

56%
25%
19%
Grade 3 · 81% proficient
55%
22%
23%
Grade 4 · 77% proficient
42%
41%
17%
Grade 5 · 83% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 13.9pp across grades; the floor rises 1.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
54.4%
State 21.3%
33.1pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-2.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
83.8%
State 42.7%
41.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
3.7%
State 17.9%
14.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.4%
State 1.6%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
27.8%
State 18.0%
9.8pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet in San Jose, 90.4% of asian students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 86.8% district-wide and 74.4% statewide. Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet outperforms its district average for asian students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Asian students (92.6% Math proficient); White students (80.6% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested.

All students at this school: 82% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 82%, district —, state 43%82%
FemaleFemale: this school 85%, district 66%, state 44%85% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 79%, district 66%, state 42%79% · −3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 91%, district 87%, state 72%91% · +9 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 83%, district 75%, state 56%83% · +1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 82%, district 74%, state 56%82% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 59%, district 38%, state 32%59% · −23 vs school

5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 3.7%, district 8.3%, state 17.9%3.7% · −14.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.4%, district —, state 1.6%1.4% · −0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–63.3%
Grades 7–83.4%
TK/K0.0%

Where the path goes

The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
Elementary
Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magne…
72
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 22:123:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience16.6 years
Fully credentialed98%
First-year teachers4%

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,198, CA average $14,815$16,198 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$120 per student

$120 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,819 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support11%
Student services7%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,708 per pupil
2019$12,547 per pupil
2018$11,134 per pupil
2017$10,879 per pupil
2016$10,588 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian40.5%
District 22.4% · CA 10.2%
White32.6%
District 30.3% · CA 19.9%
Other15.1%
District 15.8% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic9.6%
District 29.5% · CA 56.1%
Black2.2%
District 2.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 4.7% (59pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$186K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.67M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+62% · CA 35%
ZIP population52,096
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 77% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet a good elementary school?

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet has a Scope Score of 72 out of 100, placing it in the 93rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #421 statewide. 54.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 33.1 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 83.8% of students at Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 54.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 29.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 54.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 334 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet rank in California?

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet ranks #421 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 93rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet decreases by 2.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet?

3.7% of students at Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.4%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet compare to other schools in San Jose?

Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet scores 72/100 (93rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 491 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet in San Jose, 90.4% of asian students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 86.8% district-wide and 74.4% statewide. Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet outperforms its district average for asian students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Asian students (92.6% Math proficient); White students (80.6% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
54.4%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 82th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-2.8pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 47th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
83.8%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 81th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
3.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 73th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.4%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 52th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
27.8%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 64th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34856%25%15%4%81%+38
Grade 46055%22%17%7%77%+32
Grade 55942%41%14%3%83%+35
Grade 65941%37%12%10%78%+31
Grade 75862%28%9%2%90%+42
Grade 86040%38%17%5%78%+32
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34858%35%6%0%94%+48
Grade 46052%30%13%5%82%+40
Grade 55963%24%5%8%86%+51
Grade 65951%19%15%15%69%+34
Grade 75872%17%10%0%90%+56
Grade 86072%12%8%8%83%+51
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1111947%30%20%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Asian13590.4%+4+16
White10880.6%+4+19
Two or More Races2580.0%+4+19
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Steindorf STEAM K-8 Magnet ←7254.4%83.8%−2.81.4%
Alta Vista Elementary2.2 mi8460.1%80.5%+5.50.4%
Oster Elementary0.8 mi8057.9%78.3%+2.11.2%
Blossom Hill Elementary2.9 mi7854.7%79.0%+4.90.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197292#46261.0%83.5%1.3%1.2%-8.8pp
20226591#50657.1%83.1%2.8%1.0%-10.8pp
20237897#18461.2%84.3%5.0%1.6%-5.8pp
20246487#75054.8%77.3%5.0%0.3%+3.8pp
20257293#42154.4%83.8%3.7%1.4%-2.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female1.2%1.7%+0.5pp
Male1.2%3.1%+1.9pp
Asian0.7%2.0%+1.3pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino5.1%2.1%-3.0pp
Two or More Races0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Students with Disabilities2.2%4.8%+2.6pp
English Learners5.0%0.0%-5.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged0.0%3.8%+3.8pp
All Students1.2%2.4%+1.2pp
Black/African American9.1%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction