Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.
Stanwood A. Murphy pairs 79% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 84 | 42% | 79% | +16.4 | 15.8% | 0.7% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary scores 84 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 99th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “79% proficient” and call it done. Stanwood A. Murphy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Scotia, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Stanwood A. Murphy's low-income kids hit 67.3% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 36th to the 99th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 3500 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 79% of students meet the standard today, above the 44% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 55% | 30% | 8% | 41% | 83% |
| Grade 4 | 61% | 42% | 18% | 35% | 56% |
| Grade 5 | 33% | 16% | 62% | 64% | 94% |
| Grade 6 | 50% | 25% | 35% | 57% | 50% |
| Grade 7 | 48% | 61% | 29% | 52% | 78% |
| Grade 8 | 61% | 70% | 47% | 22% | 57% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42% | 52% | 25% | 65% | 78% |
| Grade 4 | 50% | 24% | 27% | 18% | 61% |
| Grade 5 | 24% | 26% | 26% | 73% | 100% |
| Grade 6 | 54% | 44% | 50% | 48% | 75% |
| Grade 7 | 35% | 56% | 31% | 33% | 61% |
| Grade 8 | 72% | 45% | 44% | 22% | 61% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 16.6pp across grades; the floor rises 11.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Stanwood A. Murphy's most underrated number
67.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary in Scotia, 67.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 67.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (71.4% Math proficient); White students (65.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.6 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 98 students tested.
7 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +12.1pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly three times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (29.2% vs 8.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$6,902 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 187 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 57% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary rank in California?
Is Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary?
How does Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary compare to other schools in Scotia?
How does Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 48% | 35% | 17% | 0% | 83% | +39 |
| Grade 4 | 18 | 22% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 56% | +11 |
| Grade 5 | 16 | 31% | 63% | 6% | 0% | 94% | +46 |
| Grade 6 | 24 | 17% | 33% | 46% | 4% | 50% | +3 |
| Grade 7 | 23 | 30% | 48% | 17% | 4% | 78% | +31 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 14% | 43% | 25% | 18% | 57% | +11 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 35% | 43% | 17% | 4% | 78% | +33 |
| Grade 4 | 18 | 22% | 39% | 28% | 11% | 61% | +20 |
| Grade 5 | 16 | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 100% | +65 |
| Grade 6 | 24 | 58% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 75% | +40 |
| Grade 7 | 23 | 35% | 26% | 30% | 9% | 61% | +27 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 25% | 36% | 7% | 32% | 61% | +28 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 44 | 14% | 43% | 36% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 98 | 67.3% | +0 | +29 |
| White | 90 | 65.6% | +0 | +4 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanwood A. Murphy Elementary ← | — | 84 | 42.0% | 78.5% | +16.4 | 0.7% |
| Eagle Prairie Elementary | 1.3 mi | 72 | 35.5% | 61.5% | +16.5 | 1.8% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 37 | 36 | #3523 | 8.6% | 44.2% | 17.3% | 2.9% | -20.0pp |
| 2022 | 25 | 20 | #4576 | 10.3% | 31.6% | 21.8% | 0.5% | -19.7pp |
| 2023 | 37 | 45 | #3155 | 6.9% | 27.8% | 35.0% | 2.5% | +27.4pp |
| 2024 | 64 | 87 | #742 | 19.6% | 49.2% | 27.3% | 1.1% | +15.2pp |
| 2025 | 84 | 99 | #68 | 42.0% | 78.5% | 15.8% | 0.7% | +16.4pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 24.4% | 16.5% | -7.9pp |
| Male | 11.9% | 14.0% | +2.1pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 37.0% | 27.3% | -9.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 11.5% | 0.0% | -11.5pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 9.7% | 15.0% | +5.3pp |
| English Learners | 58.3% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 19.6% | 17.8% | -1.8pp |
| All Students | 17.6% | 15.2% | -2.4pp |
| Homeless | — | 18.2% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction