ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac · PalmdaleMagnet

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac posts low test scores — and the same students gain more here than at most schools between grade 6 and grade 8. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

Magnet program — specialized public school with themed curriculum. Enrollment via district lottery, not neighborhood-based.
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2438
% Exceeded5%17%
% Met+19%39%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Strong · p82Average · p50
Absence38.8%18.5%
Suspension9.4%3.7%
Scope Score
24
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #1,748 statewide · #4 of 13 in Palmdale Elementary

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac scores 24 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 22nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “19% proficient” and call it done. Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac deserves a closer read. It sits at the 22nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 1st to the 22nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.

ELAYellow(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 19% of students meet the standard today, above the 13% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 616%15%14%17%22%
Grade 720%23%16%15%26%
Grade 823%23%22%19%31%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 65%7%8%8%16%
Grade 78%7%7%5%8%
Grade 85%5%5%9%12%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
78%
Grade 6 · 22% proficient
22%
74%
Grade 7 · 26% proficient
25%
68%
Grade 8 · 32% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
4.5%
State 16.8%
12.3pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
19.3%
State 39.3%
20.0pp below state avg
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
Strong
State average
The same students gained 55 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
38.8%
State 18.5%
20.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
9.4%
State 3.7%
5.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.8%
State 18.0%
8.1pp below state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 79th percentile of California middle schools in reading and the 43rd in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 82nd. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measuresame cohort, G6→G8SchoolScope growth measure: 82nd percentile among California middle schools.82nd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 79th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.79th pctile · +10 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −2 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 43rd percentile of 7,518 reported schools.43rd pctile · −2 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac in Palmdale, 24.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 673 students tested.

All students at this school: 19% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 19%, district —, state 39%19%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 18%, district 22%, state 32%18% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 26%, state 32%21% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 20%, district 24%, state 42%20% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 19%, district 25%, state 44%19% · −0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 6%, state 15%5% · −14 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 1%, district 5%, state 11%1% · −18 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 9%, district 13%, state 26%9% · −11 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 42%, district 34%, state 56%42% · +22 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 9.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.0pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students592 studentsLow-income students, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 592 students.+9 pts · +12 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students487 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 487 students.+10 pts · +12 vs typical
English Only364 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 364 students.+6 pts · +6 vs typical
English Learner216 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: +4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 216 students.+4 pts · +9 vs typical
Students with disabilities148 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 148 students.−1 pts · +12 vs typical
Math
Low-income students591 studentsLow-income students, math: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 591 students.−1 pts · +4 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students486 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 486 students.−3 pts · +3 vs typical
English Only364 studentsEnglish Only, math: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 364 students.−3 pts · 0 vs typical
English Learner215 studentsEnglish Learner, math: −5 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 215 students.−5 pts · −2 vs typical
Students with disabilities147 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: +2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 147 students.+2 pts · +10 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 38.8%, district 29.9%, state 18.5%38.8% · +20.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 9.4%, district —, state 3.7%9.4% · +5.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–635.9%
Grades 7–840.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Middle
Space Aeronautics Gateway to E…Magnet
24/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Palmdale Academy CharterScope 49estimated path

The road from this school ends at Palmdale Academy Charter, which sent 6 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 13 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Palmdale Academy Charter around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still.

6 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 13 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Palmdale Academy Charter's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff39 teachers
Avg. experience8.4 years
Fully credentialed81%
First-year teachers13%
Intern / emergency permit0.4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$58,752 – $131,333
Principal salary$148,872 – $157,080
Superintendent salary$334,851

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,023, CA average $14,491$24,023 · spent at this school
Federal share$890 per student

$890 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,456 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support11%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,361 per pupil
2019$14,286 per pupil
2018$13,697 per pupil
2017$12,106 per pupil
2016$11,281 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic74.8%
District 78.6% · CA 56.1%
Black20.0%
District 12.5% · CA 4.8%
White2.5%
District 4.0% · CA 19.9%
Other2.5%
District 4.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.1%
District 0.6% · CA 10.2%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$62K · CA $85K
Median home value$421K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+10% · CA 35%
ZIP population80,645
Median age31 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac a good middle school?

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac has a Scope Score of 24 out of 100, placing it in the 22nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,748 statewide. 4.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.3 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 19.3% of students at Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 4.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 4.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,485 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac rank in California?

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac ranks #1,748 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac that cohort is 2023 G6 → 2025 G8, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California middle schools — roughly the 82nd percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the middle Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac?

38.8% of students at Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 9.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac compare to other schools in Palmdale?

Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac scores 24/100 (22nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Palmdale page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac in Palmdale, 24.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 673 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
4.5%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 36th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
19.3%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 34th pctile
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) · 20%
Strong
↑ vs CA average · 82th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
38.8%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 22th pctile
▼ 1.4pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
9.4%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 27th pctile
▲ 2.5pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 34th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62547%15%31%47%22%−24
Grade 72264%22%25%49%26%−22
Grade 82617%25%27%42%31%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62555%11%16%68%16%−18
Grade 72291%7%12%79%8%−25
Grade 82603%10%20%68%12%−20

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide2622%7%60%31%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged67324.4%−3−14
Hispanic/Latino54528.5%−3−10
Students with Disabilities1587.6%+0−9
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac ←244.5%19.3%+2.6pp+55 pts9.4%
Desert Willow Fine Arts, Science and Technology Ma2.1 mi195.0%19.9%+5.6pp10.7%
Cactus Medical, Health and Technology Magnet Acade1.5 mi165.4%18.8%+1.8pp14.9%
California average3816.8%39.3%+1.5pp3.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019101#19832.1%12.8%21.8%23.7%+4.0pp
2022124#20862.7%13.4%23.6%18.1%+3.5pp
2023102#21291.6%12.0%23.2%18.3%+2.9pp
20241911#19763.1%12.2%40.2%6.8%+1.3pp
20252422#17484.5%19.3%38.8%9.4%+2.6pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female22.4%42.3%+19.9pp
Male21.3%36.3%+15.0pp
Black/African American38.4%49.7%+11.3pp
Hispanic/Latino17.9%36.0%+18.1pp
Students with Disabilities30.7%39.7%+9.0pp
English Learners17.9%31.8%+13.9pp
Foster Youth16.1%39.1%+23.0pp
Homeless56.3%65.4%+9.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21.8%40.4%+18.6pp
All Students21.9%39.2%+17.3pp
Two or More Races52.4%
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+10643Accelerated−2642Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+9592Accelerated−1591Average
Hispanic or Latino+10487Accelerated−3486Average
English Only+6364not categorised−3364not categorised
English Learner+4216Average−5215Average
Students with Disabilities−1148Average+2147Average
English Learners Only−7124not categorised−6123not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)+1113Average−6112Moderate
Black or African American−2107Average−1107Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+1392not categorised−692not categorised
White+1522Accelerated+422Average
Two or More Races−1117Moderate−117Average
Homeless Youth−516Average−2116Minimal
Foster Youth+1714Accelerated+114Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/space-aeronautics-gateway-to-exploration-magnet-ac-5301"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Space Aeronautics Gateway to Exploration Magnet Ac — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction