ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Short Avenue Elementary · Los Angeles

Short Avenue Elementary: Two in five kids exceed the standard. But the zoned next school scores lower.

Short Avenue holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

12814 Maxella Avenue, 90066 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Los Angeles·Grades TK-5·414 students·29% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 397-4234·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6745
% Exceeded44%21%
% Met+71%43%
Growth-0.3-2.9
Absence11.0%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
67
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #614 statewide · #46 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Short Avenue Elementary scores 67 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.

Most rating sites would stop at “71% proficient” and call it done. Short Avenue deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Short Avenue's low-income kids hit 65.1% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 65th to the 89th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1300 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 71% of students meet the standard today, above the 53% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 364%52%58%67%70%
Grade 438%49%53%70%86%
Grade 570%69%58%53%75%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 364%52%67%51%60%
Grade 433%33%54%63%80%
Grade 550%43%33%35%55%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
44.5%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The next step · the zoned path
33pts

the zoned path continues to Marina del Rey Middle, which scores 33 points lower — worth asking about on a tour.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

44%
26%
30%
Grade 3 · 70% proficient
67%
20%
13%
Grade 4 · 87% proficient
33%
43%
24%
Grade 5 · 76% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 11.4pp across grades; the floor rises 4.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

65.1%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Short Avenue's most underrated number

65.1% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Short Avenue low-income: 65.1%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
44.5%
State 21.3%
23.1pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-0.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
71.2%
State 42.7%
28.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.0%
State 17.9%
6.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.5%
State 18.0%
5.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Short Avenue Elementary in Los Angeles, 65.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Short Avenue Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 24.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (50.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (65.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.2 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 63 students tested.

All students at this school: 71% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 71%, district —, state 43%71%
FemaleFemale: this school 66%, district 42%, state 44%66% · −6 vs school
MaleMale: this school 77%, district 41%, state 42%77% · +6 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 57%, district 36%, state 32%57% · −14 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 61%, district 36%, state 32%61% · −10 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 84%, district 65%, state 56%84% · +13 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 71%, district 56%, state 56%71% · +0 vs school

6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 16.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.0%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%11.0% · −6.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (13.3% vs 8.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.5%
TK/K13.3%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Marina del Rey Middle, which scores 33 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 20:122:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience6.9 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,126, CA average $14,815$21,126 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$677 per student

$677 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic33.8%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Other31.9%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
White29.5%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black2.9%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Asian1.9%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 28.7% (35pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$114K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.70M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+62% · CA 35%
ZIP population56,740
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 53% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Short Avenue Elementary a good school?

Yes, by the numbers this is a Strong school — a Scope Score putting it at the 89.31 percentile statewide, with 71.2% of students meeting or exceeding standard on CAASPP (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). But that school-wide number hides real unevenness. Grade 5 math sits at only 55.0% met or exceeded, far below grade 4 ELA's 86.3%, and Hispanic/Latino students score 13.4 points below the school average. A strong average can still leave specific grades and groups behind, so the verdict depends partly on which grade and which student you're asking about.

Does Short Avenue live up to what it says about itself?

Mostly, yes, with one real gap. The school describes an IB, inquiry-based program built around 'student agency and international mindedness,' and the CAASPP numbers back that up in aggregate — 71.2% met or exceeded, 44.5% exceeded standard, a Strong band overall. The school's 'Whole Child' motto also lines up with a calm daily record: 0.1% suspension and 11.0% chronic absenteeism. Where it gets more complicated is the mission's language about 'all students' learning 'together.' The Hispanic/Latino subgroup gap (13.4 points below average) and the English Learner Level 4 rate (23.5%) show the experience isn't the same for every student. Worth asking directly on a visit: how does the IB approach get adapted for English Learners and for the students behind the average, specifically?

Does this school work for kids like mine?

It depends on which group your child belongs to. Hispanic/Latino students here score 13.4 points below the school average on CAASPP, the largest subgroup gap on record for this school. This describes an outcome gap; it says nothing about the students' effort or ability. If your child is an English Learner, it's also worth knowing that 23.5% reach ELPAC Level 4. Neither number tells you why the gap exists — that's a fair thing to ask a teacher or principal about directly.

How do English Learners do at Short Avenue?

23.5% of English Learners reach ELPAC Level 4 in the most recent data. That's just under a quarter — worth asking what language support looks like for the other three-quarters, and how the school tracks progress toward Level 4 year over year.

Who is actually teaching at Short Avenue?

Teachers here average 6.9 years of experience, only 5.3% are in their first year, and 100% are fully credentialed. This describes staffing stability. It doesn't tell you anything about how any individual teacher performs in the classroom.

What does Short Avenue spend per student?

$21,126 per student, below the state average of $23,518. Spending below the state average reflects district allocation and doesn't by itself indicate under-resourcing. It also doesn't explain any specific test score here.

Are some grades stronger than others at Short Avenue?

Yes. Grade 4 ELA is the strongest tested grade-subject at 86.3% met or exceeded, while grade 5 math is the weakest at 55.0% (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). If your child is entering a specific grade, that gap matters more than the school-wide average. We can't tell from this record what's behind the grade 5 math dip — curriculum sequencing or something specific to that cohort — and that's a good question for a classroom visit.

What's daily life like at Short Avenue?

Attendance and behavior data point to a calm campus: suspension rate of 0.1% and chronic absenteeism of 11.0%. Those numbers can't tell you about classroom engagement or how kids feel about being there day to day, but they're a real, low-friction baseline to start from.

Where do Short Avenue students go after this school?

The school has 6 feeder schools on record. This is a count of destinations, with no quality data attached — worth looking up separately if middle school placement matters to your decision.

What we found when we looked closer

Short Avenue Elementary is a Strong school — a Scope Score at the 89.31 state percentile, driven by 71.2% of students meeting or exceeding standard on CAASPP (current-year data). That's a genuinely good number. It's also an average, and averages hide things. Grade 5 math sits at 55.0% met or exceeded, well behind grade 4 ELA's 86.3%. Hispanic/Latino students score 13.4 points below the school's own average, the largest subgroup gap on record here. Both facts are true at once: a school can post a strong aggregate percentile while one grade-subject combination and one subgroup pull the mean down underneath it.

The school describes itself as an IB campus built on inquiry, student agency, and international mindedness. The aggregate scores back that description up: 71.2% met or exceeded standard, and 44.5% exceeded it outright. What the data can't do is confirm the program is the reason the scores are strong. Staffing and community resources could be contributing too, and this record doesn't let you separate them.

The school also calls itself 'Focused on the Whole Child,' and the climate numbers are consistent with that: a 0.1% suspension rate and 11.0% chronic absenteeism describe a calm, low-disruption campus. But those numbers only speak to attendance and behavior. They say nothing about enrichment, belonging, or whether a given child feels seen in class.

Where the school's language gets harder to square with the record is its mission statement, which talks about 'all students' learning 'together.' The Hispanic/Latino subgroup gap and an English Learner Level-4 rate of 23.5% suggest the experience isn't uniform. These numbers measure an outcome gap. What's driving it is unclear from this record alone — it could be language support structure or instructional practice, and test data alone can't say which.

Staffing looks stable: teachers average 6.9 years of experience, just 5.3% are in their first year, and all are fully credentialed. Per-pupil spending, at $21,126, runs below the state average of $23,518, though that's a resourcing fact about the district, not a cause you can pin any specific score to.

For a family deciding whether to enroll a five-year-old here, the honest version is this: the school-wide numbers are strong enough to take seriously, and the climate data suggests a calm place to spend a school day. If your child is Hispanic/Latino, an English Learner, or will land in grade 5 for math, the school-wide average won't tell you what their actual experience looks like. That's worth asking about directly on a tour — specifically, what happens differently in grade 5 math, and what support looks like for the students currently below the average.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
44.5%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 72th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-0.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 56th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
71.2%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 72th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.0%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 61th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 58th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35744%26%21%9%70%+27
Grade 45167%20%8%6%86%+41
Grade 54033%43%20%5%75%+27
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35840%21%26%14%60%+15
Grade 45149%31%18%2%80%+39
Grade 54035%20%25%20%55%+20
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/114015%38%43%5%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6365.1%+24+27
Hispanic/Latino5865.5%+24+27
White5691.1%+22+29
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Short Avenue Elementary ←6744.5%71.2%−0.30.1%
Clover Avenue Elementary2.5 mi8165.6%86.3%−3.90.5%
Edison Elementary3 mi8050.4%81.3%−10.80.1%
Kentwood Elementary2.5 mi7763.2%80.7%−14.80.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194965#192327.8%53.0%22.4%0.3%-3.7pp
20224772#159424.0%49.5%29.4%0.1%+3.5pp
20234461#223427.4%53.8%29.8%0.1%-17.4pp
20245577#133333.5%56.4%15.2%0.2%-15.4pp
20256789#61444.5%71.2%11.0%0.1%-0.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female22.4%12.3%-10.1pp
Male23.1%8.1%-15.0pp
Asian0.0%
Black/African American26.8%7.7%-19.1pp
Hispanic/Latino26.6%13.9%-12.7pp
Two or More Races17.2%12.5%-4.7pp
Students with Disabilities28.3%19.5%-8.8pp
English Learners32.1%13.6%-18.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24.5%19.8%-4.7pp
All Students22.8%10.3%-12.5pp
Filipino7.1%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction