English
−28
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Minimal, the lowest of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Public school · Scott Valley Unified
237 Butte Street, Fort Jones · 153 students · Grades 6–8
Choose up to four middle schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Scott Valley Junior High’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Campus map · © OpenStreetMap
Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
Scope Score 68
75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built
Well below California in English, near it in math: 35% and 33% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8, spring 2026, against 49% and 37%.
Overview
Needs Support. Scott Valley Junior High is higher than most California middle schools on math test results. Scott Valley Junior High is lower than most on English test results, progress in both subjects and attendance.
Test results, spring 2026
Progress in a year, 2025
Showing up, 2025–26
33 in 100 students (48 of 146) missed 10% or more of school days in 2025–26. That compares with 18 in 100 at the average California middle school.
Each bar is Scott Valley Junior High’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.
A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.
In its own words
We haven’t read Scott Valley Junior High’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.
Progress
Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 28 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Minimal. In math, they scored 16 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
English
−28
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Minimal, the lowest of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Math
−16
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Grades 6–8, 2025, 125 students in English, 126 in math with scores in both years. Faded rows have fewer than 40 students. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.
The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 28 points below that expected score, and in math 16 points below it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.
SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 15th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across English and math, not matched students in California's separate growth model.
Schools like it
Scott Valley Junior High’s Scope Score is 68. 331 California middle schools, counting Scott Valley Junior High, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 74. Scott Valley Junior High’s result is higher than 35 of them.
The five schools with the highest results of the 331
Students from low-income families: 64%
Los Angeles
Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 71%
Fresno
Scope Score 94Strong · 98th percentile
Students from low-income families: 71%
Scope Score 91Strong · 96th percentile
Students from low-income families: 65%
San Jose
Scope Score 90Strong · 95th percentile
Students from low-income families: 61%
Fairfield
Scope Score 90Strong · 94th percentile
331 California public middle schools where 60% to 72% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.
The group is every California public middle school we score where 60% to 72% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Scott Valley Junior High’s share. The count includes Scott Valley Junior High. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.
Over time
English results were lower than in 2025; math results were higher. English went from 40% to 35% and math from 28% to 33%.
Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026
Grades 6–8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.
English
Math
The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now.
| Spring | Scott Valley Junior High | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 42% | 48% | 147 |
| 2018 | 37% | 49% | 136 |
| 2019 | 49% | 50% | 141 |
| 2022 | 47% | 47% | 152 |
| 2023 | 44% | 46% | 166 |
| 2024 | 41% | 46% | 156 |
| 2025 | 40% | 49% | 133 |
| 2026 | 35% | 49% | 140 |
| Spring | Scott Valley Junior High | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 44% | 37% | 147 |
| 2018 | 44% | 37% | 136 |
| 2019 | 43% | 38% | 141 |
| 2022 | 32% | 31% | 150 |
| 2023 | 28% | 32% | 165 |
| 2024 | 27% | 33% | 156 |
| 2025 | 28% | 36% | 134 |
| 2026 | 33% | 37% | 140 |
Tests
Well below California in English; near it in math.
English
35%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
3629278Math
33%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
45221914In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 35% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 33% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.
The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 35% | 31% | 38% |
| Advanced | 9% | 7% | 7% |
| Proficient | 26% | 24% | 31% |
| Developing level | 39% | 26% | 22% |
| Minimal | 26% | 43% | 40% |
| Tested | 43 | 42 | 55 |
| California | 48% | 51% | 49% |
| Difference | −13 | −20 | −11 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 47% | 33% | 22% |
| Advanced | 21% | 14% | 7% |
| Proficient | 26% | 19% | 15% |
| Developing level | 25% | 19% | 22% |
| Minimal | 28% | 48% | 56% |
| Tested | 43 | 42 | 55 |
| California | 37% | 38% | 36% |
| Difference | +10 | −5 | −14 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 6–8 · This school | 8% | 27% | 29% | 36% | 140 |
| English, grades 6–8 · California | 19% | 30% | 23% | 28% | 1,254,039 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · This school | 14% | 19% | 22% | 45% | 140 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · California | 21% | 16% | 23% | 40% | 1,254,800 |
Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined: 140 tested in English, 140 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Who goes here
White students are the largest group here, at 60% of students. 48 of 146 students missed 10% or more of school days.
Missing school, 2025–26
33in 100
students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (48 of 146 students).
At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.
No district average: Scott Valley Junior High is the only regular middle school we rank in the Scott Valley Unified district with an attendance record.
Students, 2024–25
153
students in grades 6–8.
Family income
66%
of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 101 of 153. California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
8
teachers, with 12 years of experience on average.
0% were in their first year.
91% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.
Suspensions, 2025–26
9.5%
of students were suspended at least once (14 of 148). Average California middle school 3.7%.
Sources: California Department of Education. Each tile names its year.
| Students | Here |
|---|---|
| White | 60% |
| Two or more races | 16% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 12% |
| Asian | — |
| Black or African American | — |
| Filipino | — |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.
Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 7.5 of 8.3 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.
Student groups
White and low-income students scored well below the same groups across California in English.
44% of White students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 6–8, spring 2026), against 62% for the same group across California. Low-income students: 25% in English, against 39% for the same group across California.
Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 6–8, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.
| Group and subject | Here | vs Scott Valley Unified | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 87 tested | |||
| English | 25% | 025% | −1439% |
| Math | 25% | 025% | −126% |
| White · 86 tested | |||
| English | 44% | 044% | −1862% |
| Math | 40% | 040% | −1050% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Scott Valley Unified, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
Students of two or more races: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Family and staff answers
Families can answer a short set of questions about Scott Valley Junior High. These are not star ratings or reviews.
Families
0 of 20 needed before answers show
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work
Staff
We don’t check staff emails for Scott Valley Unified yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.
Money
$15,980 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student. Scott Valley Unified’s plan for 2026–27 covers $2 million.
$15,980
for each student at this school, 2024–25The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓
$2million
in the district’s plan for 2026–27This is the district’s plan. It is not this school’s own budget. The plan has 4 goals. The district’s page lists each one. The plan covers $2 million of $13 million in total budgeted spending. Source: Scott Valley Unified Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), 2026–27. Read the district’s plan →
The neighborhood
These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 96032. They are not figures for the families at Scott Valley Junior High.
Typical household income in a year
$72,951
Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 96032.
What you can do
Scott Valley Unified’s board decides Scott Valley Junior High’s plan.
When the plan is set
Scott Valley Unified’s board must adopt its yearly plan (LCAP) by July 1, after at least one public hearing at an earlier meeting.
How to take part
State support
The state hasn’t placed Scott Valley Junior High in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
Questions to ask
Bring these 7 questions to Scott Valley Junior High. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.
Getting in
Ask Scott Valley Unified which school serves your address.
These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Explore schools on the map
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.
Where it is
A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map
Ask Scott Valley Unified which school serves your address. See the details ↓
Scott Valley Junior High has a Scope Score of 68. It scored higher than 10 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Needs Support, 10th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓
In 2025–26, 33 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 18 in 100 at the average California middle school. 9.5% of students (14 of 148) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓
Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 28 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Minimal. In math, they scored 16 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
In spring 2026, 25% of low-income students in grades 6–8 at Scott Valley Junior High in Fort Jones scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓
The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓
The full record
This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.
Data updated
October 15, 2026
Results
Students
Money and staff
Place, downloads and method
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 11% | 43 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 34% | 45 | 23% |
| 8th graders in 2026 against 6th graders in 2024 (partly different children) | +20 scale-score pts | 15 | 20% |
| Chronically absent | 33 in 100 | 32 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 9.5% (14 of 148) | 29 | 5% |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students. The weights above add to 95%: English learners reaching the top level of the state’s English test has no value for this school, so its 5% weight is shared out among the measures above.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 68 | 10 | #2270 | California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 14 in 100 | 18.1% (30 of 166) | −21 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | −1 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | +14 |
| 2023–24 | 21 in 100 | 18.3% (31 of 169) | −18 |
| 2024–25 | 23 in 100 | 7.7% (12 of 155) | +5 |
| 2025–26 | 33 in 100 | 9.5% (14 of 148) | −11 |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 140 | 8% | 35% |
| 2026 · Math | 140 | 14% | 33% |
| 2025 · English | 133 | 10% | 40% |
| 2025 · Math | 134 | 10% | 28% |
| 2024 · English | 156 | 13% | 41% |
| 2024 · Math | 156 | 10% | 27% |
| 2023 · English | 166 | 8% | 44% |
| 2023 · Math | 165 | 10% | 28% |
| 2022 · English | 152 | 14% | 47% |
| 2022 · Math | 150 | 16% | 32% |
| 2019 · English | 141 | 13% | 49% |
| 2019 · Math | 141 | 17% | 43% |
| 2018 · English | 136 | 10% | 37% |
| 2018 · Math | 136 | 23% | 44% |
| 2017 · English | 147 | 7% | 42% |
| 2017 · Math | 147 | 20% | 44% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 6 · English | 37 | 35% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · English | 53 | 40% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · English | 43 | 44% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · Math | 37 | 35% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · Math | 53 | 17% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · Math | 44 | 36% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · English | 55 | 45% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · English | 50 | 40% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · English | 51 | 37% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 55 | 42% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 50 | 24% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 51 | 14% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · English | 57 | 44% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · English | 52 | 35% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · English | 57 | 53% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 57 | 18% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 51 | 29% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 57 | 37% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · English | 47 | 38% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · English | 56 | 57% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · English | 49 | 45% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 45 | 33% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 56 | 38% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 49 | 24% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · English | 47 | 62% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · English | 42 | 57% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · English | 52 | 31% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 47 | 45% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 42 | 52% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 52 | 33% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · English | 43 | 42% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · English | 51 | 37% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · English | 42 | 31% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · Math | 43 | 56% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · Math | 51 | 41% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · Math | 42 | 36% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · English | 60 | 33% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · English | 41 | 39% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · English | 46 | 57% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · Math | 60 | 37% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · Math | 41 | 46% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · Math | 46 | 50% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 55 | 2% | 20% | 49% | 29% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 87 | 25% | 0 | −14 |
| White | 86 | 44% | 0 | −18 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | −28 | 125 | Minimal | −16 | 126 | Moderate |
| English-only students | −29 | 123 | not categorized | −16 | 124 | not categorized |
| Low-income | −31 | 83 | Minimal | −19 | 83 | Moderate |
| White | −21 | 72 | Minimal | −13 | 73 | Moderate |
| Two or more races | −21 | 23 | Minimal | −7 | 23 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | −21 | 13 | Minimal | −25 | 13 | Minimal |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 55 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
State model · English−28 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 6–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 6–8
125 students
CDE growth category: Minimal
State model · math−16 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 6–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 6–8
126 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.
CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 23 in 100 → 2025–26 · 33 in 100 · +10 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 7.7% (12 of 155) → 2025–26 · 9.5% (14 of 148) · +1.8 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10 of 79 | 27 of 78 | — |
| Male | 13 of 82 | 21 of 68 | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | 4 of 18 | 7 of 17 | — |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 7 of 29 | — | — |
| Two or more races | 1 of 15 | 10 of 23 | — |
| White | 11 of 93 | 23 of 87 | — |
| Students with disabilities | 9 of 23 | 6 of 17 | — |
| Low-income | 20 in 100 | 32 of 90 | — |
| All students | 14 in 100 | 33 in 100 | +19 in 100 |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 612 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 153
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 153
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $5,930,700 | 50.67% | 51% |
| Instruction support | $1,475,924 | 12.61% | 12% |
| Student services | $900,158 | 7.69% | 8% |
| Administration | $1,160,552 | 9.91% | 10% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $1,731,080 | 14.79% | 15% |
| Other | $507,082 | 4.33% | 4% |
| Total | $11,705,497 | 100.00% | 100% |
These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $11,705,497 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $72,951 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 23% |
| ZIP-area population | 2,408 |
| Median age | 47.5 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 96032 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.