ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Samuel Vaughn Elementary · Ceres

Samuel Vaughn Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Samuel Vaughn posts 36% meeting the standard and 14.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

3618 Helen Perry Road, 95307 (opens in new tab)·Ceres Unified·Ceres·Grades TK-6·570 students·79% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 556-1690
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded14%21%
% Met+36%43%
Growth+10.8-2.9
Absence11.7%17.9%
Suspension1.2%1.6%
Scope Score
47
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #2,192 statewide · #3 of 15 in Ceres Unified

Samuel Vaughn Elementary scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 62nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Samuel Vaughn deserves a closer read. The school sits in Ceres, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 19th to the 62nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2300 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 36% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 343%34%30%31%31%
Grade 433%24%34%38%38%
Grade 536%25%28%31%54%
Grade 649%36%29%23%26%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 350%37%39%30%36%
Grade 428%21%19%30%20%
Grade 515%8%16%18%35%
Grade 632%23%14%18%16%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

11%
20%
69%
Grade 3 · 31% proficient
18%
20%
62%
Grade 4 · 38% proficient
14%
39%
47%
Grade 5 · 53% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.3pp across grades; the floor rises 22.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.5%
State 21.3%
6.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+10.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
35.6%
State 42.7%
7.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.7%
State 17.9%
6.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.2%
State 1.6%
0.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
12.2%
State 18.0%
5.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Samuel Vaughn Elementary in Ceres, 36.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Samuel Vaughn Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 249 students tested.

All students at this school: 31% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 31%, district —, state 43%31%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 31%, district 29%, state 32%31% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 29%, state 32%29% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 32%, district 31%, state 42%32% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 31%, district 32%, state 44%31% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 11%, state 11%10% · −21 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 47%, district 44%, state 72%47% · +16 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 11%, district 12%, state 15%11% · −20 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 25%, district 39%, state 56%25% · −6 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 23.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.7%, district 18.2%, state 17.9%11.7% · −6.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 1.6%1.2% · −0.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (19.3% vs 8.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.0%
TK/K19.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 24:124:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience13.8 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers4%
Intern / emergency permit4.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,779 – $139,451
Principal salary$159,081 – $177,439
Superintendent salary$309,149

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,553, CA average $14,815$20,553 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,167 per student

$2,167 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,592 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support16%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,347 per pupil
2019$12,588 per pupil
2018$12,822 per pupil
2017$11,492 per pupil
2016$11,268 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic73.2%
District 81.0% · CA 56.1%
Asian12.6%
District 5.7% · CA 10.2%
White10.9%
District 9.7% · CA 19.9%
Other2.5%
District 2.4% · CA 9.0%
Black0.9%
District 1.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 79.3% (16pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$430K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+13% · CA 35%
ZIP population46,310
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Samuel Vaughn Elementary a good elementary school?

Samuel Vaughn Elementary has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 62nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,192 statewide. 14.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Samuel Vaughn Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.6% of students at Samuel Vaughn Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 433 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Samuel Vaughn Elementary rank in California?

Samuel Vaughn Elementary ranks #2,192 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 62nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Samuel Vaughn Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Samuel Vaughn Elementary increases by 10.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Samuel Vaughn Elementary?

11.7% of students at Samuel Vaughn Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Samuel Vaughn Elementary compare to other schools in Ceres?

Samuel Vaughn Elementary scores 47/100 (62nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 570 students. Use the schools in Ceres page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Samuel Vaughn Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Samuel Vaughn Elementary in Ceres, 36.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Samuel Vaughn Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 249 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 43th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+10.8pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 68th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
35.6%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 60th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 53th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
12.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 43th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36511%20%22%48%31%−13
Grade 48018%20%21%41%38%−7
Grade 57114%39%17%30%54%+6
Grade 6924%22%32%42%26%−20
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36612%24%26%38%36%−9
Grade 48011%9%46%34%20%−22
Grade 57121%14%39%25%35%−0
Grade 6924%12%25%59%16%−19
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11706%17%64%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24936.5%−0−2
Hispanic/Latino22534.7%−3−4
English Learners929.8%−1−1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Samuel Vaughn Elementary ←4714.5%35.6%+10.81.2%
La Rosa Elementary0.6 mi5422.6%51.5%−17.00.6%
Patricia Kay Beaver Elementary2.8 mi4712.9%35.6%−23.81.5%
M. Robert Adkison Elementary2 mi4112.4%37.5%−5.60.5%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193119#446812.1%34.1%5.6%1.3%-20.8pp
20222416#47987.3%25.0%23.0%1.8%-19.1pp
20233128#40917.7%27.8%16.4%2.0%-12.5pp
20243326#426411.3%29.7%10.0%1.6%-5.5pp
20254762#219214.5%35.6%11.7%1.2%+10.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.0%10.0%+6.0pp
Male7.0%12.4%+5.4pp
Asian2.3%3.9%+1.6pp
Black/African American0.0%
Hispanic/Latino6.7%12.6%+5.9pp
Students with Disabilities7.8%19.8%+12.0pp
English Learners3.4%6.9%+3.5pp
Military-Connected0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.7%12.4%+6.7pp
All Students5.5%11.3%+5.8pp
Pacific Islander0.0%
Homeless33.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction