ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
🏫
Solid Base

A solid, reliable choice — most students meet proficiency standards consistently.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
814 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
20:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
13%
Teachers
40 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Increased
+12.3 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Increased
+10.1 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
35.7%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 14 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic15.0%
White56.0%
Asian16.3%
Black0.9%
Other11.8%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Rolling Hills Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard43.6%
Met Standard31.3%
Below Standard25.1%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "75% proficient" for Rolling Hills Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

43.6% of students exceeded standard while 31.3% met it. That exceeded rate is 26.3 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's near the Buckeye Union Elementary district average of 42.7%. Compared to the 1 nearby schools within ~3 miles, this exceeded rate is 18.3 points higher (vs 25.3% average). The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Proficiency drops by 2.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth — a signal that the school may not be sustaining early gains.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased and Math increased year-over-year. 35.7% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 7.5%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
43.6%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
74.9%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
-2.7pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
7.5%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
2.0%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
1,488
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th23343.8%35.2%14.6%6.4%79.0%
7th23041.3%36.1%13.0%9.6%77.4%
8th28036.1%41.8%15.0%7.1%77.9%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th23450.4%23.9%19.7%6.0%74.4%
7th23144.6%26.4%17.8%11.3%71.0%
8th28045.4%24.6%18.9%11.1%70.0%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog