Placer Elementary: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.
Placer pairs 75% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 74 | 41% | 75% | +6.5 | 5.9% | 1.2% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Placer Elementary scores 74 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 94th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “75% proficient” and call it done. Placer deserves a closer read. It sits at the 94th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: +6.5pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 94th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 75% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 63% | 62% | 63% | 77% | 68% |
| Grade 4 | 69% | 60% | 68% | 67% | 79% |
| Grade 5 | 85% | 71% | 74% | 78% | 76% |
| Grade 6 | 69% | 63% | 74% | 72% | 73% |
| Grade 7 | 77% | 75% | 79% | 77% | 80% |
| Grade 8 | 88% | 84% | 86% | 84% | 68% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 70% | 62% | 71% | 81% | 72% |
| Grade 4 | 80% | 75% | 72% | 75% | 77% |
| Grade 5 | 79% | 69% | 73% | 72% | 76% |
| Grade 6 | 63% | 59% | 62% | 70% | 56% |
| Grade 7 | 69% | 59% | 59% | 58% | 68% |
| Grade 8 | 87% | 70% | 66% | 71% | 66% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 20.7pp across grades; the floor rises 8.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Placer Elementary in Loomis, 72.9% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 71.2% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Placer Elementary outperforms its district average for white students by 1.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (70.0% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 269 students tested.
8 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$442 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 62% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Placer Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Placer Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Placer Elementary rank in California?
Is Placer Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Placer Elementary?
How does Placer Elementary compare to other schools in Loomis?
How does Placer Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 62
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53 | 30% | 38% | 17% | 15% | 68% | +25 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 43% | 36% | 16% | 5% | 79% | +34 |
| Grade 5 | 55 | 51% | 25% | 16% | 7% | 76% | +28 |
| Grade 6 | 48 | 38% | 35% | 23% | 4% | 73% | +26 |
| Grade 7 | 59 | 46% | 34% | 10% | 10% | 80% | +32 |
| Grade 8 | 59 | 32% | 36% | 22% | 10% | 68% | +22 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53 | 32% | 40% | 21% | 8% | 72% | +26 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 45% | 32% | 21% | 2% | 77% | +35 |
| Grade 5 | 55 | 47% | 29% | 16% | 7% | 76% | +41 |
| Grade 6 | 48 | 40% | 17% | 25% | 19% | 56% | +21 |
| Grade 7 | 60 | 55% | 13% | 17% | 15% | 68% | +34 |
| Grade 8 | 59 | 39% | 27% | 19% | 15% | 66% | +34 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 113 | 27% | 35% | 37% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 269 | 72.9% | +2 | +11 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placer Elementary ← | — | 74 | 41.3% | 74.6% | +6.5 | 1.2% |
| Loomis Basin Charter | 2 mi | 71 | 45.4% | 75.2% | +7.3 | 1.1% |
| Franklin Elementary | 2.1 mi | 54 | 35.0% | 64.4% | −10.7 | 1.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 74 | 94 | #356 | 42.3% | 74.3% | 3.6% | 1.9% | +15.2pp |
| 2022 | 62 | 89 | #628 | 38.2% | 66.5% | 13.8% | 0.7% | +8.8pp |
| 2023 | 72 | 94 | #370 | 41.6% | 70.0% | 5.5% | 1.3% | +6.4pp |
| 2024 | 73 | 94 | #354 | 45.8% | 74.9% | 6.5% | 1.1% | -3.8pp |
| 2025 | 74 | 94 | #344 | 41.3% | 74.6% | 5.9% | 1.2% | +6.5pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2.1% | 3.6% | +1.5pp |
| Male | 4.7% | 6.0% | +1.3pp |
| Asian | 8.3% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.2% | 8.7% | +0.5pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 9.3% | 11.9% | +2.6pp |
| English Learners | 22.2% | 15.4% | -6.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 11.0% | 11.6% | +0.6pp |
| All Students | 3.5% | 4.8% | +1.3pp |
| Two or More Races | — | 0.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction