Loomis Basin Charter: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.
Loomis Basin Charter pairs 75% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 71 | 45% | 75% | +7.3 | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Loomis Basin Charter scores 71 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 92nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “75% proficient” and call it done. Loomis Basin Charter deserves a closer read. It sits at the 92nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: 45.4% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.
As a charter, Loomis Basin Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 92nd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 75% of students meet the standard today, above the 71% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 77% | 65% | 78% | 71% | 73% |
| Grade 4 | 69% | 58% | 75% | 76% | 77% |
| Grade 5 | 73% | 56% | 67% | 80% | 84% |
| Grade 6 | 77% | 58% | 62% | 73% | 90% |
| Grade 7 | 83% | 73% | 76% | 76% | 80% |
| Grade 8 | 88% | 83% | 71% | 78% | 77% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68% | 76% | 75% | 65% | 69% |
| Grade 4 | 65% | 52% | 78% | 83% | 75% |
| Grade 5 | 73% | 51% | 52% | 67% | 72% |
| Grade 6 | 67% | 53% | 55% | 55% | 76% |
| Grade 7 | 79% | 58% | 68% | 67% | 63% |
| Grade 8 | 79% | 75% | 68% | 75% | 68% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 18.4pp across grades; the floor rises 11.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Loomis Basin Charter in Loomis, 80.8% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 71.2% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Loomis Basin Charter outperforms its district average for white students by 9.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (69.1% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 234 students tested.
7 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
What gets spent here
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 64% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Loomis Basin Charter a good elementary school?
What are Loomis Basin Charter's CAASPP test scores?
How does Loomis Basin Charter rank in California?
Is Loomis Basin Charter getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Loomis Basin Charter?
How does Loomis Basin Charter compare to other schools in Loomis?
How does Loomis Basin Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 62
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 38% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 73% | +30 |
| Grade 4 | 60 | 48% | 28% | 12% | 12% | 77% | +32 |
| Grade 5 | 58 | 57% | 28% | 5% | 10% | 84% | +37 |
| Grade 6 | 60 | 45% | 45% | 3% | 7% | 90% | +43 |
| Grade 7 | 59 | 53% | 27% | 12% | 8% | 80% | +32 |
| Grade 8 | 60 | 40% | 37% | 20% | 3% | 77% | +31 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 40% | 29% | 23% | 8% | 69% | +24 |
| Grade 4 | 60 | 43% | 32% | 20% | 5% | 75% | +33 |
| Grade 5 | 58 | 45% | 28% | 16% | 12% | 72% | +37 |
| Grade 6 | 59 | 49% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 76% | +41 |
| Grade 7 | 59 | 37% | 25% | 25% | 12% | 63% | +29 |
| Grade 8 | 60 | 48% | 20% | 18% | 13% | 68% | +36 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 118 | 31% | 34% | 35% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 234 | 80.8% | +10 | +19 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loomis Basin Charter ← | — | 71 | 45.4% | 75.2% | +7.3 | 1.1% |
| Placer Elementary | 2 mi | 74 | 41.3% | 74.6% | +6.5 | 1.2% |
| Loomis Elementary | 2.7 mi | 59 | 34.8% | 62.2% | −31.5 | 0.5% |
| Franklin Elementary | 0.1 mi | 54 | 35.0% | 64.4% | −10.7 | 1.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 66 | 87 | #720 | 42.0% | 70.9% | 4.9% | 1.1% | -0.2pp |
| 2022 | 47 | 73 | #1574 | 29.7% | 59.7% | 8.6% | 1.0% | -16.8pp |
| 2023 | 54 | 78 | #1280 | 37.1% | 70.7% | 9.6% | 0.6% | -17.0pp |
| 2024 | 72 | 93 | #396 | 43.8% | 73.8% | 8.8% | 1.6% | +5.1pp |
| 2025 | 71 | 92 | #460 | 45.4% | 75.2% | 1.5% | 1.1% | +7.3pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.6% | 0.0% | -4.6pp |
| Male | 5.0% | 0.0% | -5.0pp |
| Asian | 3.4% | 0.0% | -3.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.3% | 0.0% | -8.3pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 10.8% | 0.0% | -10.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 7.4% | 0.0% | -7.4pp |
| All Students | 4.8% | 0.0% | -4.8pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction