ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Philip Magruder Middle · Torrance

Philip Magruder Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Philip Magruder posts 49% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

4100 West 185th Street, 90504 (opens in new tab)·Torrance Unified·Torrance·Grades 6-8·635 students·51% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 533-4527
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5143
% Exceeded24%17%
% Met+49%39%
Growth-1.2+1.5
Absence13.6%18.5%
Suspension2.2%3.7%
Scope Score
51
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #609 statewide · #7 of 8 in Torrance Unified

Philip Magruder Middle scores 51 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 73rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “49% proficient” and call it done. Philip Magruder deserves a closer read. The school sits in Torrance, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 34.9% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 73rd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Maintained)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 49% meet the standard today, versus 57% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 663%58%51%50%54%
Grade 762%61%61%50%50%
Grade 865%48%57%54%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 648%44%36%37%47%
Grade 749%37%41%39%43%
Grade 855%42%48%50%43%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

26%
29%
45%
Grade 6 · 55% proficient
19%
32%
49%
Grade 7 · 51% proficient
19%
36%
45%
Grade 8 · 55% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.4pp across grades; the floor rises 1.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
23.9%
State 16.8%
7.1pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-1.2pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
49.0%
State 39.3%
9.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.6%
State 18.5%
4.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.2%
State 3.7%
1.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
34.9%
State 18.0%
17.0pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Philip Magruder Middle in Torrance, 48.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Philip Magruder Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 7.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (42.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 353 students tested.

All students at this school: 49% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 49%, district —, state 39%49%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 42%, district 51%, state 32%42% · −7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 48%, district 65%, state 42%48% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 38%, district 49%, state 32%38% · −11 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 49%, district 65%, state 44%49% · +1 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 73%, district 82%, state 72%73% · +24 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 12%, district 31%, state 11%12% · −37 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 58%, district 66%, state 56%58% · +9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 16%, district 32%, state 15%16% · −33 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 68%, district 74%, state 56%68% · +19 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 29%, district 43%, state 26%29% · −20 vs school

6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -1.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.6%, district 11.1%, state 18.5%13.6% · −4.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.2%, district —, state 3.7%2.2% · −1.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.7%
Grades 7–813.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 28:1, district 26:128:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience17.4 years
Fully credentialed88%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,009 – $122,300
Principal salary$154,486 – $196,119
Superintendent salary$335,280

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,985, CA average $14,815$16,985 · spent at this school
Federal share$294 per student

$294 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,002 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,441 per pupil
2019$11,279 per pupil
2018$11,194 per pupil
2017$10,632 per pupil
2016$10,442 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic51.2%
District 34.7% · CA 56.1%
Asian17.3%
District 27.0% · CA 10.2%
White12.1%
District 18.5% · CA 19.9%
Other12.1%
District 15.7% · CA 9.0%
Black7.2%
District 4.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 50.9% (13pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$108K · CA $85K
Median home value$924K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+45% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,084
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 41% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Philip Magruder Middle a good middle school?

Philip Magruder Middle has a Scope Score of 51 out of 100, placing it in the 73rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #609 statewide. 23.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.1 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Philip Magruder Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 49.0% of students at Philip Magruder Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 23.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 23.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,246 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Philip Magruder Middle rank in California?

Philip Magruder Middle ranks #609 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 73rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Philip Magruder Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Philip Magruder Middle decreases by 1.2 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Philip Magruder Middle?

13.6% of students at Philip Magruder Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Philip Magruder Middle compare to other schools in Torrance?

Philip Magruder Middle scores 51/100 (73rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 635 students. Use the schools in Torrance page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Philip Magruder Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Philip Magruder Middle in Torrance, 48.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Philip Magruder Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 7.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (42.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 353 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
23.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 58th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-1.2pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
49.0%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 58th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.6%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.2%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 56th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
34.9%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 69th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 620026%29%17%29%54%+7
Grade 721219%32%28%21%50%+3
Grade 820919%36%29%16%56%+9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 620128%19%20%33%47%+12
Grade 721225%19%24%33%43%+9
Grade 821227%16%26%31%43%+11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1121217%24%51%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged35348.2%−7+10
Hispanic/Latino32042.5%−12+4
Asian10877.8%−4+3
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Philip Magruder Middle ←5123.9%49.0%−1.22.2%
Manhattan Beach Middle2.8 mi7248.3%77.3%−1.42.1%
Jefferson Middle2.2 mi6739.6%68.2%−1.12.4%
Bert M. Lynn Middle1.3 mi6641.6%71.2%−8.41.5%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194871#59023.2%57.0%5.9%9.7%+4.5pp
20224467#71320.3%48.4%18.7%5.7%-6.3pp
20235578#48121.1%49.1%15.8%8.0%+9.5pp
20244770#66221.4%46.6%17.4%2.5%+8.8pp
20255173#60923.9%49.0%13.6%2.2%-1.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female2.8%10.8%+8.0pp
Male8.4%15.9%+7.5pp
Asian1.0%7.1%+6.1pp
Black/African American8.3%10.6%+2.3pp
White0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino6.9%15.1%+8.2pp
Two or More Races9.4%22.5%+13.1pp
Students with Disabilities10.2%15.5%+5.3pp
English Learners2.5%23.6%+21.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.2%17.3%+12.1pp
All Students5.8%13.5%+7.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction