Independent charter school · Maricopa Unified

Peak to Peak Mountain Charter — Rating & test scores

19009 Cerro Noroeste Road, Pine Mountain Club · 54 students · Grades TK–8

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, inside the campus outline from the California School Campus Database (2025). Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 74

DevelopingScope Score · 44th percentile. Higher than 44 in 100 of the 5,726 California public elementary schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Near California in English and math: 36% and 41% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 3 and 4, spring 2026, against 45% and 45%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3 and 4: 22
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 3 and 4 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 798,645 in English and 800,621 in math tested).

Overview

Is Peak to Peak Mountain Charter a good elementary school?

Developing. Peak to Peak Mountain Charter is higher than most California elementary schools on math test results and attendance. Peak to Peak Mountain Charter is lower than most on English test results.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced3636%
Math, Proficient or Advanced5641%
English, Advanced4718%
Math, Advanced299%

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance755 in 100
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s place among California elementary schools, out of 100Maricopa Unified’s other elementary schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

Only 22 students were tested here in grades 3 and 4 in spring 2026, so one student’s result moves each rate by about 5 points.

Each bar is Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s place among 5,726 California public elementary schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 3–5. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Source for the sentence
CDE CAASPP research file (school rows), spring 2026 (students tested (points per student: 100 ÷ students tested, our arithmetic)).

In its own words

What does Peak to Peak Mountain Charter say about itself?

We haven’t read Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.

Open peaktopeakmountaincharter.org (opens in a new tab)

Schools like it

How does Peak to Peak Mountain Charter compare with schools like it?

Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s Scope Score is 74. 521 California elementary schools, counting Peak to Peak Mountain Charter, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 84. Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s result is higher than 17 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 521

  1. Students from low-income families: 24%

    Scope Score 99Strong · 99th percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 23%

    Scope Score 99Strong · 99th percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 27%

    Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 20%

    Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 28%

    Scope Score 97Strong · 99th percentile

521 California public elementary schools where 20% to 32% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public elementary school we score where 20% to 32% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s share. The count includes Peak to Peak Mountain Charter. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

Each line shows the share of students who scored Proficient or Advanced each spring.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grades 3 and 4. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017202630%69%45%CaliforniaCalifornia37%Maricopa UnifiedDistrict36%Peak to Peak Mountain CharterThis school

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017202622%58%45%CaliforniaCalifornia41%Peak to Peak Mountain CharterThis school30%Maricopa UnifiedDistrict

The hatched block marks years with no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Between 22 and 26 students were tested here each year in each subject. With 22 students, one student is 5 points, so each year is a dot and no line joins them. Maricopa Unified’s line combines its 5 elementary schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Maricopa Unified’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 3 and 4: share at the top two levels
SpringPeak to Peak Mountain CharterMaricopa UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
201769%30%44%26
202636%37%45%22
Math, grades 3 and 4: share at the top two levels
SpringPeak to Peak Mountain CharterMaricopa UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
201758%22%44%26
202641%30%45%22

A year is missing where fewer than the state’s minimum number of students tested and the state withheld the result.

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

36% of the 22 students tested scored Proficient or Advanced in English (reading and writing); 41% did in math.

English

36%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

36281818
Maricopa Unified37%California45%

Math

41%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

3623329
Maricopa Unified30%California45%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 3 and 4, spring 2026, 36% of the 22 students tested scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 45% across California. In math, 41% did, against 45% across California. Fewer than 30 students tested, so one year’s result can change a lot. Ask how results looked in other years.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 3 and 4 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced27%45%suppressed
Advanced9%27%suppressed
Proficient18%18%suppressed
Developing level28%28%suppressed
Minimal45%27%suppressed
Tested11116
California44%46%49%
Difference−17−1—
English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advancedsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Advancedsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Proficientsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Developing levelsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Minimalsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Tested66not on file
California48%51%49%
Difference———

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced36%45%suppressed
Advanced0%18%suppressed
Proficient36%27%suppressed
Developing level28%19%suppressed
Minimal36%36%suppressed
Tested11116
California47%42%37%
Difference−11+3—
Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advancedsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Advancedsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Proficientsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Developing levelsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Minimalsuppressedsuppressednot on file
Tested66not on file
California37%38%36%
Difference———

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 3 and 4 · This school18%18%28%36%22
English, grades 3 and 4 · California24%21%21%34%798,645
English, grades 3 and 4 · Maricopa Unified17%20%24%39%2,754
Math, grades 3 and 4 · This school9%32%23%36%22
Math, grades 3 and 4 · California21%24%25%30%800,621
Math, grades 3 and 4 · Maricopa Unified12%18%25%45%2,756

Spring 2026, grades 3 and 4 combined: 22 tested in English, 22 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

White students are the largest group here, at 43% of students. 4 of 86 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

4of 86

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days. That is 5 in 100.

At the average Maricopa Unified elementary school: 11 in 100. At the average California elementary school: 17 in 100.

Students, 2024–25

54

students in grades TK–8.

White 43%Hispanic or Latino 38%

Family income

26%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 14 of 54. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

4

teachers, with 2 years of experience on average.

75% were in their first year.

50% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

Suspensions, 2025–26

1.1%

of students were suspended at least once (1 of 91). Average California elementary school 1.6%.

Sources: California Department of Education. Each tile names its year.

Missing school, by grade
Grades 4–6
2 of 24 students in grades 4–6 were chronically absent.
Grades 7–8
0 of 12 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent.

Our records hold no figure for Grades TK–3.

Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
White43%
Hispanic or Latino38%
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 2 of 4 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Family and staff answers

What would families tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Peak to Peak Mountain Charter. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

The school day

What is the school day like?

Peak to Peak Mountain Charter has transitional kindergarten (TK). Our records do not hold school hours or before- and after-school care yet. Ask the office.

Transitional kindergarten (TK), 2025–26

8

TK students in 2025–26.

TK is California’s free public program for four-year-olds.

TK count: California Department of Education, Census Day enrollment, 2025–26. Find TK schools near you

The neighborhood

What is the area around Peak to Peak Mountain Charter like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 93222. They are not figures for the families at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter.

Typical household income in a year

$69,337

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 93222.

Typical home value
$393,000
People who live in this ZIP code
2,721
Typical age
48.6 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
43%

What you can do

Who can act on Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s results?

Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s own board decides its plan.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Peak to Peak Mountain Charter in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Reading screening in kindergarten through grade 2

California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.

Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.

If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.

Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.

California Education Code § 53008. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 5 questions to Peak to Peak Mountain Charter. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?64% in English and 59% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grades 3 and 4, spring 2026 (22 students tested in each); California: 55% and 55%

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

How do I get in?

Ask Peak to Peak Mountain Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

Where it is

Where is Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?

Address
19009 Cerro Noroeste Road, Pine Mountain Club 93222Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Lori KallAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated October 31, 2025.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 5 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Peak to Peak Mountain Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Peak to Peak Mountain Charter a good elementary school?

Peak to Peak Mountain Charter has a Scope Score of 74. It scored higher than 44 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools (Developing, 44th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 4 of 86 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 11 in 100 at the average Maricopa Unified elementary school. 1.1% of students (1 of 91) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $54,000 is planned for 5 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s 4% of its $1.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does Peak to Peak Mountain Charter’s own plan commit to?

$54,000 is planned for 5 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s 4% of its $1.2 million general fund budget.

$54,000

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation$38,000
  • Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics$7,500
  • Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism$5,000

These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 97 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 97 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 94% of the money. The plan itself puts 0% of it toward staff.

  • Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation $38,000
  • Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics $7,500
  • Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism $5,000
  • 2 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

3 of the plan’s 5 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

  • Math $10,000
  • Catch-up help $38,000

Largest of these

  • Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation$38,000
  • Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics$7,500
  • Professional development around Rigor/​Student Engagement to increase Mathematics annual CAASPP scores$2,500
For high-need students

It plans $54,000 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $34,500 and estimates it spent $47,613, $13,113 (38%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $19,500 (57%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation, which went from $24,000 to $38,000.

Largest increases

  • Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation+⁠$14,000
  • Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics+⁠$5,500

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism$5,000
  • Fully Implement the Charter attendance policy to reduce Chronic Absenteeism$1,000
What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 3 and 4 only: 36% in English and 41% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 165%47%down 18 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 165%42%down 23 pts
Chronically absentGoal 28 in 1005 in 1003 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 20 of 631.1%up 1.1 pts

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation · $38,000
  • Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics · $7,500
  • Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism · $5,000
The full plan2 goals, 19 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($54,000).

Where does the money go?

89% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1By 2027, Peak to Peak Mountain Charter (P2P) will increase the percentage of students performing at the…$48,00089% of action budgets

“By 2027, Peak to Peak Mountain Charter (P2P) will increase the percentage of students performing at the Proficient and Advanced levels in Mathematics as measured by local benchmark assessments (STAR 360 Math and i-Ready Diagnostics) and CAASPP state assessment data. This will be achieved through the full implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in mathematics and the intentional delivery of instruction at Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels 3 and 4 to elevate rigor, engagement, and student problem-solving skills” p. 18 ↗

3 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation$38,000action 1.2 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics$7,500action 1.3 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Professional development around Rigor/​Student Engagement to increase Mathematics annual CAASPP scores$2,500action 1.1 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Action 1.2 RTI program and lower teacher-student ratio Implementation+⁠$14,000$24,000 → $38,000 · p. 61 ↗
  2. Action 1.3 Instructional Materials for Mathematics+⁠$5,500$2,000 → $7,500 · p. 61 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Professional development around Rigor/​Student Engagement to increase Mathematics annual CAASPP scores · $2,500 → $2,500 · p. 61 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 10 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 18 ↗.

Goal 2 · Focus GoalBy 2028, P2P will strengthen and sustain a comprehensive Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) that promotes…$6,00011% of action budgets

“By 2028, P2P will strengthen and sustain a comprehensive Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) that promotes student attendance, engagement, wellness, and connectedness in order to maintain school attendance above 90% ADA while reducing chronic absenteeism and increasing positive student participation in schoolwide learning experiences. Through integrated academic, behavioral, social-emotional, and family support systems, the Charter will continue fostering a safe, inclusive, and supportive whole-child learning environment for all students. (State LCFF Priority Areas/​Goals 3/​5/​6)” p. 45 ↗

2 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism$5,000action 2.2 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Fully Implement the Charter attendance policy to reduce Chronic Absenteeism$1,000action 2.1 · p. 61 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Incentive MTSS Programs to raise attendance rates to reduce chronic absenteeism · $5,000 · p. 61 ↗new or renamed
  • Fully Implement the Charter attendance policy to reduce Chronic Absenteeism · $1,000 · p. 61 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 45 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 8 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
8
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census Bureau
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #3,160 of 5,726 California elementary schools we score · #2 of 5 in Maricopa Unified
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math14%4342%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math39%4723%
Chronically absent4 of 86625%
Suspension rate1.1% (1 of 91)535%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 75%: the remaining 25%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–267444#3160California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula

2018–19 has records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for it.

School yearChronic absenceSuspension
2018–19not on filenot on file
2025–264 of 861.1% (1 of 91)

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English4314%47%
2026 · Math4312%42%
2025 · English2025%65%
2025 · Math2025%65%
2024 · English1811%61%
2024 · Math1817%50%
2023 · English3321%48%
2023 · Math329%50%
2022 · English3330%70%
2022 · Math3315%48%
2019 · English5920%44%
2019 · Math597%34%
2018 · English3832%74%
2018 · Math3818%47%
2017 · English5826%72%
2017 · Math589%53%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 3 · English7—
2025 · Grade 4 · English——
2025 · Grade 5 · English5—
2025 · Grade 6 · English4—
2025 · Grade 7 · English——
2025 · Grade 8 · English——
2025 · Grade 3 · Math7—
2025 · Grade 4 · Math——
2025 · Grade 5 · Math5—
2025 · Grade 6 · Math4—
2025 · Grade 7 · Math——
2025 · Grade 8 · Math——
2024 · Grade 3 · English——
2024 · Grade 4 · English——
2024 · Grade 5 · English——
2024 · Grade 6 · English5—
2024 · Grade 7 · English——
2024 · Grade 8 · English——
2024 · Grade 3 · Math——
2024 · Grade 4 · Math——
2024 · Grade 5 · Math——
2024 · Grade 6 · Math5—
2024 · Grade 7 · Math——
2024 · Grade 8 · Math——
2023 · Grade 3 · English4—
2023 · Grade 4 · English5—
2023 · Grade 5 · English4—
2023 · Grade 6 · English6—
2023 · Grade 7 · English5—
2023 · Grade 8 · English9—
2023 · Grade 3 · Math4—
2023 · Grade 4 · Math5—
2023 · Grade 5 · Math4—
2023 · Grade 6 · Math5—
2023 · Grade 7 · Math5—
2023 · Grade 8 · Math9—
2022 · Grade 3 · English6—
2022 · Grade 4 · English4—
2022 · Grade 5 · English——
2022 · Grade 6 · English——
2022 · Grade 7 · English10—
2022 · Grade 8 · English8—
2022 · Grade 3 · Math6—
2022 · Grade 4 · Math4—
2022 · Grade 5 · Math——
2022 · Grade 6 · Math——
2022 · Grade 7 · Math10—
2022 · Grade 8 · Math8—
2019 · Grade 3 · English10—
2019 · Grade 4 · English8—
2019 · Grade 5 · English1850%
2019 · Grade 6 · English9—
2019 · Grade 7 · English9—
2019 · Grade 8 · English5—
2019 · Grade 3 · Math10—
2019 · Grade 4 · Math8—
2019 · Grade 5 · Math1811%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math9—
2019 · Grade 7 · Math9—
2019 · Grade 8 · Math5—
2018 · Grade 3 · English——
2018 · Grade 4 · English1450%
2018 · Grade 5 · English——
2018 · Grade 6 · English——
2018 · Grade 7 · English——
2018 · Grade 8 · English——
2018 · Grade 3 · Math——
2018 · Grade 4 · Math1443%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math——
2018 · Grade 6 · Math——
2018 · Grade 7 · Math——
2018 · Grade 8 · Math——
2017 · Grade 3 · English1471%
2017 · Grade 4 · English1267%
2017 · Grade 5 · English——
2017 · Grade 6 · English——
2017 · Grade 7 · English——
2017 · Grade 8 · English——
2017 · Grade 3 · Math1464%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math1250%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math——
2017 · Grade 6 · Math——
2017 · Grade 7 · Math——
2017 · Grade 8 · Math——

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 5 of 61 → 2025–26 · 4 of 86
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0 of 63 → 2025–26 · 1.1% (1 of 91) · +1.1 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female—3 of 44—
Male—1 of 42—
Hispanic or Latino—2 of 33—
White—1 of 37—
Students with disabilities—0 of 21—
Low-income—3 of 34—
All students—4 of 86—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$19,796 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 318 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

District current expense · FY 2024–25$30,668 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 65%Instruction support 6%Student services 11%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 10%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$5,157,53864.53%65%
Instruction support$459,7605.75%6%
Student services$900,82311.27%11%
Administration$646,2408.09%8%
Buildings & maintenance$828,20710.36%10%
Total$7,992,568100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $7,992,568 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$19,796 per pupil
2020$20,757 per pupil
2019$20,036 per pupil
2018$990 per pupil
2017$1,327 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 93222 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 93222 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$69,337
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)43%
ZIP-area population2,721
Median age48.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93222 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/peak-to-peak-mountain-charter-8504"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Peak to Peak Mountain Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026

  • No student group comparison is shown for this school this year: either no group had 30 or more students tested in each subject, or no same-grade district or state rate was available for its groups.
  • Its Scope Score is an elementary school score; results for its other grades are in these records.

How we analyzeRequest a correction