Independent charter school · Eureka City Schools

Pacific View Charter 2.0 — Rating & test scores

115 Henderson Street, Eureka · 152 students · Grades K–12

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 67

Needs SupportScope Score · 7th percentile. Higher than 7 in 100 of the 5,726 California public elementary schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Well below California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 13% and 13% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 53
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 3, 4 and 5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).

This rating covers grades 3–5. Pacific View Charter 2.0 teaches K–12.

For grades 6–8, the standing among California middle schools is in Tests ↓

Overview

Is Pacific View Charter 2.0 a good elementary school?

Needs Support. Pacific View Charter 2.0 is lower than most California elementary schools on test results, progress in both subjects and attendance.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced113%
Math, Proficient or Advanced513%
English, Advanced189%
Math, Advanced156%

Progress in a year, 2025

English15−9 pts
Math6−16 pts

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance2424 in 100
Pacific View Charter 2.0’s place among California elementary schools, out of 100Eureka City Schools’s other elementary schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

Each bar is Pacific View Charter 2.0’s place among 5,726 California public elementary schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 3–5. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

In its own words

What does Pacific View Charter 2.0 say about itself?

These lines come from the school’s own website. They are the school’s description. They are not parent reviews or test results.

“To support every student in achieving their full potential.”
pacificviewcharter.org · link not verified, read October 23, 2026

  • How it teaches

    A mix of teacher support, independent learning, and technology helps students take ownership of learning.

    See the page · link not verified

Every line here is from pacificviewcharter.org, read October 23, 2026.

Progress

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 4–6 scored 9 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 16 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

English

−9

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income41−9 points
White26−20 points
Students with disabilities22−16 points
Hispanic or Latino13+9 points
Two or More Races11−5 points

Math

−16

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income41−20 points
White26−13 points
Students with disabilities22−28 points
Hispanic or Latino13−13 points
Two or More Races11−19 points

Grades 4–6, 2025, 53 students with scores in both years. Faded rows have fewer than 40 students. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.

How the state’s growth measure works

The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 9 points below that expected score, and in math 16 points below it.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

6 of the 7 elementary schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Pacific View Charter 2.0. Each school is compared with every California elementary school.

Scope Score

8 elementary schools within 4.3 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. WashingtonNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7656th
  2. CuttenCutten Elementary · by addressScope Score 7551st
  3. GrantNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7441st
  4. LafayetteNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7022nd
  5. Redwood Coast MontessoriCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 7020th
  6. Alice BirneyNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 6911th
  7. Pacific View Charter 2.0Scope Score 677th
  8. Peninsula UnionPeninsula Union · by addressScope Score 63bottom 1%
Eureka City SchoolsA neighborhood school in another districtCharter

A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats.

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.

25%50%0%25%50%75%100%

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does Pacific View Charter 2.0 compare with schools like it?

Pacific View Charter 2.0’s Scope Score is 67. 1,155 California elementary schools, counting Pacific View Charter 2.0, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 72. Pacific View Charter 2.0’s result is higher than 121 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 1,155

  1. Students from low-income families: 73%

    Scope Score 89Strong · 92nd percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 73%

    Scope Score 89Strong · 92nd percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 72%

    Scope Score 88Strong · 91st percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 73%

    Scope Score 88Strong · 90th percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 76%

    Scope Score 87Strong · 90th percentile

1,155 California public elementary schools where 72% to 84% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public elementary school we score where 72% to 84% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Pacific View Charter 2.0’s share. The count includes Pacific View Charter 2.0. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were lower than in 2025. English went from 27% to 13% and math from 18% to 13%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2018 to 2026

Grades 3–5. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%201820192022202320242025202629%34%46%CaliforniaCalifornia31%Eureka City SchoolsDistrict13%Pacific View Charter 2.0This school

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%201820192022202320242025202628%26%42%CaliforniaCalifornia25%Eureka City SchoolsDistrict13%Pacific View Charter 2.0This school

The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Eureka City Schools’s line combines its 5 elementary schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Eureka City Schools’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 3–5: share at the top two levels
SpringPacific View Charter 2.0Eureka City SchoolsCaliforniaTested here
201834%29%49%58
201921%27%50%58
202227%27%45%41
202328%29%44%43
202429%26%45%45
202527%29%46%55
202613%31%46%53
Math, grades 3–5: share at the top two levels
SpringPacific View Charter 2.0Eureka City SchoolsCaliforniaTested here
201826%28%42%58
201917%25%44%58
202217%27%38%41
202321%27%40%43
202413%25%41%45
202518%26%41%55
202613%25%42%53

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

Well below California in both subjects.

English

13%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

64239
Eureka City Schools31%California46%

Math

13%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

60277
Eureka City Schools25%California42%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 13% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 13% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

How does grade 6 do?

In grade 6, spring 2026, 33% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 11% in math, against 48% and 37% across California. Fewer than 30 students tested, so one year’s result can change a lot. Ask how results looked in other years. The middle grades are placed separately: 16th percentile (Needs Support) among California’s middle schools.

English

33%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

6727
Eureka City Schools26%California48%

Math

11%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

781111
Eureka City Schools20%California37%

How do the high school grades do?

In grade 11, spring 2026, 27% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and none in math, against 57% and 32% across California. Fewer than 30 students tested, so one year’s result can change a lot. Ask how results looked in other years.

English

27%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

5518918
Eureka City Schools46%California57%

Math

0%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

8218
Eureka City Schools20%California32%
Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced8%21%6%
Advanced8%17%0%
Proficient0%4%6%
Developing level17%21%29%
Minimal75%58%65%
Tested122417
California44%46%49%
Difference−36−25−43
English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced33%suppressedsuppressed
Advanced6%suppressedsuppressed
Proficient27%suppressedsuppressed
Developing level0%suppressedsuppressed
Minimal67%suppressedsuppressed
Tested1846
California48%51%49%
Difference−15——
English, grade 11: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 11
Proficient or Advanced27%
Advanced18%
Proficient9%
Developing level18%
Minimal55%
Tested11
California57%
Difference−30

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced0%17%18%
Advanced0%4%12%
Proficient0%13%6%
Developing level17%33%23%
Minimal83%50%59%
Tested122417
California47%42%37%
Difference−47−25−19
Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced11%suppressedsuppressed
Advanced0%suppressedsuppressed
Proficient11%suppressedsuppressed
Developing level11%suppressedsuppressed
Minimal78%suppressedsuppressed
Tested1846
California37%38%36%
Difference−26——
Math, grade 11: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 11
Proficient or Advanced0%
Advanced0%
Proficient0%
Developing level18%
Minimal82%
Tested11
California32%
Difference−32

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 3–5 · This school9%4%23%64%53
English, grades 3–5 · California24%22%21%33%1,208,894
English, grades 3–5 · Eureka City Schools13%18%27%42%681
Math, grades 3–5 · This school6%7%27%60%53
Math, grades 3–5 · California21%21%25%33%1,211,701
Math, grades 3–5 · Eureka City Schools9%16%30%45%681
English, grade 11 · This school18%9%18%55%11
English, grade 11 · California27%30%21%22%414,559
English, grade 11 · Eureka City Schools18%28%22%32%270
Math, grade 11 · This school0%0%18%82%11
Math, grade 11 · California16%16%20%48%413,523
Math, grade 11 · Eureka City Schools9%11%19%61%270
English, grade 6 · This school6%27%0%67%18
English, grade 6 · California20%28%24%28%415,439
English, grade 6 · Eureka City Schools7%19%24%50%222
Math, grade 6 · This school0%11%11%78%18
Math, grade 6 · California21%16%25%38%415,904
Math, grade 6 · Eureka City Schools8%12%22%58%224

Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined: 53 tested in English, 53 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

White students are the largest group here, at 44% of students. 44 of 180 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

24in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (44 of 180 students).

At the average Eureka City Schools elementary school: 21 in 100. At the average California elementary school: 17 in 100.

Students, 2024–25

152

students in grades K–12.

White 44%Two or more races 23%Hispanic or Latino 21%American Indian or Alaska Native 8%

Family income

78%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 119 of 152. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

16

teachers, with 8 years of experience on average.

6% were in their first year.

84% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

Suspensions, 2025–26

0

students were suspended at least once. Average California elementary school 1.6%.

Sources: California Department of Education. Each tile names its year.

Missing school, by grade
Grades 4–6
4 of 69 students in grades 4–6 were chronically absent.
Grades 7–8
3 of 14 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent.
Grades 9–12
33 of 69 students in grades 9–12 were chronically absent.

Our records hold no figure for Grades K–3.

Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
White44%
Two or more races23%
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Native8%
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 9.7 of 11.6 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Low-income students scored well below the same group across California in English.

This schoolThe same group, California
  • Low-incomeEnglish · 44 tested20%California 37%
  • Low-incomeMath · 44 tested16%California 27%

20% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 3–6, spring 2026), against 37% for the same group across California.

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–6, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results, with the district

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–6 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Eureka City Schoolsvs California
Low-income · 44 tested · grades 4–6 only
English20%−525%−1737%
Math16%−218%−1127%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Eureka City Schools, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

After high school

How many students here graduate, and where do they go next?

94% of students graduated in four years in 2024–25. That compares with 89% across California. 17% were ready for college or career (state measure) in 2024–25. 27% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months.

Graduation, college and university records

Preparation · each measure describes a different student group

Graduated in four years

94%

Across California: 89%

2024–25 · 17 of 18 students who started 9th grade together

Ready for college or career (state measure)

17%

Across California: 52%

2024–25 · 3 of 18 students in the state’s measure

Finished the UC/CSU course list

6%

Average California high school: 56%

2024–25 · 1 of 17 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list

Destinations · class of 2023

Where students who finished high school went

27% enrolled in college within 12 months · 15 students who finished high school

  • University of California0 · 0%
  • California State University0 · 0%
  • California community college4 · 27%
  • In-state private0 · 0%
  • Out-of-state, 4-year0 · 0%
  • Out-of-state, 2-year0 · 0%
  • Not enrolled11 · 73%

Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: each count divided by all high-school completers (graduates and other students who finished), rounded together so they total 100. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.

Where the class of 2023 went
27%enrolled in college within a year

15 completers, class of 2023

  • University of California0 (0%)
  • California State University0 (0%)
  • California community college4 (27%)
  • In-state private0 (0%)
  • Out-of-state, 4-year0 (0%)
  • Out-of-state, 2-year0 (0%)
  • Not enrolled11 (73%)

Source: CDE’s college-going rate for the class of 2023 (enrolled in college within 12 months). Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers, rounded together so they total 100. A dash means we have no figure for that row; it isn’t zero.

Where these figures come fromEach measure’s source, student group and definition
Graduated in four years
2024–25 · 17 of 18 students who started 9th grade together. California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.
Ready for college or career (state measure)
2024–25 · 3 of 18 students in the state’s measure. California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator (CCI), overall “Prepared” rate, among the students in the indicator’s group. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.
Finished the UC/CSU course list
2024–25 · 1 of 17 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list. California Department of Education, A–G completion records (graduates who met the UC/CSU course requirements). Course completion is separate from college enrollment.
Where students who finished high school went
CDE college-going records, class of 2023. College enrollment is counted for 12 months after finishing high school and matched to college records, so this runs about two years behind. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Advanced courses on record

What other courses and pathways are on record?

College courses in high school (dual enrollment)
2 students took one

2023–24

Students taking a college course for credit while in high school, often through a community college. Federal Civil Rights Data Collection, school-reported.

Family and staff answers

What would families tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Pacific View Charter 2.0. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

The neighborhood

What is the area around Pacific View Charter 2.0 like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 95501. They are not figures for the families at Pacific View Charter 2.0.

Typical household income in a year

$54,137

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 95501.

Typical home value
$412,300
People who live in this ZIP code
22,890
Typical age
39.5 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
32%

What you can do

Who can act on Pacific View Charter 2.0’s results?

Pacific View Charter 2.0’s own board decides its plan.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Pacific View Charter 2.0 in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Extra state help

The state is giving Pacific View Charter 2.0 extra help in 2026, because of results for all students.

Extra help for Pacific View Charter 2.0: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2026 California School Dashboard. Source 

Reading screening in kindergarten through grade 2

California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.

Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.

If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.

Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.

California Education Code § 53008. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 7 questions to Pacific View Charter 2.0. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What is the school doing about chronic absence?24 in 100 chronically absent, 2025–26 (44 of 180 students); 7 in 100 in 2024–25
  2. What changes for a student who falls behind in math?16 points lower in math than California students who had the same score the year before, grades 4–6, 2025 (53 students)
  3. How does this approach show up in an ordinary lesson?From its own words, on how it teaches.

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

How do I get in?

Ask Pacific View Charter 2.0 how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

Where it is

Where is Pacific View Charter 2.0?

Address
115 Henderson Street, Eureka 95501Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
James MalloyAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated February 9, 2023.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 7 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Pacific View Charter 2.0 how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Pacific View Charter 2.0 a good school?

Pacific View Charter 2.0 has a Scope Score of 67. It scored higher than 7 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools (Needs Support, 7th percentile, spring 2026).

  • Grades 6–8: higher than 16 in 100 California middle schools we score (16th percentile, Needs Support, spring 2026)

See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 24 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 21 in 100 at the average Eureka City Schools elementary school. 0 of 184 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. See the details ↓

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 4–6 scored 9 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 16 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

  • Included in this measure: 53 students

See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 20% of low-income students in grades 4–6 at Pacific View Charter 2.0 in Eureka scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 37% for the same group across California. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $2.5 million is planned for 8 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s all of its general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does Pacific View Charter 2.0’s own plan commit to?

$2.5 million is planned for 8 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s all of its general fund budget.

$2.5million

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Basic Services$1.1 million
  • Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study$310,043
  • Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math$295,358

These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 72 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 72 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 70% of the money. The plan itself puts 60% of it toward staff.

  • Basic Services $1.1 million
  • Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study $310,043
  • Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math $295,358
  • 5 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

2 of the plan’s 8 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

  • Reading $295,358
  • Math $295,358
  • Catch-up help $22,997

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math$295,358
  • Full MTSS implementation and data driven continous improvement plans$22,997
For high-need students

It plans $900,850 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $1.1 million and estimates it spent $925,587, $185,883 (17%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $185,883 under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $573,032 (19%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Basic Services, which went from $1.5 million to $1.1 million.

Largest cuts

  • Basic Services−⁠$393,075
  • Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math−⁠$107,181
  • Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study−⁠$107,180

Largest increases

  • Success for Students with Disabilities+⁠$30,663
  • Campus Improvements+⁠$16,881

Ask: What did Basic Services pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $393,075 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 3–5 only: 13% in English and 13% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 226%20%down 6 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 212%11%down 1 pt
Suspended at least onceGoal 20.5%0 of 184down 0.5 pts

Goal 1 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Basic Services · $1,127,969
  • Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study · $310,043
  • Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math · $295,358
The full plan2 goals, 15 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($2.5 million).

Where does the money go?

75% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Over the next three years, Pacific View Charter School will develop and implement a comprehensive…$1.9 million75% of action budgets

“Over the next three years, Pacific View Charter School will develop and implement a comprehensive, data-driven Multiple Tiered System of Support (MTSS) school framework that integrates all students' academic, behavioral, and social-emotional support. This framework will be built upon a foundation of strong collaboration and communication among students, staff, parents, and the community” p. 9 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.4 million (−⁠$496,514)

Largest funded actions

  1. Basic Services$1.1 millionaction 1.1 · p. 35 ↗
  2. Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study$0.3 millionaction 1.2 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Campus Improvements$0.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 35 ↗
  4. Community School Implementation and Engagement$0.2 millionaction 1.3 · p. 35 ↗
  5. Full MTSS implementation and data driven continous improvement plansunder $0.1 millionaction 1.4 · p. 35 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Basic Services−⁠$0.4 million$1.5 million → $1.1 million · p. 35 ↗
  2. Access and Enrollment in a Broad Course of Study−⁠$107,180$417,223 → $310,043 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Campus Improvements+⁠$16,881$229,688 → $246,569 · p. 35 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Community School Implementation and Engagement · $150,000 → $150,000 · p. 35 ↗unchanged
  • Full MTSS implementation and data driven continous improvement plans · $36,137 → $22,997 · p. 35 ↗−⁠$13,140

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 9 ↗.

Goal 2 · Focus GoalOver the next three years, Pacific View Charter School will focus on significantly improving student…$618,58425% of action budgets

“Over the next three years, Pacific View Charter School will focus on significantly improving student achievement as measured by the California School Dashboard and local academic indicators. By June 2027, PVCS aims to: 1. Increase the percentage of students meeting or exceeding standards in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics on state assessments by at least 20 percentage points, with a particular focus on closing achievement gaps for student groups in the "Red" and "Orange" categories. 2. Ensure that all student groups, including those currently in the "Red" and "Orange" categories, demonstrate continuous improvement and progress toward the "Green" or "Blue" performance levels on the California School Dashboard. 3. Implement a robust, standards-aligned curriculum and instructional practices that promote critical thinking, problem-solving, and college and career readiness skills across all grade levels. 4. Utilize formative and summative assessments to regularly monitor student progress, inform instruction, and provide targeted interventions and support to students who are struggling academically. 5. Provide ongoing professional development and collaboration opportunities for teachers and staff to enhance their skills in data analysis, differentiated instruction, and evidence-based practices that support student learning and achievement” p. 19 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $695,102 (−⁠$76,518)

Largest funded actions

  1. Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math$295,358action 2.1 · p. 35 ↗
  2. Success for Students with Disabilities$282,343action 2.2 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Post Secondary Success for all Students$40,883action 2.3 · p. 35 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Diagnostic and Student Prescription for ELA and Math−⁠$107,181$402,539 → $295,358 · p. 35 ↗
  2. Success for Students with Disabilities+⁠$30,663$251,680 → $282,343 · p. 35 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Post Secondary Success for all Students · $40,883 → $40,883 · p. 35 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 8 measures · 1 quoted

  • Graduation Rate: Incorporates Middle and High School Drop out Rates. P5 p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    93.8% graduation rate (2023 Dashboard Data)
    Target for year 3
    Maintain or exceed state average of 87.8% (2025 Dashboard)

7 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 14 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
14
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census BureauU.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil RightsNational Student Clearinghouse
State test years
2018–2026

Results

Students

After high school

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #5,299 of 5,726 California elementary schools we score · #5 of 5 in Eureka City Schools
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math7%3642%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math12%2623%
Chronically absent24 in 100415%
Suspension rate0 of 184615%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)+7.6pp—not scored

Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 75%: the remaining 25%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–26677#5299California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–19not on filenot on file+10
2021–22not on filenot on file−10
2022–23not on filenot on file+17
2023–245 in 1001.6% (3 of 185)+16
2024–257 in 1000.5% (1 of 189)−3
2025–2624 in 1000 of 184+8

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 3 and grade 5 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2018–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English929%20%
2026 · Math924%11%
2025 · English1006%26%
2025 · Math1003%12%
2024 · English896%29%
2024 · Math894%10%
2023 · English786%24%
2023 · Math783%12%
2022 · English836%25%
2022 · Math834%10%
2019 · English958%31%
2019 · Math956%16%
2018 · English10216%35%
2018 · Math10316%26%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 3 · English1932%
2025 · Grade 4 · English157%
2025 · Grade 5 · English2138%
2025 · Grade 6 · English1839%
2025 · Grade 7 · English5—
2025 · Grade 8 · English6—
2025 · Grade 11 · English1612%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math1926%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math1513%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math2114%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math186%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math5—
2025 · Grade 8 · Math6—
2025 · Grade 11 · Math166%
2024 · Grade 3 · English119%
2024 · Grade 4 · English1833%
2024 · Grade 5 · English1638%
2024 · Grade 6 · English1233%
2024 · Grade 7 · English4—
2024 · Grade 8 · English9—
2024 · Grade 11 · English1932%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math119%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math1817%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math1612%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math128%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math4—
2024 · Grade 8 · Math9—
2024 · Grade 11 · Math195%
2023 · Grade 3 · English1217%
2023 · Grade 4 · English1513%
2023 · Grade 5 · English1650%
2023 · Grade 6 · English138%
2023 · Grade 7 · English7—
2023 · Grade 8 · English7—
2023 · Grade 11 · English8—
2023 · Grade 3 · Math1225%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math1513%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math1625%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math130%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math7—
2023 · Grade 8 · Math7—
2023 · Grade 11 · Math8—
2022 · Grade 3 · English1225%
2022 · Grade 4 · English1443%
2022 · Grade 5 · English1513%
2022 · Grade 6 · English130%
2022 · Grade 7 · English7—
2022 · Grade 8 · English7—
2022 · Grade 11 · English1540%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math128%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math1443%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math150%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math138%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math7—
2022 · Grade 8 · Math7—
2022 · Grade 11 · Math150%
2019 · Grade 3 · English2020%
2019 · Grade 4 · English1811%
2019 · Grade 5 · English2030%
2019 · Grade 6 · English2045%
2019 · Grade 7 · English——
2019 · Grade 8 · English5—
2019 · Grade 11 · English10—
2019 · Grade 3 · Math2015%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math1811%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math2025%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math2020%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math——
2019 · Grade 8 · Math5—
2019 · Grade 11 · Math10—
2018 · Grade 3 · English1921%
2018 · Grade 4 · English1839%
2018 · Grade 5 · English2143%
2018 · Grade 6 · English2157%
2018 · Grade 7 · English——
2018 · Grade 8 · English——
2018 · Grade 11 · English1513%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math1921%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math1839%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math2119%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math2152%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math——
2018 · Grade 8 · Math——
2018 · Grade 11 · Math150%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide360%6%83%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income4420%−5−17
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students−953Moderate−1653Moderate
English-only students−1050not categorized−1550not categorized
Low-income−941Moderate−2041Moderate
White−2026Moderate−1326Moderate
Students with disabilities−1622Moderate−2822Minimal
Hispanic or Latino+913Accelerated−1313Moderate
Two or more races−511Average−1911Moderate

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4–6. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure
California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English−9 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4–6

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4–6

53 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, English: −9 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

State model · math−16 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4–6

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4–6

53 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, math: −16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median English estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4–6, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 7 in 100 → 2025–26 · 24 in 100 · +17 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0.5% (1 of 189) → 2025–26 · 0 of 184 · −0.5 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female—17 of 85—
Male—27 of 93—
Hispanic or Latino—5 of 38—
American Indian or Alaska Native—2 of 15—
Two or more races—14 of 42—
White—22 of 80—
Students with disabilities—10 of 45—
Homeless—4 of 15—
Low-income—25 in 100—
All students—24 in 100—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Advanced coursework, federal snapshot2023–24 · Civil Rights Data Collection · dated historical snapshot
MeasureThis school
AP offerednot reported
AP course countnot reported
AP enrollment (male/female)not reported
IB participationnot reported
Dual enrollmentoffered · 2 enrolled
Algebra I in grade 8not offered
Calculus sections0
Physics sections0
Chemistry sections1
Reported male/female enrollment (CRDC)143

These counts aren’t part of the Scope Score. “Not reported” means the federal record has no value for that item; it isn’t a zero. Enrollment counts add the male and female students the survey reports.

College destinationsclass of 2023 · state college-going records, 12 months after graduation
DestinationCompleters% (derived)
University of California00%
California State University00%
California community college427%
In-state private00%
Out-of-state, 4-year00%
Out-of-state, 2-year00%
Not enrolled1173%

15 students who finished high school, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 27% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ all who finished high school; CDE calls them completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,610 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 3,540 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,558 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 13%Student services 15%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 12%Other 1%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$32,307,05652.10%52%
Instruction support$8,438,62413.61%13%
Student services$9,100,69014.68%15%
Administration$4,442,9957.17%7%
Buildings & maintenance$7,259,42411.71%12%
Other$460,4150.74%1%
Total$62,009,204100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $62,009,204 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$12,610 per pupil
2020$12,178 per pupil
2019$12,986 per pupil
2018$12,082 per pupil
2017$11,534 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 95501 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 95501 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$54,137
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)32%
ZIP-area population22,890
Median age39.5 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95501 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/pacific-view-charter-2-0-0150"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Pacific View Charter 2.0 — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · federal civil rights data (CRDC) 2023–24, a past snapshot · state college-going records, class of 2023, matched to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment · Data updated October 15, 2026

  • Its Scope Score is an elementary school score; results for its other grades are in these records.

How we analyzeRequest a correction