Paakuma K-8: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Paakuma K-8 posts 54% meeting the standard, and 25.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 52 | 25% | 54% | -15.4 | 12.3% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Paakuma K-8 scores 52 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 71st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. Paakuma K-8 deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Bernardino, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Paakuma K-8's low-income kids hit 52.1% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 71st percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 54% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 61% | 55% | 45% | 42% | 64% |
| Grade 4 | 52% | 50% | 56% | 49% | 48% |
| Grade 5 | 63% | 55% | 53% | 66% | 57% |
| Grade 6 | 34% | 50% | 46% | 38% | 61% |
| Grade 7 | 51% | 55% | 57% | 57% | 62% |
| Grade 8 | 50% | 58% | 51% | 61% | 61% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 64% | 56% | 55% | 39% | 66% |
| Grade 4 | 45% | 49% | 57% | 47% | 48% |
| Grade 5 | 42% | 30% | 29% | 50% | 42% |
| Grade 6 | 23% | 31% | 26% | 35% | 40% |
| Grade 7 | 22% | 41% | 28% | 31% | 33% |
| Grade 8 | 39% | 32% | 45% | 36% | 40% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 13.2pp across grades; the floor slips 6.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Paakuma K-8's most underrated number
52.1% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Paakuma K-8 in San Bernardino, 52.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Paakuma K-8 outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (56.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 361 students tested.
7 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 20.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.1pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.3% vs 10.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$639 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 940 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 35% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Paakuma K-8 a good elementary school?
What are Paakuma K-8's CAASPP test scores?
How does Paakuma K-8 rank in California?
Is Paakuma K-8 getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Paakuma K-8?
How does Paakuma K-8 compare to other schools in San Bernardino?
How does Paakuma K-8 serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 42
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 107 | 37% | 26% | 20% | 17% | 64% | +20 |
| Grade 4 | 104 | 23% | 25% | 21% | 31% | 48% | +3 |
| Grade 5 | 116 | 24% | 33% | 16% | 28% | 57% | +9 |
| Grade 6 | 129 | 16% | 45% | 26% | 12% | 61% | +15 |
| Grade 7 | 106 | 24% | 39% | 22% | 16% | 62% | +15 |
| Grade 8 | 109 | 20% | 41% | 25% | 14% | 61% | +15 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 107 | 29% | 37% | 22% | 12% | 66% | +21 |
| Grade 4 | 104 | 16% | 32% | 31% | 21% | 48% | +6 |
| Grade 5 | 116 | 22% | 20% | 28% | 30% | 42% | +7 |
| Grade 6 | 129 | 16% | 24% | 33% | 26% | 40% | +5 |
| Grade 7 | 106 | 14% | 19% | 34% | 33% | 33% | −1 |
| Grade 8 | 109 | 25% | 16% | 23% | 37% | 40% | +8 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 225 | 12% | 24% | 58% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 361 | 52.1% | +18 | +14 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 442 | 56.6% | +21 | +18 |
| White | 93 | 69.9% | +20 | +8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paakuma K-8 ← | — | 52 | 25.4% | 54.2% | −15.4 | 1.1% |
| W.J.C. Trapp Elementary | 3 mi | 43 | 20.5% | 53.1% | −26.4 | 1.4% |
| Nancy R. Kordyak Elementary | 1.4 mi | 42 | 13.3% | 38.9% | +2.6 | 1.0% |
| Dr. Edward Fitzgerald Elementary | 1.4 mi | 41 | 12.3% | 29.7% | +4.8 | 3.0% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 49 | 65 | #1927 | 28.4% | 54.6% | 9.1% | 2.4% | -10.3pp |
| 2022 | 37 | 52 | #2731 | 20.6% | 48.9% | 28.2% | 1.4% | -12.7pp |
| 2023 | 43 | 60 | #2305 | 21.4% | 49.1% | 21.6% | 3.3% | -8.9pp |
| 2024 | 50 | 68 | #1827 | 23.1% | 48.8% | 13.9% | 2.9% | +17.5pp |
| 2025 | 52 | 71 | #1687 | 25.4% | 54.2% | 12.3% | 1.1% | -15.4pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 9.5% | 12.2% | +2.7pp |
| Male | 8.8% | 11.8% | +3.0pp |
| Asian | 10.0% | 4.0% | -6.0pp |
| Black/African American | 7.8% | 16.9% | +9.1pp |
| Filipino | 10.0% | — | — |
| White | 3.3% | 0.0% | -3.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 10.3% | 12.3% | +2.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 8.8% | 18.2% | +9.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 14.5% | 19.7% | +5.2pp |
| English Learners | 12.8% | 6.8% | -6.0pp |
| Foster Youth | 0.0% | 18.2% | +18.2pp |
| Homeless | 22.0% | 28.3% | +6.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 12.8% | 17.8% | +5.0pp |
| All Students | 9.1% | 12.0% | +2.9pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction