ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Ocia A. Peters Elementary · Garden Grove

Ocia A. Peters Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Ocia A. Peters posts 56% meeting the standard, and 38.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

13162 Newhope Street, 92843 (opens in new tab)·Garden Grove Unified·Garden Grove·Grades TK-6·893 students·83% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 663-6085·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5845
% Exceeded39%21%
% Met+56%43%
Growth-18.9-2.9
Absence14.1%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
58
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #1,146 statewide · #13 of 44 in Garden Grove Unified

Ocia A. Peters Elementary scores 58 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 80th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “56% proficient” and call it done. Ocia A. Peters deserves a closer read. The school sits in Garden Grove, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Ocia A. Peters's low-income kids hit 55.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 80th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 56% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%54%46%55%65%
Grade 466%47%50%46%57%
Grade 559%46%48%62%48%
Grade 660%56%58%57%73%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 356%46%48%53%68%
Grade 461%42%46%38%53%
Grade 547%35%46%50%47%
Grade 658%55%46%52%62%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

50%
15%
35%
Grade 3 · 65% proficient
41%
15%
44%
Grade 4 · 56% proficient
32%
17%
51%
Grade 5 · 49% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 18.7pp across grades; the floor slips 16.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

55.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Ocia A. Peters's most underrated number

55.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Ocia A. Peters low-income: 55.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
38.8%
State 21.3%
17.5pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-18.9pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
56.3%
State 42.7%
13.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.1%
State 17.9%
3.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.3%
State 18.0%
0.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Ocia A. Peters Elementary in Garden Grove, 55.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ocia A. Peters Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (51.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 427 students tested.

All students at this school: 59% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 59%, district —, state 43%59%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 53%, district 50%, state 32%53% · −6 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 40%, district 38%, state 32%40% · −18 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 54%, district 56%, state 44%54% · −5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 64%, district 55%, state 42%64% · +5 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 84%, district 78%, state 72%84% · +25 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 19%, district 21%, state 11%19% · −40 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 28%, district 21%, state 15%28% · −31 vs school

5 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 15.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.1%, district 14.5%, state 17.9%14.1% · −3.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −0.9pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (26.5% vs 10.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.5%
TK/K26.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 23:127:1
Teaching staff41 teachers
Avg. experience17.5 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$72,504 – $141,634
Principal salary$181,381 – $218,095
Superintendent salary$370,605

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,478, CA average $14,815$22,478 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,082 per student

$1,082 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,744 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support11%
Student services11%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,737 per pupil
2019$13,697 per pupil
2018$13,564 per pupil
2017$12,765 per pupil
2016$11,487 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic59.6%
District 53.2% · CA 56.1%
Asian35.4%
District 35.5% · CA 10.2%
White2.8%
District 6.0% · CA 19.9%
Other2.2%
District 4.8% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 82.9% (19pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$747K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+18% · CA 35%
ZIP population46,414
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 893 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ocia A. Peters Elementary a good elementary school?

Ocia A. Peters Elementary has a Scope Score of 58 out of 100, placing it in the 80th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,146 statewide. 38.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 17.5 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Ocia A. Peters Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 56.3% of students at Ocia A. Peters Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 38.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 38.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 759 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Ocia A. Peters Elementary rank in California?

Ocia A. Peters Elementary ranks #1,146 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 80th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Ocia A. Peters Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Ocia A. Peters Elementary decreases by 18.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Ocia A. Peters Elementary?

14.1% of students at Ocia A. Peters Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Ocia A. Peters Elementary compare to other schools in Garden Grove?

Ocia A. Peters Elementary scores 58/100 (80th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 893 students. Use the schools in Garden Grove page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Ocia A. Peters Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Ocia A. Peters Elementary in Garden Grove, 55.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ocia A. Peters Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (51.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 427 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
38.8%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 67th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-18.9pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 52th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
56.3%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 60th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.1%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 56th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 57th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310350%15%13%22%65%+22
Grade 415041%15%11%32%57%+12
Grade 512632%17%20%32%48%+1
Grade 614238%35%18%10%73%+26
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310346%22%12%20%68%+22
Grade 415135%18%24%23%53%+11
Grade 512629%18%20%33%47%+12
Grade 614537%25%14%24%62%+27
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1112618%15%51%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged42755.0%−0+17
Hispanic/Latino29743.8%−2+5
Asian20183.6%+4+9
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Ocia A. Peters Elementary ←5838.8%56.3%−18.90.7%
A. G. Cook Elementary1.8 mi7557.0%80.4%−12.10.4%
John Murdy Elementary2.5 mi6940.6%69.5%+13.70.7%
Susan B. Anthony Elementary2.5 mi6843.3%68.2%−14.50.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196181#104635.7%56.9%6.3%1.3%-1.1pp
20224161#225126.4%45.0%30.5%1.1%-9.5pp
20235276#135531.2%47.4%28.6%1.7%-0.2pp
20246082#103932.4%50.6%16.3%0.5%+2.1pp
20255880#114638.8%56.3%14.1%0.7%-18.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.5%12.5%+6.0pp
Male6.2%15.4%+9.2pp
Asian3.8%5.0%+1.2pp
Filipino0.0%
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino8.0%19.6%+11.6pp
Students with Disabilities4.9%26.7%+21.8pp
English Learners8.1%19.1%+11.0pp
Homeless14.3%15.4%+1.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7.0%15.6%+8.6pp
All Students6.3%13.9%+7.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction