ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Mountain Vista Middle · Kelseyville

Mountain Vista Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Mountain Vista posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 2.3pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

5081 Konocti Road, 95451 (opens in new tab)·Kelseyville Unified·Kelseyville·Grades 6-8·405 students·70% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(707) 279-4060·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3043
% Exceeded2%17%
% Met+15%39%
Growth+2.3+1.5
Absence6.8%18.5%
Suspension7.5%3.7%
Scope Score
30
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,731 statewide

Mountain Vista Middle scores 30 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 23rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Mountain Vista deserves a closer read. The school sits in Kelseyville, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 6.8% chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 9th to the 23rd percentile of California middle schools since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Maintained)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 15% meet the standard today, versus 25% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 646%20%14%17%18%
Grade 724%27%14%11%19%
Grade 829%31%29%17%26%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 617%11%4%14%8%
Grade 714%9%6%5%17%
Grade 818%4%6%7%5%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

17%
82%
Grade 6 · 18% proficient
13%
80%
Grade 7 · 20% proficient
23%
74%
Grade 8 · 26% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
2.4%
State 16.8%
14.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+2.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
15.5%
State 39.3%
23.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
6.8%
State 18.5%
11.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
7.5%
State 3.7%
3.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.2%
State 18.0%
3.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Mountain Vista Middle in Kelseyville, 15.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 19.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mountain Vista Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 290 students tested.

All students at this school: 15% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 15%, district —, state 39%15%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 11%, district 15%, state 32%11% · −4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 12%, district 14%, state 32%12% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 13%, district 17%, state 42%13% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 18%, district 21%, state 44%18% · +3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 18%, district 23%, state 56%18% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 4%, state 11%2% · −14 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 2%, district 7%, state 15%2% · −13 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 26%, district 23%, state 56%26% · +11 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 6.8%, district 20.0%, state 18.5%6.8% · −11.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 7.5%, district —, state 3.7%7.5% · +3.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.2%
Grades 7–86.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 21:123:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience7.8 years
Fully credentialed49%
First-year teachers10%
Intern / emergency permit18.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$51,563 – $100,220
Principal salary$135,319 – $143,365
Superintendent salary$200,625

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,116, CA average $14,815$17,116 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$695 per student

$695 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,300 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction54%
Instruction support10%
Student services17%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,210 per pupil
2019$13,490 per pupil
2018$14,408 per pupil
2017$13,037 per pupil
2016$12,449 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic50.4%
District 46.7% · CA 56.1%
White38.3%
District 41.6% · CA 19.9%
Other10.6%
District 11.2% · CA 9.0%
Black0.7%
District 0.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 70.4% (7pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$63K · CA $85K
Median home value$352K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+19% · CA 35%
ZIP population12,592
Median age47 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 405 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 13% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Mountain Vista Middle a good middle school?

Mountain Vista Middle has a Scope Score of 30 out of 100, placing it in the 23rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,731 statewide. 2.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Mountain Vista Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 15.5% of students at Mountain Vista Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 2.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 13.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 2.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 797 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Mountain Vista Middle rank in California?

Mountain Vista Middle ranks #1,731 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 23rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Mountain Vista Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Mountain Vista Middle increases by 2.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Mountain Vista Middle?

6.8% of students at Mountain Vista Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 7.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Mountain Vista Middle compare to other schools in Kelseyville?

Mountain Vista Middle scores 30/100 (23rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 405 students. Use the schools in Kelseyville page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Mountain Vista Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Mountain Vista Middle in Kelseyville, 15.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 19.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mountain Vista Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 290 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
2.4%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 34th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+2.3pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
15.5%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 31th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
6.8%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 66th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
7.5%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 35th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61421%17%25%57%18%−29
Grade 71197%13%23%58%19%−28
Grade 81373%23%31%43%26%−21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61431%8%26%66%8%−27
Grade 71183%14%26%57%17%−17
Grade 81380%5%29%66%5%−27
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111371%12%66%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged29015.9%−3−22
Hispanic/Latino20417.8%−2−21
White15121.2%−7−41
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Mountain Vista Middle ←302.4%15.5%+2.37.5%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019229#18175.4%24.7%16.5%14.2%-8.0pp
20222417#18031.9%16.8%6.5%11.5%+2.2pp
20233123#16871.7%12.3%9.4%10.5%+8.5pp
20242212#19462.1%11.8%7.4%6.2%-3.4pp
20253023#17312.4%15.5%6.8%7.5%+2.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 22 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female20.4%5.7%-14.7pp
Male13.2%7.0%-6.2pp
Hispanic/Latino15.5%5.6%-9.9pp
American Indian/Alaska Native46.2%8.3%-37.9pp
Two or More Races22.2%3.8%-18.4pp
Students with Disabilities18.5%13.8%-4.7pp
English Learners6.7%5.6%-1.1pp
Homeless28.9%7.7%-21.2pp
Military-Connected2.9%0.0%-2.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.4%8.5%-8.9pp
All Students16.6%6.3%-10.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction