ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Monte Bella Elementary · Salinas

Monte Bella Elementary: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Monte Bella posts 35.5% meeting the standard — versus 42.7% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

1300 Tuscany Boulevard, 93905 (opens in new tab)·Alisal Union·Salinas·Grades TK-6·812 students·86% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(831) 753-5700·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded14%21%
% Met+35%43%
Growth+0.7-2.9
Absence16.9%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%
Scope Score
47
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #2,180 statewide · #1 of 12 in Alisal Union

Monte Bella Elementary scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 62nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Monte Bella deserves a closer read. The school sits in Salinas, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +0.7pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 27th to the 62nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1900 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 35% of students meet the standard today, above the 30% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%21%34%33%36%
Grade 431%29%23%22%29%
Grade 538%40%38%33%48%
Grade 647%46%41%56%41%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 340%25%30%31%43%
Grade 423%23%15%27%24%
Grade 518%25%24%16%32%
Grade 625%29%28%48%29%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

18%
17%
65%
Grade 3 · 35% proficient
9%
21%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
21%
27%
52%
Grade 5 · 48% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.0pp across grades; the floor rises 12.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.4%
State 21.3%
6.9pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+0.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
35.5%
State 42.7%
7.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.9%
State 17.9%
1.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.3%
State 1.6%
1.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
5.3%
State 18.0%
12.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Monte Bella Elementary in Salinas, 36.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Monte Bella Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 406 students tested.

All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 43%35%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 25%, state 32%34% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 32%, district 24%, state 32%32% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 36%, district 27%, state 42%36% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 35%, district 23%, state 44%35% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 14%, district 10%, state 11%14% · −21 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 31%, district 20%, state 22%31% · −4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 11%, district 9%, state 15%11% · −24 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 11.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.9%, district 16.2%, state 17.9%16.9% · −1.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (31.3% vs 13.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.1%
TK/K31.3%

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 25:126:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience6.9 years
Fully credentialed87%
First-year teachers13%
Intern / emergency permit6.0%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$57,111 – $129,403
Principal salary$159,412 – $0
Superintendent salary$262,993

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,209, CA average $14,815$20,209 · spent at this school
Federal share$189 per student

$189 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,712 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support15%
Student services9%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance7%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,439 per pupil
2019$12,682 per pupil
2018$12,215 per pupil
2017$11,870 per pupil
2016$11,253 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic96.7%
District 97.4% · CA 56.1%
Other2.7%
District 1.5% · CA 9.0%
White0.6%
District 0.8% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 86.2% (22pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$80K · CA $85K
Median home value$616K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+7% · CA 35%
ZIP population63,898
Median age29 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 812 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Monte Bella Elementary a good elementary school?

Monte Bella Elementary has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 62nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,180 statewide. 14.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Monte Bella Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.5% of students at Monte Bella Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 676 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Monte Bella Elementary rank in California?

Monte Bella Elementary ranks #2,180 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 62nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Monte Bella Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Monte Bella Elementary increases by 0.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Monte Bella Elementary?

16.9% of students at Monte Bella Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Monte Bella Elementary compare to other schools in Salinas?

Monte Bella Elementary scores 47/100 (62nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 812 students. Use the schools in Salinas page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Monte Bella Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Monte Bella Elementary in Salinas, 36.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Monte Bella Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 406 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.4%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 43th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+0.7pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 71th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
35.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 61th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
5.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 33th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310418%17%26%38%36%−8
Grade 41129%21%20%51%29%−15
Grade 512221%27%24%28%48%+0
Grade 612610%31%36%23%41%−5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310413%31%22%35%43%−2
Grade 411212%13%39%37%24%−17
Grade 512214%18%39%30%32%−3
Grade 612611%17%39%33%29%−6
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111215%18%56%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged40636.0%+9−2
Hispanic/Latino44837.5%+9−1
English Learners18213.7%+4+3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Monte Bella Elementary ←4714.4%35.5%+0.70.3%
Dr. Oscar F. Loya Elementary0.5 mi437.3%26.9%+15.80.8%
Jesse G. Sanchez Elementary1.3 mi427.6%23.6%+6.11.6%
New Republic Elementary2.8 mi409.7%28.9%+25.40.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193427#403110.0%29.9%8.9%1.5%-7.3pp
20223649#29048.7%27.2%34.0%1.3%+9.7pp
20233847#301810.0%27.5%25.9%0.5%-0.6pp
20244044#320611.3%26.9%17.1%0.5%-8.4pp
20254762#218014.4%35.5%16.9%0.3%+0.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.4%16.6%+7.2pp
Male8.3%17.0%+8.7pp
Hispanic/Latino9.1%17.0%+7.9pp
Students with Disabilities14.1%14.0%-0.1pp
English Learners8.6%15.4%+6.8pp
Homeless8.5%15.0%+6.5pp
Military-Connected8.6%12.7%+4.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.2%17.6%+8.4pp
All Students8.9%16.8%+7.9pp
White7.1%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction