School district · Monterey County

Alisal Union schools

Alisal Union runs schools through 6th grade. Its 12 public elementary schools run from the 15th to the 54th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). Middle and high school are run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 12 schools

from 15th to 54th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Monte Bella Elementary: 54th percentile, Solid
  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Academy: 47th percentile, Developing
  • Cesar E. Chavez Elementary: 33rd percentile, Developing
  • Creekside Elementary: 32nd percentile, Developing
  • Virginia Rocca Barton Elementary: 29th percentile, Developing
  • Jesse G. Sanchez Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
  • Frank Paul Elementary: 26th percentile, Developing
  • Alisal Community: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • Dr. Oscar F. Loya Elementary: 21st percentile, Needs Support
  • John E. Steinbeck Elementary: 17th percentile, Needs Support
  • Fremont Elementary: 15th percentile, Needs Support
  • Bardin Elementary: 15th percentile, Needs Support
5Needs Support
6Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Schools around Alisal Union

12 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Alisal Union score highest?

Monte Bella Elementary is highest, at the 54th percentile.

That’s higher than 54 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Alisal Union

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 9 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Alisal Union had 15 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

The district

Where does Alisal Union’s money go, and what does it plan?

Alisal Union spent $22,712 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Alisal Union dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction66%
  • Instruction support14%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration4%
  • Buildings & maintenance7%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$39.6 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 59 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 21% of its $191.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 197 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 8%, and the three largest, Lower Class Sizes in TK-3rd grade, District Performing Arts/Community and Family Resource Centers, take 20% between them. The plan itself puts 80% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

11 of the plan’s 59 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $2.3 million
  • Math $0.3 million
  • Catch-up help $0.2 million
  • English learners $3.0 million

Largest of these

  • Ed Services Reading Support$2.1 million
  • Bilingual Teacher Stipend$830,745
  • Enhanced Educational Experiences for EL, FY,and SED Students with IEPs$753,583
What changed and what its goals measure
What changed

The total is $720,539 (2%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is District Performing Arts/​Community, which went from $749,142 to $2.6 million.

Largest cuts

  • Additional support staff for all TK and kindergarten program−⁠$905,024
  • Social Workers (New Action: One additional Social Worker Hired for Bardin Elementary) (Red Indicator)−⁠$750,742
  • Preschool Support Program−⁠$701,628

Largest increases

  • District Performing Arts/​Community+⁠$1.8 million
  • Technology Support+⁠$577,702
  • Family Resource Centers+⁠$409,543

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Site Discretionary Funds to support students in addressing social-emotional learning and behavior$803,375
  • Enhanced Educational Experiences for EL, FY,and SED Students with IEPs$753,583
  • Leadership Development$440,598

Ask: What did Additional support staff for all TK and kindergarten program pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $905,024 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2, 3 and 529%32%up 3 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 222%23%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 316 in 10015 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 31.1%1.1%no change

Goal 4 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Lower Class Sizes in TK-3rd grade · $3,270,757
  • District Performing Arts/​Community · $2,596,555
  • Family Resource Centers · $2,234,617
The full plan5 goals, 32 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($39.6 million).

Where does the money go?

34% to Goal 3. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G3
G4
G5

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Goal 1- Alisal will implement a structured Professional Learning Community (PLC) model to provide all…$13.4 million34% of action budgets

“Goal 1- Alisal will implement a structured Professional Learning Community (PLC) model to provide all students a rigorous academic program. This program will be aligned to the state standards and best practices based on the Multi Tiered System of Support (MTSS) with a focus on Tier 1 an academic instruction to eliminate inequities that limit student success” p. 17 ↗

17 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $16.0 million (−⁠$2.7 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Lower Class Sizes in TK-3rd grade$3.3 millionaction 1.15 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Additional support staff for all TK and kindergarten program$2.2 millionaction 1.11 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Professional Learning Community Release Program$2.0 millionaction 1.1 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.6 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Instructional Coaches (Red Indicator)$1.2 millionaction 1.9 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Bilingual Teacher Stipend$0.8 millionaction 1.14 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

12 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional Development for Certificated Staff (Red Indicator) · action 1.7 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $446,624 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Science Camp · action 1.13 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Leadership Development · action 1.6 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Curriculum and Instruction Support · action 1.10 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • IReady; Assessment System (New Action) · action 1.5 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Math Professional Development and Support (Red Indicator) · action 1.8 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $203,752 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Independent Reading Support AR · action 1.4 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Database Coordinator for unduplicated pupils · action 1.16 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Student Tutoring · action 1.18 · p. 147 ↗$0.2 million
  • Additional Learning Opportunities for Students-Field Trips · action 1.12 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $185,400 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Classroom Learning Environments · action 1.19 · p. 147 ↗$0.2 million
  • Educational Services Equity Department · action 1.3 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $129,012 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Additional support staff for all TK and kindergarten program−⁠$0.9 million$3.1 million → $2.2 million · p. 147 ↗
  2. Instructional Coaches (Red Indicator)−⁠$0.3 million$1.5 million → $1.2 million · p. 147 ↗
  3. Professional Learning Community Release Program−⁠$0.3 million$2.2 million → $2.0 million · p. 146 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Lower Class Sizes in TK-3rd grade · $3.2 million → $3.3 million · p. 147 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Bilingual Teacher Stipend · $819,167 → $830,745 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$11,578
  • Professional Development for Certificated Staff (Red Indicator) · $874,734 → $801,624 · p. 146 ↗−⁠$73,110
  • Science Camp · $566,570 → $566,570 · p. 147 ↗unchanged
  • Leadership Development · $440,598 · p. 146 ↗new or renamed
  • Curriculum and Instruction Support · $362,982 → $368,637 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$5,655
  • IReady; Assessment System (New Action) · $347,810 → $353,009 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$5,199
  • Math Professional Development and Support (Red Indicator) · $222,840 → $253,752 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$30,912
  • Independent Reading Support AR · $212,167 → $212,995 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$828
  • Database Coordinator for unduplicated pupils · $188,053 → $201,164 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$13,111
  • Student Tutoring · $393,000 → $196,446 · p. 147 ↗−⁠$196,554
  • Additional Learning Opportunities for Students-Field Trips · $202,200 → $195,400 · p. 147 ↗−⁠$6,800
  • Classroom Learning Environments · $105,970 → $160,000 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$54,030
  • Educational Services Equity Department · $136,594 → $139,012 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$2,418

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 2 quoted

  • Documentation of Coaches Impact Cycle p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    1 per year 2023-2024
    Target for year 3
    10 impact cycles in one year
  • All students have access to standards-aligned instructional materials p. 23 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 100%
    Target for year 3
    100%

7 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Goal 2: Success of English Learner Students (student group focus) Alisal will provide intentional (tier)…$1.5 million4% of action budgets

“Goal 2: Success of English Learner Students (student group focus) Alisal will provide intentional (tier) support (s) to English Learners to ensure they develop high levels of language in their program of instruction to succeed across all content areas” p. 46 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.4 million (+⁠$97,933)

Largest funded actions

  1. Instructional EL Specialist to Support English Learners (Red Indicator)$504,432action 2.2 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Long-Term English Language Learners$504,432action 2.5 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Newcomer Program$359,250action 2.1 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Ellevation$119,039action 2.4 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Language Development Support$19,418action 2.3 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional EL Specialist to Support English Learners (Red Indicator)+⁠$27,680$476,752 → $504,432 · p. 148 ↗
  2. Long-Term English Language Learners+⁠$27,680$476,752 → $504,432 · p. 148 ↗
  3. Language Development Support−⁠$24,712$44,130 → $19,418 · p. 148 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Newcomer Program · $341,254 → $359,250 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$17,996
  • Ellevation · $119,039 · p. 148 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 6 measures · 2 quoted

  • Parent Survey: % of parents who know what child needs to accomplish in order to be reclassified p. 47 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 85.6%
    Target for year 3
    100%
  • Degree to which students have standards-aligned instructional materials to include ELD standards per Williams review/report p. 47 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 100%
    Target for year 3
    100%

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Goal 3: Social Emotional Learning, Behavioral Supports and Active Engagement. Alisal will cultivate an…$13.5 million34% of action budgets

“Goal 3: Social Emotional Learning, Behavioral Supports and Active Engagement. Alisal will cultivate an environment through a comprehensive system of support that promotes social-emotional, behavioral, and physical wellness that advances student learning” p. 54 ↗

21 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $12.4 million (+⁠$1.1 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. District Performing Arts/​Community$2.6 millionaction 3.15 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Family Resource Centers$2.2 millionaction 3.6 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Assistant Principals to support MTSS Implementation (Social-emotional, behavior & academic interventions)$2.2 millionaction 3.14 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. School Counselors (Red Indicators)$1.9 millionaction 3.4 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. SPED Staff (Red Indicator)$1.1 millionaction 3.1 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

16 more funded actions in this goal

  • Social Workers (New Action: One additional Social Worker Hired for Bardin Elementary) (Red Indicator) · action 3.7 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $813,329 is state funding counted toward those services$0.9 million
  • Site Discretionary Funds to support students in addressing social-emotional learning and behavior · action 3.16 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • Student Engagement/​Attendance · action 3.21 · p. 150 ↗$0.4 million
  • Pupil Personal Department Director/​Secretary · action 3.8 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Nasa Semma · action 3.11 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Sports Program · action 3.13 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • STEM Robotics · action 3.10 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Easter Seals · action 3.20 · p. 150 ↗$0.2 million
  • District Translator/​Interpreter (New Action) · action 3.17 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts (VAPA) · action 3.12 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Program · action 3.3 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $22,960 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Family and Community Engagement · action 3.18 · p. 150 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Health Services for Students · action 3.5 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $8,696 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Migrant Education Program English Learners-Migrant Students · action 3.9 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Multi Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) · action 3.2 · p. 148 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Independent Study · action 3.19 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. District Performing Arts/​Community+⁠$1.8 million$0.7 million → $2.6 million · p. 149 ↗
  2. Social Workers (New Action: One additional Social Worker Hired for Bardin Elementary) (Red Indicator)−⁠$0.8 million$1.6 million → $0.9 million · p. 149 ↗
  3. SPED Staff (Red Indicator)−⁠$0.7 million$1.8 million → $1.1 million · p. 148 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Family Resource Centers · $1.8 million → $2.2 million · p. 149 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • Assistant Principals to support MTSS Implementation (Social-emotional, behavior & academic interventions) · $2.8 million → $2.2 million · p. 149 ↗−⁠$0.6 million
  • School Counselors (Red Indicators) · $1.8 million → $1.9 million · p. 148 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Site Discretionary Funds to support students in addressing social-emotional learning and behavior · $803,375 · p. 149 ↗new or renamed
  • Student Engagement/​Attendance · $240,000 → $385,000 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$145,000
  • Pupil Personal Department Director/​Secretary · $296,982 → $305,785 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$8,803
  • Nasa Semma · $100,000 → $246,201 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$146,201
  • Sports Program · $257,038 → $197,943 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$59,095
  • STEM Robotics · $175,000 · p. 149 ↗new or renamed
  • Easter Seals · $135,000 → $170,000 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$35,000
  • District Translator/​Interpreter (New Action) · $100,695 → $100,258 · p. 150 ↗−⁠$437
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts (VAPA) · $171,000 → $80,000 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$91,000
  • Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Program · $58,279 → $60,000 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$1,721
  • Family and Community Engagement · $40,000 · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • Health Services for Students · $167,000 → $15,696 · p. 148 ↗−⁠$151,304
  • Migrant Education Program English Learners-Migrant Students · $20,000 → $15,350 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$4,650
  • Multi Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) · $10,000 · p. 148 ↗new or renamed
  • Independent Study · $6,952 → $9,813 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$2,861

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • The students have access and are enrolled in programs and services developed and provided to students with disabilities p. 56 ↗
    Baseline
    12 psychologists, one per site 2023-2024
    Target for year 3
    12 psychologists, one per site

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4Goal 4: Building Capacity for the Recruitment and Retention of High-Quality Staff Alisal will build and…$8.1 million21% of action budgets

“Goal 4: Building Capacity for the Recruitment and Retention of High-Quality Staff Alisal will build and sustain a culture of learning, refine systems that guarantee access to high quality-teaching and learning, and facilitate adult learning focused on continuous improvement towards educational equity and social justice” p. 79 ↗

12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $6.9 million (+⁠$1.2 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Technology Support$2.0 millionaction 4.5 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Recruitment and Retention of Highly Qualified Staff$1.8 millionaction 4.3 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Additional Professional Development Days for Certificated Staff$1.5 millionaction 4.2 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Enhanced Educational Experiences for EL, FY,and SED Students with IEPs$0.8 millionaction 4.1 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Building Capacity for Site and District Leaders (Red indicator)$0.7 millionaction 4.4 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $263,000 is state funding counted toward those services

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • New Teacher Support Services · action 4.7 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Tech TOSA · action 4.8 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Educational Technology · action 4.10 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Educational Technology Teachers · action 4.9 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • College Readiness · action 4.6 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Recruitment & Retention Increase for Certificated Staffing · action 4.12 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Professional Development Days for Special Education Staff to support Dually-Identified Students · action 4.11 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Technology Support+⁠$0.6 million$1.5 million → $2.0 million · p. 150 ↗
  2. Building Capacity for Site and District Leaders (Red indicator)−⁠$0.4 million$1.1 million → $0.7 million · p. 150 ↗
  3. New Teacher Support Services+⁠$208,062$267,170 → $475,232 · p. 150 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Recruitment and Retention of Highly Qualified Staff · $1.7 million → $1.8 million · p. 150 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Additional Professional Development Days for Certificated Staff · $1.4 million → $1.5 million · p. 150 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Enhanced Educational Experiences for EL, FY,and SED Students with IEPs · $753,583 · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • Tech TOSA · $338,192 → $351,796 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$13,604
  • Educational Technology · $388,215 → $266,520 · p. 151 ↗−⁠$121,695
  • Educational Technology Teachers · $158,909 → $165,087 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$6,178
  • College Readiness · $72,000 → $72,000 · p. 150 ↗unchanged
  • Recruitment & Retention Increase for Certificated Staffing · $63,312 · p. 151 ↗new or renamed
  • Professional Development Days for Special Education Staff to support Dually-Identified Students · $50,803 · p. 151 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 4 measures · 1 quoted

  • Students survey about college visit Did this visit change my perspective on wanting to go to college? p. 80 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 0%
    Target for year 3
    90%

3 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5 · Focus GoalGoal 5: Best First Early Literacy Instruction All Alisal students will develop foundational literacy skills…$3.0 million8% of action budgets

“Goal 5: Best First Early Literacy Instruction All Alisal students will develop foundational literacy skills necessary to read at grade level by the end of third grade, aligned to the California Comprehensive State Literacy Plan” p. 92 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.5 million (−⁠$475,458)

Largest funded actions

  1. Ed Services Reading Support$2.1 millionaction 5.4 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Early Learning Program Support Director/​Teacher PLC Support$0.6 millionaction 5.3 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Preschool Support Program$0.3 millionaction 5.1 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Early Learning Professional Development$0.1 millionaction 5.2 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Preschool Support Program−⁠$701,628$954,257 → $252,629 · p. 151 ↗
  2. Ed Services Reading Support+⁠$0.2 million$1.9 million → $2.1 million · p. 151 ↗
  3. Early Learning Program Support Director/​Teacher PLC Support+⁠$73,359$563,881 → $637,240 · p. 151 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Early Learning Professional Development · $118,633 → $93,228 · p. 151 ↗−⁠$25,405

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 92 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 7,303 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 97%2. Filipino: <1%3. White: <1%4. Two or more races: <1%5. Asian: <1%6. Black or African American: <1%7. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino97%
  2. Filipino<1%
  3. White<1%
  4. Two or more races<1%
  5. Asian<1%
  6. Black or African American<1%
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

91%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 6,645 of 7,303 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Alisal Union extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 51% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,603 of 3,145 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Creekside Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (4)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Alisal Union rank highest?

Elementary: Monte Bella Elementary, 54th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California elementary schools we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Alisal Union district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Alisal Union good?

Alisal Union’s 12 public elementary schools run from the 15th to the 54th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 6 Developing and 5 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Alisal Union compare with California?

The average elementary school in Alisal Union had 15 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Alisal Union spend per student?

Alisal Union spent $22,712 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Alisal Union dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Alisal Union’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $39.6 million into 59 funded actions in 5 goals, 21% of its $191.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $13.5 million, 34% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Alisal Union, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.