ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Temecula

MethodSchools: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

MethodSchools posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.5% vs 1.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Scope Score
27
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #4,839 statewide · #5 of 5 in Dehesa Elementary

MethodSchools scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 16th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. MethodSchools deserves a closer read. It sits at the 16th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

As a charter, MethodSchools enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.

The 4 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
9.6%
State 21.3%
11.8pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
34.7%
State 42.7%
8.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.2%
State 17.9%
1.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.5%
State 1.6%
1.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
Elementary
MethodSchools
27
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic40.9%
White42.3%
Asian1.2%
Black7.7%
Other7.9%
GenderFemale 35.8%Male 63.1%Non-binary 1.2%
Resources & Access
Transitional Kindergarten
TK status unconfirmed
No TK enrollment is on file with the state for this school — that isn't the same as “no TK.” Confirm directly with the district.
Per-Pupil Spending
$25,766
CA avg: $14,815 · District avg · NCES F-33
Teacher Salary Range
$52,070 – $113,960
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At MethodSchools in Temecula, 38.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 21.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. MethodSchools outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 109 students tested.
Equity Gaps
ELA · Disabilities−13.8pp
26.7% vs 40.5% overall · n=15
1 more gap by subject
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−5.8pp
6.7% vs 12.5% overall · n=15

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income109 tested
ELA 38.5%·Math 41.3%· +17.2pp vs district
Hispanic123 tested
ELA 41.5%·Math 41.5%· +17.1pp vs district
White92 tested
ELA 42.4%·Math 41.3%· -5.6pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 49%Support 48%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$125K
$40K above CA median
Median Home Value
$646K
$13K below CA median
Bachelor's+
34%
1pp below CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
7.8 years avg experience
31 teachers · 6% first-year · 10% second-year
Teacher Credentials
76% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →
For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
9.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 39th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
34.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 44th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
16.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 53th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.5%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39
Grade 42015%30%30%25%45%+0
Grade 5119%27%27%36%36%−12
Grade 62715%19%33%33%33%−13
Grade 7737%30%32%32%37%−11
Grade 8749%27%28%35%36%−10
Grade 119519%34%27%20%53%+5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39
Grade 4205%25%50%20%30%−12
Grade 5119%18%27%45%27%−8
Grade 62711%19%22%48%30%−5
Grade 77318%22%23%37%40%+6
Grade 87415%14%18%54%28%−4
Grade 119628%24%19%29%52%+29
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1118811%24%49%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10938.5%+17+0
Hispanic/Latino12341.5%+17+3
White9242.4%−6−19
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
MethodSchools ←279.6%34.7%0.5%
Ysabel Barnett Elementary2.7 mi5633.0%61.7%−3.02.3%
Daniel N. Buchanan Elementary3.1 mi5326.0%54.0%+5.02.2%
Elite Academic Academy - Lucerne1.5 mi4918.0%41.1%−6.00.1%
California average4321.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
33%27%'22'23'24'25
2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · rank #2991 → #4535 → #4117 → #4839
What we can't show
  • — Growth data isn't available — the state needs matched grades across years to compute it.
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

Frequently asked questions

Is MethodSchools a good elementary school?
MethodSchools has a Scope Score of 27 out of 100, placing it in the 16th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,839 statewide. 9.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are MethodSchools's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.7% of students at MethodSchools met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 9.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 9.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 62 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does MethodSchools rank in California?
MethodSchools ranks #4,839 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 16th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at MethodSchools?
16.2% of students at MethodSchools are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does MethodSchools compare to other schools in Temecula?
MethodSchools scores 27/100 (16th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Temecula page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does MethodSchools serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At MethodSchools in Temecula, 38.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 21.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. MethodSchools outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 109 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.