Empire Springs Charter: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Empire Springs Charter posts 32% meeting the standard and 13.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
Empire Springs Charter scores 39 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 46th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Empire Springs Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Temecula, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 5.2% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
As a charter, Empire Springs Charter enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.1pp across grades; the floor rises 11.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 54
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 45
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -3.6pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 141 | 19% | 13% | 23% | 45% | 33% | −11 |
| Grade 4 | 126 | 17% | 21% | 23% | 40% | 37% | −8 |
| Grade 5 | 123 | 17% | 27% | 20% | 36% | 44% | −4 |
| Grade 6 | 174 | 10% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 40% | −7 |
| Grade 7 | 190 | 20% | 35% | 22% | 24% | 55% | +7 |
| Grade 8 | 189 | 17% | 33% | 27% | 23% | 50% | +4 |
| Grade 11 | 100 | 27% | 34% | 22% | 17% | 61% | +14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 141 | 12% | 21% | 21% | 46% | 33% | −12 |
| Grade 4 | 125 | 9% | 16% | 38% | 38% | 25% | −17 |
| Grade 5 | 122 | 7% | 14% | 24% | 55% | 21% | −14 |
| Grade 6 | 174 | 15% | 18% | 24% | 43% | 33% | −2 |
| Grade 7 | 189 | 24% | 16% | 20% | 40% | 40% | +6 |
| Grade 8 | 188 | 18% | 12% | 24% | 46% | 30% | −2 |
| Grade 11 | 100 | 14% | 20% | 23% | 43% | 34% | +11 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 420 | 9% | 25% | 51% | 15% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 602 | 36.7% | +7 | −2 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 550 | 41.8% | +8 | +3 |
| White | 314 | 49.0% | +5 | −13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empire Springs Charter ← | — | 39 | 13.5% | 32.2% | −0.4 | 0.1% |
| Ysabel Barnett Elementary | 2.1 mi | 56 | 33.0% | 61.7% | −3.0 | 2.3% |
| Daniel N. Buchanan Elementary | 2.6 mi | 53 | 26.0% | 54.0% | +5.0 | 2.2% |
| Temecula International Academy | 3 mi | 53 | 28.6% | 59.2% | +22.3 | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 43 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means