Matthew Turner Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Matthew Turner posts 73% meeting the standard, and 42.9% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 68 | 43% | 73% | -5.7 | 6.9% | 0.9% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Matthew Turner Elementary scores 68 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 90th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “73% proficient” and call it done. Matthew Turner deserves a closer read. It sits at the 90th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: 6.9% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 90th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 73% of students meet the standard today, above the 67% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 65% | 59% | 66% | 75% | 73% |
| Grade 4 | 66% | 66% | 62% | 64% | 78% |
| Grade 5 | 72% | 66% | 61% | 66% | 75% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 62% | 67% | 69% | 80% | 76% |
| Grade 4 | 64% | 66% | 73% | 69% | 73% |
| Grade 5 | 72% | 64% | 69% | 57% | 63% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 4.7pp across grades; the floor rises 1.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Matthew Turner Elementary in Benicia, 69.9% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 57.2% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Matthew Turner Elementary outperforms its district average for white students by 12.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (66.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (70.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.6 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 93 students tested.
6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (11.2% vs 4.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
What gets spent here
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 55% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Matthew Turner Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Matthew Turner Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Matthew Turner Elementary rank in California?
Is Matthew Turner Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Matthew Turner Elementary?
How does Matthew Turner Elementary compare to other schools in Benicia?
How does Matthew Turner Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 54
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 78 | 49% | 24% | 17% | 10% | 73% | +30 |
| Grade 4 | 93 | 49% | 29% | 17% | 4% | 78% | +34 |
| Grade 5 | 75 | 44% | 31% | 15% | 11% | 75% | +27 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 78 | 46% | 29% | 21% | 4% | 76% | +30 |
| Grade 4 | 93 | 35% | 38% | 19% | 8% | 73% | +32 |
| Grade 5 | 75 | 33% | 29% | 20% | 17% | 63% | +27 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 75 | 25% | 29% | 44% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 93 | 69.9% | +13 | +8 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 55 | 70.9% | +23 | +32 |
| Two or More Races | 50 | 82.0% | +22 | +21 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Turner Elementary ← | — | 68 | 42.9% | 73.0% | −5.7 | 0.9% |
| Joe Henderson Elementary | 0.6 mi | 58 | 33.7% | 61.2% | −7.6 | 0.1% |
| Mary Farmar Elementary | 1.7 mi | 54 | 23.6% | 55.5% | −3.2 | 1.0% |
| Robert Semple Elementary | 1.9 mi | 50 | 24.9% | 56.1% | −13.5 | 2.0% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 67 | 88 | #653 | 41.1% | 66.8% | 7.1% | 0.2% | +8.3pp |
| 2022 | 56 | 83 | #957 | 33.5% | 64.7% | 14.1% | 0.8% | +1.7pp |
| 2023 | 64 | 88 | #681 | 38.2% | 66.8% | 15.3% | 0.6% | -2.1pp |
| 2024 | 62 | 84 | #892 | 35.8% | 68.4% | 10.1% | 2.5% | -16.0pp |
| 2025 | 68 | 90 | #575 | 42.9% | 73.0% | 6.9% | 0.9% | -5.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6.1% | 6.4% | +0.3pp |
| Male | 8.0% | 5.9% | -2.1pp |
| Asian | 7.4% | 3.6% | -3.8pp |
| Black/African American | 11.1% | 17.6% | +6.5pp |
| White | 2.0% | 0.0% | -2.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.5% | 11.0% | +2.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 13.3% | 3.6% | -9.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 16.3% | 12.0% | -4.3pp |
| English Learners | 11.5% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 15.8% | 20.3% | +4.5pp |
| All Students | 7.0% | 6.2% | -0.8pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction