Public school with a magnet program · Los Angeles Unified · Los Angeles, California

Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos — Rating & test scores

Los Angeles · 9–12 · 534 students (2024–25)

2530 East 4th Street, 90033mstmaatroosevelt.org ↗(323) 780-6500

Missed LAUSD Choices? Late applications open , and join the end of the waitlist.

Applying for 2027–28. From LAUSD’s Choices brochure ↗.

How to apply ↓

89thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 1,498 scored public high schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. Why not spring 2026? High school scores include graduation and college-readiness records, which the state publishes a year after the tests. How it’s built →

Scope Score
75

Weighted composite · 2024–25
A weighted mix of six of the seven high school measures.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

In 2024–25, 100% of the class graduated in four years (105 of 105); across California, 89%.

Source
Source
CDE four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), 2024–25
Students
students who started 9th grade together: 105
Comparison
California: graduates divided by students who started 9th grade together, across 2,281 public schools’ rows (our combination, not CDE’s published state rate; 432,702 of 487,177).
How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four high schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap

Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos and Theodore Roosevelt Senior High share this address in the state’s school directory. The California School Campus Database maps the grounds as one campus. Which buildings each school uses here isn’t mapped.

The California School Campus Database records Boyle Heights Continuation on this campus too; it gives each school the whole campus, so this drawing doesn’t show which buildings each uses.

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, with building heights from LA County, inside the campus outline from the California School Campus Database (2025). Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

In grade 11, spring 2026, 81% scored Proficient or Advanced in English (reading and writing) and 44% in math, against 57% and 32% across California.

From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).

Sources
The sentence above
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026. All students tested in grade 11: 135. California: CDE’s grade 11 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 414,559 in English and 413,523 in math tested).

Common questions

How do I get in?

On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026 and join the end of the waitlist. Evidence ↓

Is Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos a good high school?

Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos scores higher than 89 in 100 of California’s 1,498 scored public high schools: 89th percentile, Strong, spring 2025. Evidence ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 15 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 28 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified high school. 0 of 545 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 2.9% at the average California high school. Evidence ↓

More questions (6)

How does math compare with English?

In grade 11, spring 2026, math trails English by 37 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 25 points across California. Evidence ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 80% of low-income students in grade 11 at Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos in Los Angeles scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 49% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓

What do families and students say?

85% of families agreed or strongly agreed with “My child is safe on school grounds” (LAUSD high schools 81%, 150 answered).

  • 70% of students agreed or strongly agreed with “I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions” (LAUSD high schools 65%, 519 answered)
  • Source: Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey, 2025–26

Evidence ↓

What could my child study here?

The College Board approved this school to teach 18 AP courses in 6 subjects for 2025–26. Evidence ↓

Where do students go after finishing high school here?

72% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months, by CDE’s college-going records. Evidence ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓

Academic achievement

How did students here do on state tests?

Well above California in both subjects.

State tests (CAASPP), grade 11, spring 2026

In grade 11, spring 2026, 81% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 44% in math, against 57% and 32% across California.

Source
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grade 11: 135
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 11 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 414,559 in English, 413,523 in math tested). The comparisons use the same grade and year.
AdvancedProficientBelow the standard

English

Grade 11 · spring 2026 · 135 tested

Advanced
39%
Proficient
42%
Below the standard
19%
This school81%
California57%
Los Angeles Unified59%

81% Proficient or Advanced in grade 11.

Math

Grade 11 · spring 2026 · 135 tested

Advanced
16%
Proficient
28%
Below the standard
56%
This school44%
California32%
Los Angeles Unified31%

44% Proficient or Advanced in grade 11.

New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →

How does math compare with English?

In grade 11, spring 2026, math trails English by 37 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 25 points across California. The grade 11 cards above give each subject’s share.

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 82% to 81% and math from 45% to 44%.

English · top two levels · grade 11

202582%134 tested
→
202681%135 tested

This school

California, same grades57% → 57%2025 → 2026 · 432,651 → 414,559 tested

Math · top two levels · grade 11

202545%134 tested
→
202644%135 tested

This school

California, same grades30% → 32%2025 → 2026 · 431,903 → 413,523 tested

Each year is a different group of students.

Ask: What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?

All four levelsThe state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal, with tested counts
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grade 11 · This school39%42%16%3%135
English, grade 11 · California27%30%21%22%414,559
English, grade 11 · Los Angeles Unified26%33%21%20%34,143
Math, grade 11 · This school16%28%32%24%135
Math, grade 11 · California16%16%20%48%413,523
Math, grade 11 · Los Angeles Unified14%17%22%47%34,113

Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Grade 11 tests are one part of the picture. Graduation, readiness and college destinations answer different questions below.

Results since 20178 tested years shown · English and math have been above California in every tested year since 2017

Chart and table: 2017–2026.

English top two levels, grade 11
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202681%57%
Math top two levels, grade 11
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202644%32%

The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.

In grade 11, the share at the state’s top two levels in English was 81% in both 2017 and 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. In math, it was 44% in both 2017 and 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.

Each year’s results and tested counts

English · top two levels · grade 11
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201781%
98 tested		60%
444,040 tested
201878%
107 tested		56%
439,134 tested
201986%
132 tested		57%
439,947 tested
202271%
139 tested		55%
427,007 tested
202376%
128 tested		55%
442,128 tested
202472%
112 tested		56%
435,296 tested
202582%
134 tested		57%
432,651 tested
202681%
135 tested		57%
414,559 tested
Math · top two levels · grade 11
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201744%
97 tested		32%
442,457 tested
201840%
107 tested		31%
437,883 tested
201949%
132 tested		32%
438,107 tested
202236%
139 tested		27%
424,390 tested
202333%
127 tested		27%
440,912 tested
202443%
113 tested		28%
434,711 tested
202545%
134 tested		30%
431,903 tested
202644%
135 tested		32%
413,523 tested

Life at school

How many students here graduate, and where do they go next?

100% of students graduated in four years in 2024–25.

State graduation, readiness, college-going, attendance and suspension records

That compares with 89% across California. 85% were ready for college or career (state measure) in 2024–25. 72% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months.

Preparation · each measure describes a different student group

Graduated in four years

100%

Across California: 89%

2024–25 · 105 of 105 students who started 9th grade together

Ready for college or career (state measure)

85%

Across California: 52%

2024–25 · 89 of 105 students in the state’s measure

Finished the UC/CSU course list

83%

Average California high school: 56%

2024–25 · 87 of 105 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list

Destinations · class of 2023

Where students who finished high school went

72% enrolled in college within 12 months · 140 students who finished high school

  • University of California UC detail ↓31 · 22%
  • California State University43 · 31%
  • California community college22 · 16%
  • In-state private2 · 1%
  • Out-of-state, 4-year3 · 2%
  • Out-of-state, 2-year0 · 0%
  • Not enrolled39 · 28%

Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: each count divided by all high-school completers (graduates and other students who finished), rounded together so they total 100. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.

What could my child study here?

AP courses the school is approved to teach

The College Board approved this school to teach 18 AP courses in 6 subjects for 2025–26.

College Board AP Course Audit Ledger · 2025–26. Authorization doesn’t show which courses run or who can take them; ask the school.

  • Math & Computer Science5
  • Sciences3
  • English2
  • History & Social Science5
  • World Languages & Cultures1
  • AP Capstone2
Every approved AP course18 courses in 6 subjects
Math & Computer Science 5
  • Calculus AB
  • Calculus BC
  • Computer Science Principles
  • Precalculus
  • Statistics
Sciences 3
  • Biology
  • Chemistry
  • Environmental Science
English 2
  • English Language and Composition
  • English Literature and Composition
History & Social Science 5
  • African American Studies
  • Psychology
  • U.S. Government and Politics
  • United States History
  • World History: Modern
World Languages & Cultures 1
  • Spanish Language and Culture
AP Capstone 2
  • Research
  • Seminar

Ask: How does the school help students who don’t go to college plan what comes next?

Where these figures come fromEach measure’s source, student group and definition
Graduated in four years
2024–25 · 105 of 105 students who started 9th grade together. California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.
Ready for college or career (state measure)
2024–25 · 89 of 105 students in the state’s measure. California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator (CCI), overall “Prepared” rate, among the students in the indicator’s group. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.
Finished the UC/CSU course list
2024–25 · 87 of 105 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list. California Department of Education, A–G completion records (graduates who met the UC/CSU course requirements). Course completion is separate from college enrollment.
Where students who finished high school went
CDE college-going records, class of 2023. College enrollment is counted for 12 months after finishing high school and matched to college records, so this runs about two years behind. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
A closer look: UC admission recordsApplied, admitted and enrolled, from each university system’s own records

UC’s own records

University of California

Fall 2025 first-year entry · counts, not a school rating

Applied
47
Admitted
45
Enrolled
21

By campus · fall 2025

  • UC MercedApplied 37 · Admitted 37 · Enrolled under 3
  • UC RiversideApplied 37 · Admitted 34 · Enrolled 4
  • UC IrvineApplied 32 · Admitted 10 · Enrolled under 3
  • UCLAApplied 29 · Admitted 4 · Enrolled 3
  • UC Santa BarbaraApplied 28 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled under 3
  • UC BerkeleyApplied 20 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled 5
  • UC San DiegoApplied 19 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled under 3
  • UC Santa CruzApplied 19 · Admitted 9 · Enrolled under 3
  • UC DavisApplied 13 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled 3

These records don’t show the school’s effect on admission. A student can apply to several campuses, so campus counts don’t add up to the total. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees; “+” marks a partial count; a dash is unavailable. Source: UC admissions by source school.

Each fall since 2016

  • Fall 2025Applied 47 · Admitted 45 · Enrolled 21
  • Fall 2024Applied 64 · Admitted 52 · Enrolled 18
  • Fall 2023Applied 71 · Admitted 60 · Enrolled 32
  • Fall 2022Applied 51 · Admitted 38 · Enrolled 12
  • Fall 2021Applied 54 · Admitted 44 · Enrolled 22
  • Fall 2020Applied 61 · Admitted 46 · Enrolled 16
  • Fall 2019Applied 46 · Admitted 35 · Enrolled 23
  • Fall 2018Applied 42 · Admitted 28 · Enrolled 16
  • Fall 2017Applied 45 · Admitted 27 · Enrolled 15
  • Fall 2016Applied 31 · Admitted 21 · Enrolled 8

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

15 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26. That means they missed 10% or more of school days. At the average Los Angeles Unified high school, 28 in 100 were. 0 of 545 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 2.9% at the average California high school.

Source
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism and suspension files, 2025–26
Students
chronic absence: 81 of 534 students counted for it; suspension: 0 of 545 students enrolled during the year
Comparison
Each comparison is the rate at the average school (our average of school rates), not a pooled rate. Also: suspensions at the average Los Angeles Unified high school 0.7%.

Chronically absent, 2025–26

15 in 100This school
28 in 100At the average Los Angeles Unified high school
22 in 100At the average California high school

81 of 534 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.

Suspensions, 2025–26

0 of 545

students were suspended at least once. Average California high school 2.9%.

Ask: How does this educational approach show up in daily lessons?

How does the school describe its days?

Quoted or closely paraphrased from mstmaatroosevelt.org, read October 18, 2026. This is the school’s own account: not a review or a test result, and not checked against records.

“In collaboration with families and community, our students experience an interdisciplinary and Social Justice oriented-Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math magnet program that is infused with Humanities courses to develop cultural awareness and social emotional skills so students can flourish in their college, career and post-secondary life.”

mstmaatroosevelt.org (opens in a new tab), read October 18, 2026

Values & educational approach

The school's mission is to provide an interdisciplinary and Social Justice oriented STEM magnet program infused with Humanities courses to develop cultural awareness and social emotional skills so students can flourish in their college, career and post-secondary life.

The school’s page on values & educational approach (opens in a new tab), read October 18, 2026

What people say

What do students, families and staff say?

On safety, students, families and staff here all answered more positively than at LAUSD high schools in 2025–26.

LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26

This schoolLAUSD high schools, same questionsEach bar 0–100%

Students

519 of 519 students answered (100%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question70%LAUSD high 65% · 519 answered
Belonging · average of 6 questions67%LAUSD high 61% · 506–514 answered each
Caring adults · average of 8 questions70%LAUSD high 61% · 504–517 answered each
Engagement · average of 6 questions68%LAUSD high 61% · 507–511 answered each
High expectations · average of 3 questions74%LAUSD high 68% · 510–512 answered each
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days · average of 5 questions10%LAUSD high 10% · 513–516 answered eachShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.
All 46 student questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD high schools
QuestionHereLAUSD high schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed70%65%519
Belonging
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed74%65%507
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed73%64%514
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed65%59%508
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed71%66%506
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed49%46%513
LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are acceptedShare who agreed or strongly agreed69%63%514
Caring adults
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed69%62%512
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed70%60%509
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed56%54%504
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed70%59%517
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed70%59%512
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%68%508
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed71%61%507
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%66%511
Engagement
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%73%507
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed55%48%510
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed60%53%510
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed72%64%511
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%74%509
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed65%53%511
High expectations
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%71%512
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%70%510
Adults at this school have helped me learn the details of getting into college (completing applications, financial aid, etc)Share who agreed or strongly agreed70%63%511
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it13%15%516
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it13%15%516
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it5%6%513
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it4%6%514
Had sexual jokes, comments, or gestures made to you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it13%10%514
Other questions
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed69%61%510
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed62%54%514
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed72%69%513
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?The survey file we hold gives no share for this question, so none is shown——424
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”79%72%511
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”78%73%511
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”77%72%510
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed51%57%513
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”50%48%505
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”48%44%504
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”60%54%506
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”80%76%513
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”85%81%509
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”66%67%513
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”76%69%516
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”78%74%515
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”84%79%516

Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Families

156 of 473 family surveys came back (33%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question85%LAUSD high 81% · 150 answered
Belonging · average of 4 questions91%LAUSD high 87% · 151–156 answered each
Caring adults · average of 2 questions86%LAUSD high 86% · 153–155 answered each
Engagement · average of 3 questions88%LAUSD high 83% · 155 answered
High expectations · average of 2 questions94%LAUSD high 89% · 146–147 answered each
Bullying reports taken seriously · 1 question76%LAUSD high 78% · 153 answered
All 40 family questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD high schools
QuestionHereLAUSD high schoolsAnswers
Safety
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%81%150
Belonging
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%87%155
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%88%155
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%86%151
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%87%156
Caring adults
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%85%155
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%86%153
Engagement
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%86%155
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%83%155
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%80%155
High expectations
School staff expect my child to attend collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%87%147
School staff expect my child to graduate from high schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%90%146
Bullying reports taken seriously
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%78%153
Other questions
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%84%155
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%83%154
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%84%153
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%82%154
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%85%154
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%84%155
School staff help me understand the requirements for CSU/UC admissionShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%81%144
School staff help me understand which courses my child needs to graduate from high schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%86%145
School staff help me understand how to apply for financial aid for collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%85%30
School staff help me understand how to help my child apply for collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%85%31
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%84%154
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%86%155
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%86%152
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%86%153
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%80%153
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%88%155
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%84%153
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%89%155
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%83%134
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%87%150
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%83%150
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%82%155
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%86%155
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed79%78%138
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%80%118
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%89%154
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%77%154

Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Staff

35 of 41 staff answered (85%), 22 of them teachers · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question97%LAUSD high 93% · 34 answeredShare giving one of the two most positive answers.
Caring adults · average of 2 questions78%LAUSD high 83% · 34–35 answered each
High expectations · average of 2 questions90%LAUSD high 90% · 34 answered
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem · 1 question82%LAUSD high 81% · 33 answeredShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem.
All 46 staff questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD high schools
QuestionHereLAUSD high schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayShare giving one of the two most positive answers97%93%34
Caring adults
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%77%35
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed79%88%34
High expectations
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%88%34
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%92%34
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem82%81%33
Other questions
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed59%78%34
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed59%82%34
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed71%77%34
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%92%34
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolShare giving one of the two most positive answers85%84%33
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed94%84%35
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed69%77%35
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed63%71%35
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”88%84%34
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”70%73%33
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%78%34
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed65%71%34
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed62%66%34
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem88%87%33
The curriculum at this school is focused on helping students get ready for college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%81%21
Teachers expect most students in this school to go to college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%81%21
Teachers in this school feel that it is a part of their job to prepare students academically to succeed in college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%87%21
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—68%10
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year”——10
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—50%9
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—60%9
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—65%9
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—76%9
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”5%17%21
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”14%28%21
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”25%35%20
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”14%27%21
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”29%40%21
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed48%76%21
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed52%76%21
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed86%92%21
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed80%91%20
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed52%61%21
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed43%60%21
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed33%57%21
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed52%60%21
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed71%67%21
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed52%68%21
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed48%62%21
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed76%86%21

“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Know this school? Add your answers

Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos works for your family.

Answer the family questionsResponder en español

Work here? Answer 8 questions about Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos as a workplace, with your Los Angeles Unified work email.

Answer the staff questions

Ask: Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?

About the survey and these figuresWho answers, what we show, and how a theme figure is made

Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades.

LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group only when at least 10% of it responded, so the answers speak for more than the few who chose to reply.

Each row shows the percentage its label describes. For a theme, such as one marked “average of 5 questions”, we average the percentages for its questions, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. Each lane lists every question with its own percentage.

Every learner

How do kids like mine do here?

Hispanic or Latino and low-income students here scored well above the same groups across California.

Student groups, grade 11, spring 2026

Both groups score below California’s rate for all students statewide. 82% of Hispanic or Latino students scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 44% in math (grade 11, spring 2026), against 49% and 21% for the same group across California. Low-income students: 80% in English and 43% in math, against 49% and 23% for the same group across California.

Source
Source
California Department of Education, CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
grade 11; each row gives its tested count. Low-income is CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged”.
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s rows for the whole state combined and weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at RoosSame group, CaliforniaAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students
  • Low-incomeEnglish · 124 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 80%Same group, California 49%
  • Low-incomeMath · 124 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 43%Same group, California 23%
  • Hispanic or LatinoEnglish · 128 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 82%Same group, California 49%
  • Hispanic or LatinoMath · 128 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 44%Same group, California 21%

Proficient or Advanced, grade 11, spring 2026.

Who are the students?

2025–26 · students counted
1. Hispanic or Latino: 95%2. White: 4%Unallocated share: 1%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Hispanic or Latino95%
  2. White4%
  3. Asian—
  4. Black or African American—
  5. Filipino—
  6. Two or more races—
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  8. Pacific Islander—
  9. Not reported—
  10. Unallocated share1%
A dash means the share isn’t available; it isn’t zero. The unallocated share is what’s left after the shares we have; it isn’t a student group. Source and comparisons: the full student mix below.

Who are the families and teachers?

90%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 482 of 534. California: 63%.

29teachers, 2024–25

13 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25

0%in their first year, 2024–25

98%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22

Ask: How does the school keep Hispanic or Latino and low-income students on track as they move up through the grades?

All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrade 11 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Los Angeles Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 124 tested
English80%+2654%+3149%
Math43%+1726%+2023%
Hispanic or Latino · 128 tested
English82%+2953%+3349%
Math44%+1925%+2321%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind across California does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Full student mix, comparisons and sources, 2025–26
Students, 2025–26Here
Hispanic or Latino95%
White4%
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

How the credential rate is counted

CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 98% of teaching positions, 25.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 26.4 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Next steps

Which schools feed into Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos, and how do I get in?

  1. Elementary
    Breed Street Elementary
    56th · Solid · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
  2. Middle
    Hollenbeck Middle
    67th · Solid · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
  3. High · this school
    Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos
    Grades 9–12

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level. Explore schools on the map

Not a next step: the school sharing this address. Theodore Roosevelt Senior High (41st percentile, Developing, among high schools, 2025) has the same street address in the state’s school directory.

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Breed Street Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    56th percentile · Solid · elementary · 2026

  • First Street Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    74th percentile · Solid · elementary · 2026

  • Euclid Avenue Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    73rd percentile · Solid · elementary · 2026

Middle-school links

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

Applying to Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos for 2027–28

  1. If Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos serves your address, you register there without applying. Check which school serves your address first.

    LAUSD Resident School Identifier ↗

  2. On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026 and join the end of the waitlist.

    apply.lausd.net ↗

  3. Magnets select by priority points. A child who isn’t selected is waitlisted only at their first-choice magnet, so list first the one you want most.

  4. Choices letters go out February 8–12, 2027. Accept or decline by March 5, 2027: no answer counts as a decline.

Compare with other schools

How Choices, lotteries and waitlists work

School website: mstmaatroosevelt.org ↗Office: (323) 780-6500Administrator: Elsa Bolado

Location and visiting

Get directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
2530 East 4th Street, Los Angeles 90033

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm which school serves your address with Los Angeles Unified.

Questions for your visit

  1. What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working? 56% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grade 11, spring 2026 (135 students tested); California: 68%
  2. How does the school help students who don’t go to college plan what comes next?
  3. How does this educational approach show up in daily lessons?
  4. Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?
  5. When a bullying report comes in, who handles it, and how is the family told? 10% (the average share reporting being bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days, across 5 survey questions), 2025–26; LAUSD high schools: 10%
  6. Which courses and career pathways does the school run, and who can enroll?

Office (323) 780-65002530 East 4th Street, directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)

Nearby high schoolsClosest first, by straight-line distance

The closest high schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby high schoolsPercentile among California high schools, 2025

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map

Source records

Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2024–25 · ranked #159 of 1,498 California high schools we score · #9 of 191 in Los Angeles Unified
Score factors, 2024–25
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Graduation rate100%6425%
Exceeded standardaverage of English and math32%6722%
Ready for college or career (state measure)85%7520%
Met or exceededaverage of English and math63%7018%
Chronically absent15 in 100615%
Suspension rate0.4% (2 of 538)635%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California high schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2024–25. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 95%: English learners reaching the top level of the state’s English test has no value for this school, so its 5% weight is shared out among the measures above.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2024–25 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

The 2024–25 Scope Score, in the current-formula row below, uses the state’s college-or-career readiness measure, 2024–25. No verified earlier Scope Scores are available here.

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2024–257589#159California high schools · 1,498 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23 and 2023–24 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspension
2018–1910 in 1000.5% (3 of 547)
2021–22not on filenot on file
2022–23not on filenot on file
2023–2414 in 1000 of 526
2024–2515 in 1000.4% (2 of 538)

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Results by gradeEnglish and math · grade 11 · spring 2026 · % of tested students

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
EnglishTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or AdvancedCaliforniaDifference
Grade 1113539%42%16%3%81%57%+24

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
MathTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or AdvancedCaliforniaDifference
Grade 1113516%28%32%24%44%32%+12

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English13539%81%
2026 · Math13516%44%
2025 · English13446%82%
2025 · Math13418%45%
2024 · English11238%72%
2024 · Math11314%43%
2023 · English12827%76%
2023 · Math1279%33%
2022 · English13934%71%
2022 · Math13914%36%
2019 · English13239%86%
2019 · Math13217%49%
2018 · English10742%78%
2018 · Math10717%40%
2017 · English9835%81%
2017 · Math9719%44%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 11 · English13482%
2025 · Grade 11 · Math13445%
2024 · Grade 11 · English11272%
2024 · Grade 11 · Math11343%
2023 · Grade 11 · English12876%
2023 · Grade 11 · Math12733%
2022 · Grade 11 · English13971%
2022 · Grade 11 · Math13936%
2019 · Grade 11 · English13286%
2019 · Grade 11 · Math13249%
2018 · Grade 11 · English10778%
2018 · Grade 11 · Math10740%
2017 · Grade 11 · English9881%
2017 · Grade 11 · Math9744%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide1346%36%57%1%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income12480%+26+31
Hispanic or Latino12882%+29+33
Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 15 in 100 → 2025–26 · 15 in 100 · 0 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0.4% (2 of 538) → 2025–26 · 0 of 545 · −0.4 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female11 in 10013 in 100+2 in 100
Male8 in 10017 in 100+9 in 100
Hispanic or Latino9 in 10015 in 100+6 in 100
Students with disabilities22 in 10022 in 1000 in 100
English learners0 in 100——
Low-income11 in 10015 in 100+4 in 100
All students10 in 10015 in 100+5 in 100
White—17 in 100—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Graduation and readinessstate records · each rate for its own year and class of students
MeasureSource record
This school · CCI overall PreparedCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 85% · numerator 89 students classified Prepared · denominator 105 CCI students.
California · CCI overall PreparedCDE statewide CCI cohort · CCI source year 2025 · all students · overall Prepared rate 52% · numerator 257,567 students classified Prepared · denominator 497,814 CCI students.
AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · AP pathway rate 72% · AP-pathway numerator 64 · denominator 89 (CCI Prepared students). This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.

CDE's overall Prepared rate is the college-readiness factor in the Scope Score (20% of the high school score). The school rate is 89 of 105 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The California figure is CDE's statewide CCI student cohort, not an average of SchoolScope's comparable high schools or the SchoolScope school-rank pool.

Graduation rate
100%
AP route, among those ready for college or career
72%
2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students ready for college or career (CDE’s “Prepared”), not course offerings
Finished the UC/CSU course list (A–G)
83%
A–G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-going rate
72%

These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A–G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.

UC admissions, universitywidefall 2016–2025 · applied, admitted, enrolled, mean GPA · summed across CEEB codes
YearAppliedAdmittedEnrolledMean GPA (applied)Mean GPA (admitted)Mean GPA (enrolled)
20254745213.633.663.79
20246452183.463.593.75
20237160323.603.703.77
20225138123.713.824.05
20215444223.403.543.73
20206146163.453.613.73
20194635233.623.763.70
20184228163.493.603.58
20174527153.373.633.71
2016312183.403.543.46

Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. GPA is each group's mean weighted, capped high-school GPA for 10th/11th-grade college-preparatory courses. SchoolScope leaves GPA unavailable when several CEEB codes contribute rather than combining their means. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees, shown here as “under 5” or “under 3”; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here. Complete, matching counts can support a historical descriptive rate, but do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances. Series shown from 2016.

UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file · each campus counted separately
CampusYearAppliedAdmittedEnrolled
Berkeley20252085
Berkeley202418under 3under 3
Berkeley20233094
Berkeley2022216under 3
Berkeley2021103under 3
Davis20251383
Davis2024196under 3
Davis20232383
Davis2022146under 3
Davis2021204under 3
Irvine20253210under 3
Irvine2024334under 3
Irvine202335under 3under 3
Irvine2022346under 3
Irvine20212953
Los Angeles20252943
Los Angeles2024383under 3
Los Angeles20234354
Los Angeles2022333under 3
Los Angeles2021223under 3
Merced20253737under 3
Merced202425224
Merced202332297
Merced20221818under 3
Merced20213430under 3
Riverside202537344
Riverside20244527under 3
Riverside202340269
Riverside20223624under 3
Riverside2021411911
San Diego2025198under 3
San Diego202423123
San Diego20233513under 3
San Diego202222143
San Diego2021176under 3
Santa Barbara2025288under 3
Santa Barbara20243074
Santa Barbara2023286under 3
Santa Barbara2022276under 3
Santa Barbara2021265under 3
Santa Cruz2025199under 3
Santa Cruz20242913under 3
Santa Cruz202336244
Santa Cruz202226143
Santa Cruz20212414under 3
Universitywide2025474521
Universitywide2024645218
Universitywide2023716032
Universitywide2022513812
Universitywide2021544422

Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. Campus totals are not interchangeable with Universitywide; students can apply to several campuses. Universitywide is separately reported; never derive it by adding campus rows. Universitywide applicant and admit counts are unduplicated. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees, shown here as “under 5” or “under 3”; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here; these records do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances.

AP course catalog2025–26 · College Board course authorizations
SubjectAuthorization recorded for
African American Studiesthis school
Biologythis school
Calculus ABthis school
Calculus BCthis school
Chemistrythis school
Computer Science Principlesthis school
English Language and Compositionthis school
English Literature and Compositionthis school
Environmental Sciencethis school
Precalculusthis school
Psychologythis school
Researchthis school
Seminarthis school
Spanish Language and Culturethis school
Statisticsthis school
U.S. Government and Politicsthis school
United States Historythis school
World History: Modernthis school

Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.

College destinationsclass of 2023 · state college-going records, 12 months after graduation
DestinationCompleters% (derived)
University of California3122%
California State University4331%
California community college2216%
In-state private21%
Out-of-state, 4-year32%
Out-of-state, 2-year00%
Not enrolled3928%

140 students who finished high school, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 72% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ all who finished high school; CDE calls them completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows above.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,180 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$1,010 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 534

Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 534

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 17%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$5,655,379,38451.81%52%
Instruction support$1,791,152,34816.41%17%
Student services$1,344,873,23212.32%12%
Administration$763,652,7807.00%7%
Buildings & maintenance$1,099,649,06210.07%10%
Other$260,356,5952.39%2%
Total$10,915,063,400100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $10,915,063,400 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,180 per pupil
2020$16,355 per pupil
2019$15,793 per pupil
2018$13,247 per pupil
2017$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 90033 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 90033 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$59,652
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)15%
ZIP-area population45,647
Median age32.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 90033 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/math-science-technology-magnet-academy-at-roos-2333"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Academy at Roos — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2024–25 results, compared across 1,498 high schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · UC fall first-year source records — UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or 3 admits or enrollees; “+” marks a partial count; the all-campus total is reported separately · AP courses the College Board approved, 2025–26 (approved to teach, not enrollment) · state college-going records, class of 2023, matched to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyze · Request a correction