ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary · Santa Ana

Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Martin Luther King Jr. posts 16% meeting the standard and 3.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1001 South Graham Lane, 92703 (opens in new tab)·Santa Ana Unified·Santa Ana·Grades TK-5·457 students·97% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 972-6000
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded4%21%
% Met+16%43%
Growth+8.3-2.9
Absence13.4%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
35
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #3,981 statewide · #18 of 38 in Santa Ana Unified

Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 31st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “16% proficient” and call it done. Martin Luther King Jr. deserves a closer read. The school sits in Santa Ana, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 31st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 16% meet the standard today, versus 23% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 315%12%14%10%8%
Grade 432%22%27%24%23%
Grade 521%23%27%24%26%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 313%12%14%14%12%
Grade 436%17%17%16%20%
Grade 519%15%12%14%11%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
92%
Grade 3 · 8% proficient
15%
78%
Grade 4 · 22% proficient
24%
75%
Grade 5 · 25% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 17.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.6%
State 21.3%
17.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+8.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
16.5%
State 42.7%
26.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.4%
State 17.9%
4.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.7%
State 18.0%
2.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary in Santa Ana, 19.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 12.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (18.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 223 students tested.

All students at this school: 17% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 17%, district —, state 43%17%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 17%, district 26%, state 32%17% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 16%, district 26%, state 32%16% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 21%, district 27%, state 42%21% · +4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 8%, district 6%, state 11%8% · −9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 12%, district 28%, state 44%12% · −5 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 18%, district 21%, state 22%18% · +1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: too few students to report‹11
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.4%, district 18.6%, state 17.9%13.4% · −4.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.7% vs 10.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.4%
TK/K16.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 21:119:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience20.7 years
Fully credentialed96%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,919 – $138,788
Principal salary$185,651 – $212,659
Superintendent salary$375,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $32,365, CA average $14,815$32,365 · spent at this school
Federal share$465 per student

$465 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,941 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support14%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,998 per pupil
2019$15,219 per pupil
2018$14,679 per pupil
2017$12,971 per pupil
2016$12,258 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic98.0%
District 95.9% · CA 56.1%
Asian1.3%
District 1.8% · CA 10.2%
White0.2%
District 0.9% · CA 19.9%
Black0.2%
District 0.2% · CA 4.8%
Other0.2%
District 1.1% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 97.4% (34pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$84K · CA $85K
Median home value$619K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+13% · CA 35%
ZIP population62,447
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 8% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary a good elementary school?

Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 31st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,981 statewide. 3.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 17.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 16.5% of students at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 12.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 453 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary rank in California?

Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary ranks #3,981 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 31st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary increases by 8.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary?

13.4% of students at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary compare to other schools in Santa Ana?

Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary scores 35/100 (31st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 457 students. Use the schools in Santa Ana page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary in Santa Ana, 19.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 12.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (18.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 223 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
3.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 33th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+8.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 60th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
16.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 30th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.4%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 48th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3650%8%40%52%8%−36
Grade 4717%15%28%49%23%−22
Grade 5901%24%27%48%26%−22
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3650%12%34%54%12%−33
Grade 4717%13%35%45%20%−22
Grade 5917%4%34%55%11%−24
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11911%7%68%24%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22319.3%−12−19
Hispanic/Latino22218.9%−13−20
English Learners1137.1%+1−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary ←353.6%16.5%+8.30.1%
R. F. Hazard Elementary2.5 mi5427.8%59.0%−0.20.6%
El Sol Santa Ana Science and Arts Academy1.6 mi5316.8%41.0%−3.60.3%
Magnolia Science Academy Santa Ana1.4 mi4830.0%55.5%−36.81.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193737#34836.9%22.7%3.5%0.9%+6.2pp
20223240#34205.8%17.1%30.6%0.0%+6.6pp
20233438#35465.7%18.5%15.7%1.4%+5.3pp
20243840#34575.3%16.7%16.5%1.0%+7.1pp
20253531#39813.6%16.5%13.4%0.1%+8.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 19 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female3.5%13.1%+9.6pp
Male3.2%13.2%+10.0pp
Hispanic/Latino3.4%13.2%+9.8pp
Students with Disabilities2.3%23.9%+21.6pp
English Learners2.5%11.0%+8.5pp
Homeless4.8%10.9%+6.1pp
Military-Connected8.3%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged3.3%12.8%+9.5pp
All Students3.4%13.1%+9.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction