Linda Verde Elementary: Scores climb 13.1 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But the zoned next school scores lower.
Linda Verde holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 43 | 5% | 15% | +13.1 | 14.5% | 0.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Linda Verde Elementary scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 51st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Linda Verde deserves a closer read. The school sits in Lancaster, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +13.1pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 5th to the 51st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2400 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 15% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 26% | 5% | 7% | 9% | 8% |
| Grade 4 | 20% | 15% | 8% | 22% | 8% |
| Grade 5 | 22% | 16% | 17% | 14% | 30% |
| Grade 6 | — | 30% | 19% | 18% | 13% |
| Grade 7 | — | 39% | 30% | 28% | 31% |
| Grade 8 | — | 47% | 24% | 35% | 35% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 19% | 6% | 12% | 7% | 15% |
| Grade 4 | 12% | 12% | 8% | 20% | 11% |
| Grade 5 | 7% | 9% | 10% | 6% | 19% |
| Grade 6 | — | 11% | 16% | 19% | 11% |
| Grade 7 | — | 7% | 27% | 19% | 14% |
| Grade 8 | — | 9% | 10% | 20% | 2% |
The story this school is actually telling
separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
the zoned path continues to Piute Middle, which scores 21 points lower — the data can't say why.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 9.4pp across grades; the floor rises 22.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Linda Verde Elementary in Lancaster, 18.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 22.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Linda Verde Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 325 students tested.
6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +0.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (17.1% vs 10.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to Piute Middle, which scores 21 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$768 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Linda Verde Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Linda Verde Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Linda Verde Elementary rank in California?
Is Linda Verde Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Linda Verde Elementary?
How does Linda Verde Elementary compare to other schools in Lancaster?
How does Linda Verde Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 37
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 3% | 5% | 31% | 61% | 8% | −35 |
| Grade 4 | 73 | 3% | 5% | 21% | 71% | 8% | −37 |
| Grade 5 | 66 | 12% | 18% | 29% | 41% | 30% | −18 |
| Grade 6 | 54 | 2% | 11% | 31% | 56% | 13% | −34 |
| Grade 7 | 55 | 2% | 29% | 35% | 35% | 31% | −17 |
| Grade 8 | 43 | 2% | 33% | 16% | 49% | 35% | −11 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 75 | 1% | 13% | 25% | 60% | 15% | −31 |
| Grade 4 | 74 | 3% | 8% | 36% | 53% | 11% | −31 |
| Grade 5 | 70 | 9% | 10% | 23% | 59% | 19% | −17 |
| Grade 6 | 55 | 4% | 7% | 24% | 65% | 11% | −24 |
| Grade 7 | 56 | 5% | 9% | 32% | 54% | 14% | −20 |
| Grade 8 | 47 | 0% | 2% | 23% | 74% | 2% | −30 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 117 | 2% | 13% | 62% | 23% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 325 | 18.8% | −4 | −19 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 326 | 19.9% | −7 | −19 |
| English Learners | 133 | 3.0% | −1 | −7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Verde Elementary ← | — | 43 | 5.0% | 15.1% | +13.1 | 0.5% |
| Lancaster Alternative and Virtual Academies | 2.2 mi | 47 | 13.3% | 32.2% | +22.1 | 0.2% |
| Lincoln Elementary | 1.5 mi | 33 | 8.6% | 22.6% | −5.0 | 0.6% |
| Discovery | 1.3 mi | 31 | 8.0% | 24.1% | −5.4 | 0.9% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 22 | 5 | #5240 | 5.1% | 17.7% | 22.1% | 1.7% | -7.6pp |
| 2022 | 28 | 28 | #4135 | 2.9% | 10.7% | 46.5% | 2.0% | +7.1pp |
| 2023 | 32 | 32 | #3915 | 2.5% | 10.4% | 29.9% | 0.3% | +4.0pp |
| 2024 | 31 | 21 | #4519 | 3.6% | 13.1% | 22.0% | 0.4% | +2.3pp |
| 2025 | 43 | 51 | #2805 | 5.0% | 15.1% | 14.5% | 0.5% | +13.1pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 19 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 23.3% | 11.6% | -11.7pp |
| Male | 21.3% | 17.3% | -4.0pp |
| Black/African American | 36.6% | 31.0% | -5.6pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.8% | 13.1% | -1.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 38.1% | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | 33.1% | 19.0% | -14.1pp |
| English Learners | 10.8% | 14.3% | +3.5pp |
| Foster Youth | 21.2% | — | — |
| Homeless | 36.8% | 19.6% | -17.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 22.1% | 14.6% | -7.5pp |
| All Students | 22.2% | 14.3% | -7.9pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction