Laurelwoodhigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Laurelwoodhigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Laurelwoodhigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 77% and 76% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 243 in English, 253 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
53%
Proficient
23%
Below Proficient
24%
76% proficient or advanced · 253 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Santa Clara Unified
Advanced
53%
21%
35%
Proficient
23%
21%
22%
Developing
11%
25%
21%
Minimal
13%
33%
22%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–5 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Exceptional.grades 4–5 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–5: 154
Comparison
154 students in grades 4–5 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About half reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
55%English · exceeded the standard53%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 243 in English, 253 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
English learners here (55 tested in English, 65 in math, grades 3–5, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than English learners across California in the same grades (13% and 16%).grades 3–5 · spring 2026
44%English · met or exceeded55%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
English learners in grades 3–5: 55 in English, 65 in math
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 55 students in English and 65 in math.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school77%
California46%
Tested: 243 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school77%
Santa Clara Unified60%
Tested: 243 here · 3,022 in Santa Clara Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 19 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Santa Clara Unified
Advanced
55%
24%
38%
Proficient
22%
22%
22%
Developing
11%
21%
18%
Minimal
12%
33%
22%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school76%
California42%
Tested: 253 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school76%
Santa Clara Unified57%
Tested: 253 here · 3,045 in Santa Clara Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 19 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Santa Clara Unified
Advanced
53%
21%
35%
Proficient
23%
21%
22%
Developing
11%
25%
21%
Minimal
13%
33%
22%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
LaurelwoodCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID77%46%
LaurelwoodCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
LaurelwoodCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID76%42%
LaurelwoodCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 75% in 2017 to 77% in 2026. Math went from 75% in 2017 to 76% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Laurelwood
California
2015
74% 320 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
75% 311 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
75% 299 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
80% 279 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
83% 288 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
80% 236 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
78% 255 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
80% 243 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
81% 237 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
77% 243 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Laurelwood
California
2015
69% 326 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
76% 319 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
75% 301 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
77% 284 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
83% 292 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
83% 237 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
80% 254 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
84% 244 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
76% 253 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
76% 253 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure154 students · grades 4–5 · 2025
English+26ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+31ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 26 points above that prediction, and in math 31 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
14 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
13in 100 at the average Santa Clara Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
86 of 638 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school14 in 100
at the average Santa Clara Unified school13 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
2.0%of students were suspended at least once (13 of 651), 2025–26
0.9%at the average Santa Clara Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–5 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Asian
123 English · 128 math tested
English
83% / 70%
Math
86% / 71%
White
47 English · 48 math tested
English
83% / 60%
Math
90% / 56%
Hispanic or Latino
42 English · 43 math tested
English
55% / 36%
Math
42% / 31%
English learners
55 English · 65 math tested
English
44% / 13%
Math
55% / 16%
Students with disabilities
34 tested per subject · grades 3 and 4
English
32% / 19%
Math
38% / 21%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–5 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Santa Clara Unified
vs California
Asian · 123 tested in English, 128 in math
English
83%
+677%
+1370%
Math
86%
+878%
+1571%
White · 47 tested in English, 48 in math
English
83%
+974%
+2360%
Math
90%
+1575%
+3456%
Hispanic or Latino · 42 tested in English, 43 in math
English
55%
+1738%
■+1936%
Math
42%
+1230%
+1131%
English learners · 55 tested in English, 65 in math
English
44%
+2420%
■+3113%
Math
55%
+3223%
■+3916%
Students with disabilities · 34 tested · grades 3 and 4 only
English
32%
+824%
+1319%
Math
38%
+1424%
■+1721%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Santa Clara Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Low-income students and students of two or more races: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
English learners here did far better than the same group statewide.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Laurelwood Elementary in Santa Clara, 62.5% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grade 4, compared to 40.5% district-wide for those same grades and 34.9% statewide for those same grades. Laurelwood Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 22.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (39.3% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (82.9% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 49.3 percentage points: students with disabilities in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 16 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian54%
2White19%
3Hispanic or Latino15%
4Two or more races6%
5Black or African American2%
6Filipino2%
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share3%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
54%
White
19%
Hispanic or Latino
15%
Two or more races
6%
Black or African American
2%
Filipino
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 10 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (11%, 64 of 571). California: 63%.
96% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 96.41%: 26.8 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 27.8 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Santa Clara Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
Vine Hill ElementaryScotts Valley Unified · 549 enrolled · 11.3% meal eligibility
86thStrongScope Score 61/100
How these schools are matched
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 3.2–19.2% meal eligibility and 286–1,142 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Laurelwood Elementary a good elementary school?
Laurelwood Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 79 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Laurelwood Elementary was well above California in English and math: 77% and 76% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Laurelwood Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 77% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 76% the math standard; 55% and 53% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 243 students were tested in English and 253 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Laurelwood Elementary rank in California?
Laurelwood Elementary is in the 97th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Laurelwood Elementary ranks #162 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Laurelwood Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Laurelwood Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 95th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Laurelwood Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 13.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 86 chronically absent of 638 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 2.0%; 13 unduplicated suspended students of 651 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 13.7%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 2.0%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Laurelwood Elementary compare to other schools in Santa Clara?
Laurelwood Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 571 students. Use the schools in Santa Clara page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Laurelwood Elementary?
At Laurelwood Elementary in Santa Clara, 62.5% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grade 4, compared to 40.5% district-wide for those same grades and 34.9% statewide for those same grades. Laurelwood Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 22.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (39.3% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (82.9% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 49.3 percentage points: students with disabilities in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 16 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 83 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 77 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈95th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.8pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 1.6% · index 47 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
89
45%
20%
19%
16%
65%
+22
Grade 4
78
56%
23%
9%
12%
79%
+35
Grade 5
76
66%
24%
4%
7%
89%
+41
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
95
41%
29%
13%
17%
71%
+25
Grade 4
81
51%
23%
12%
14%
74%
+33
Grade 5
77
71%
14%
6%
8%
86%
+50
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
75
72.0%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
76
93.4%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
86
76.7%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
83
69.9%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
78
87.2%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
92
72.8%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
84
77.4%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
90
81.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
69
82.6%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
84
83.3%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
91
81.3%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
69
88.4%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
93
66.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
79
88.6%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
83
81.9%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
93
74.2%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
79
88.6%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
82
78.0%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
73
69.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
86
84.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
77
84.4%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
75
78.7%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
85
85.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
77
83.1%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
126
76.2%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
77
87.0%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
85
88.2%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
130
83.1%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
74
85.1%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
88
81.8%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
84
78.6%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
96
85.4%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
99
74.8%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
87
73.6%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
96
85.4%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
101
72.3%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
99
72.7%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
108
82.4%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
92
67.4%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
99
76.8%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
110
77.3%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
92
69.6%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
103
67%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
99
77%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
109
82%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
109
73%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
100
72%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
110
84%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
118
69%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
113
75%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
89
78%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
117
62%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
118
71%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
91
76%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
77
49%
29%
16%
6%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
16
62.5%
+22
+28
Asian
123
82.9%
+6
+13
English Learners
55
43.6%
+24
+30
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
82/100
97
#149
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
61.5%
83.6%
6.1%
0.7%
+5.4pp
2022
—
—
—
56.1%
81.1%
11.5%
0.1%
+9.5pp
2023
—
—
—
59.3%
79.7%
16.6%
0.3%
+9.6pp
2024
—
—
—
57.7%
82.4%
14.0%
2.9%
+5.2pp
2025
—
—
—
56.8%
78.7%
15.5%
2.1%
+3.8pp
2026
79
97
#162
55.0%
77.4%
13.7%
2.0%
+19.7pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
5.5%
13.2%
+7.7pp
Male
6.3%
13.7%
+7.4pp
Asian
4.9%
13.5%
+8.6pp
Filipino
—
25.0%
—
Hispanic/Latino
12.7%
25.5%
+12.8pp
Two or More Races
8.1%
7.5%
-0.6pp
White
4.4%
3.3%
-1.1pp
Students with Disabilities
18.4%
23.5%
+5.1pp
English Learners
8.2%
15.3%
+7.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
13.3%
23.5%
+10.2pp
All Students
5.9%
13.5%
+7.6pp
Black/African American
—
33.3%
—
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+26
154
Exceptional
+31
154
Exceptional
Asian
+29
79
Exceptional
+37
79
Exceptional
English Learner
+14
67
Accelerated
+31
67
Exceptional
English Only
+31
59
not categorised
+31
59
not categorised
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+13
48
not categorised
+28
48
not categorised
White
+19
38
Accelerated
+23
38
Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+18
24
Accelerated
+20
24
Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino
+22
20
Exceptional
+31
20
Exceptional
English Learners Only
+15
19
not categorised
+39
19
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
+6
16
Accelerated
+21
16
Exceptional
Two or More Races
+20
12
Exceptional
+13
12
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
50%
exceeded standard · 77% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 84 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
66%
exceeded standard · 89% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 76 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 77 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
154 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +26 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 98th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.98th pctile · +26 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
154 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +31 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 98th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.98th pctile · +31 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$20,344 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 14,808 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$406 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 571
Central federal expenditures attributed here$136 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 571
District current expense · FY 2024–25$32,023 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 62%Instruction support 14%Student services 7%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 9%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95051
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95051
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$196,690
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
70.19%
ZCTA population
62,054
Median age
35.0 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.