ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
La Verne Science and Technology Charter · Pomona

La Verne Science and Technology Charter: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

La Verne Science and Technology Charter posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 0.5pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

250 West La Verne Avenue, 91767 (opens in new tab)·Pomona Unified·Pomona·Grades TK-6·270 students·84% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 397-4684·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2645
% Exceeded10%21%
% Met+24%43%
Growth+0.5-2.9
Absence19.5%17.9%
Suspension0.2%1.6%
Scope Score
26
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,184 statewide · #21 of 25 in Pomona Unified

La Verne Science and Technology Charter scores 26 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 10th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. La Verne Science and Technology Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Pomona, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

As a charter, La Verne Science and Technology Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 42nd to the 10th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 24% meet the standard today, versus 36% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%40%29%44%21%
Grade 439%32%49%38%36%
Grade 545%41%41%41%24%
Grade 615%53%33%40%46%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 335%22%26%25%13%
Grade 426%26%37%32%39%
Grade 531%14%13%8%11%
Grade 615%23%15%17%24%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
79%
Grade 3 · 21% proficient
25%
11%
64%
Grade 4 · 36% proficient
14%
11%
75%
Grade 5 · 25% proficient

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.4%
State 21.3%
10.9pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+0.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
23.9%
State 42.7%
18.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.5%
State 17.9%
1.6pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 1.6%
1.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At La Verne Science and Technology Charter in Pomona, 32.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Verne Science and Technology Charter trails its district average for low-income students by 2.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.8% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 136 students tested.

All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 43%27%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 28%, state 32%27% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 27%, district 28%, state 32%27% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 30%, state 42%30% · +3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 24%, district 32%, state 44%24% · −3 vs school

10 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 5.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.5%, district 24.8%, state 17.9%19.5% · +1.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.2%, district —, state 1.6%0.2% · −1.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (33.3% vs 19.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.1%
TK/K33.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
La Verne Science and Technolog…Charter
26/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 22:118:1
Teaching staff15 teachers
Avg. experience5.7 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers27%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$59,841 – $127,299
Principal salary$150,245 – $167,904
Superintendent salary$297,432

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $729, CA average $14,815$729 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$455 per student

$455 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,467 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support15%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,804 per pupil
2019$14,909 per pupil
2018$15,089 per pupil
2017$14,936 per pupil
2016$13,497 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic77.4%
District 84.4% · CA 56.1%
Black11.5%
District 3.9% · CA 4.8%
Other6.3%
District 3.8% · CA 9.0%
White3.3%
District 3.2% · CA 19.9%
Asian1.5%
District 4.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 84.4% (21pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$79K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+22% · CA 35%
ZIP population49,152
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is La Verne Science and Technology Charter a good elementary school?

La Verne Science and Technology Charter has a Scope Score of 26 out of 100, placing it in the 10th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,184 statewide. 10.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are La Verne Science and Technology Charter's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.9% of students at La Verne Science and Technology Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 13.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 240 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does La Verne Science and Technology Charter rank in California?

La Verne Science and Technology Charter ranks #5,184 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 10th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is La Verne Science and Technology Charter getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at La Verne Science and Technology Charter increases by 0.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at La Verne Science and Technology Charter?

19.5% of students at La Verne Science and Technology Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does La Verne Science and Technology Charter compare to other schools in Pomona?

La Verne Science and Technology Charter scores 26/100 (10th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 270 students. Use the schools in Pomona page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does La Verne Science and Technology Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At La Verne Science and Technology Charter in Pomona, 32.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Verne Science and Technology Charter trails its district average for low-income students by 2.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.8% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 136 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.4%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 39th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+0.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 26th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.9%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 36th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.5%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3385%16%26%53%21%−22
Grade 44425%11%20%43%36%−8
Grade 53714%11%19%57%24%−24
Grade 64117%29%44%10%46%−0
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3393%10%33%54%13%−33
Grade 44414%25%25%36%39%−3
Grade 5383%8%11%79%11%−25
Grade 64110%15%37%39%24%−11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11388%11%45%37%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13632.4%−2−6
Hispanic/Latino11932.8%−2−6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
La Verne Science and Technology Charter ←2610.4%23.9%+0.50.2%
Grace Miller Elementary2 mi7546.3%75.4%+4.80.1%
Sycamore Elementary2.3 mi7552.1%78.9%−7.30.1%
J. Marion Roynon Elementary1.4 mi6341.1%68.4%−2.21.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193942#321213.9%35.6%11.2%2.0%+1.5pp
20222520#457711.5%29.1%44.0%0.5%-3.6pp
20233643#324314.5%32.6%36.7%1.9%-0.6pp
20243222#446910.8%31.3%28.1%1.2%-9.9pp
20252610#518410.4%23.9%19.5%0.2%+0.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.8%15.6%+6.8pp
Male13.0%23.3%+10.3pp
Black/African American5.7%28.2%+22.5pp
Hispanic/Latino10.7%20.4%+9.7pp
Students with Disabilities28.0%39.6%+11.6pp
English Learners13.2%20.4%+7.2pp
Homeless21.7%9.7%-12.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.5%21.7%+10.2pp
All Students11.2%19.7%+8.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction