ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter · Los Angeles

Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter posts 54.8% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

645 North Kenter Avenue, 90049 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Los Angeles·Grades TK-5·453 students·13% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 472-5918·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7745
% Exceeded55%21%
% Met+81%43%
Growth-1.3-2.9
Absence18.4%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
77
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #238 statewide · #16 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter scores 77 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 96th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “81% proficient” and call it done. Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter deserves a closer read. It sits at the 96th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter's low-income kids hit 60.9% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

As a charter, Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 96th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 81% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 387%80%73%78%79%
Grade 476%82%85%82%81%
Grade 591%85%93%83%79%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 390%75%79%91%82%
Grade 478%82%79%87%83%
Grade 579%78%81%77%79%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

45%
34%
21%
Grade 3 · 79% proficient
60%
21%
19%
Grade 4 · 81% proficient
50%
29%
21%
Grade 5 · 79% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 4.8pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
54.8%
State 21.3%
33.5pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-1.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
80.7%
State 42.7%
38.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.4%
State 17.9%
0.5pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter in Los Angeles, 60.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (65.2% Math proficient); White students (80.0% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 23 students tested.

All students at this school: 81% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 81%, district —, state 43%81%
WhiteWhite: this school 81%, district 65%, state 56%81% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 78%, district 42%, state 44%78% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 84%, district 41%, state 42%84% · +3 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 85%, district 56%, state 56%85% · +4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 42%, district 14%, state 15%42% · −38 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 63%, district 36%, state 32%63% · −18 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
English LearnersEnglish Learners: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.4%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%18.4% · +0.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–622.0%
TK/K22.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 20:122:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience15.1 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers19%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,024, CA average $14,815$20,024 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$471 per student

$471 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White49.7%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Other32.7%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic9.1%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Asian7.5%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Black1.1%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 13.3% (51pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$171K · CA $85K
Median home value$2.00M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+80% · CA 35%
ZIP population37,122
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 64% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter a good school?

Yes, by the numbers it's a Strong school — a Scope Score at the 95.86th percentile statewide, with 80.7% of students meeting or exceeding the standard on CAASPP (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). The complication: Students with Disabilities score 38.4 points below the school average, the largest subgroup gap in the record. That's the one thing worth asking about directly if it applies to your child, even as the overall picture is genuinely strong.

Does Kenter Canyon live up to what it says about itself?

Mostly, yes. The school says it aims for students to "achieve their maximum potential" through a rigorous academic program. That claim holds up: 80.7% met or exceeded standard, with 54.8% exceeding it outright (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). It also says it builds "academic and social competencies," and a Gold Level PBIS Implementation Award plus a 0.1% suspension rate line up with a low-exclusion, climate-focused campus [suspension]. Where the language gets tested is the claim that students, all of them, reach their maximum potential. Students with Disabilities score 38.4 points below the school average, the widest gap on record here. Worth asking on a visit: what does the rigorous program look like for a student who needs more support than most?

Does this school work for kids who need extra support?

For most students, the data says clearly yes. For Students with Disabilities specifically, there's a real gap: they score 38.4 points below the school average, the largest subgroup difference in the record (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). That's a fact about outcomes, not a judgment on the students or a sign the school is failing broadly — but it's the single most useful number on this page if that applies to your child. We can't tell from this record which grades or classrooms account for the gap, or what supports are actually in place. That's a direct question to bring to a school visit.

Who is actually teaching my child here?

Teachers average 15.1 years of experience and 100% are fully credentialed [staff] — a veteran, fully qualified staff by those measures. At the same time, 19.1% of teachers are in their first year of teaching, which describes hiring conditions this year, not a verdict on any individual teacher. The record doesn't tell us whether those first-year teachers are spread across grades or concentrated in a few — worth asking which grade your child would be entering.

What does Kenter Canyon spend per student?

$20,024 per student, below the state average of $23,518 [finance]. That gap describes funding, not quality — a school spending less than average isn't thereby weaker, and this school's outcomes are strong despite it. It's context for how the school operates, not a score.

Are some grades stronger than others at Kenter Canyon?

Yes — grade 4 math is the strongest tested grade and subject at 82.9% met or exceeded, and grade 3 ELA is the weakest at 79.0% (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). That's a 1.3-point difference between the two tested grades in this one year, not a trend over time. If your child is entering a specific grade, that's a more useful number than the school-wide average.

What is it like for a student day to day at Kenter Canyon?

Suspensions are rare. The rate is 0.1% [suspension], which points to a calm, low-exclusion campus. Chronic absenteeism, at 18.4% [absence], tells a different part of the story: a meaningful share of students are missing significant school time even though discipline isn't the reason. The record doesn't say whether that's concentrated in particular grades or groups. Worth asking the front office directly.

Where do Kenter Canyon students go after elementary school?

The record lists 6 feeder schools for Kenter Canyon students [feeders]. We don't have the level or quality of those schools on record — just the count — so this tells you where students go next, not how good that destination is. Worth checking directly with the district or the school about which schools its students typically attend.

What we found when we looked closer

Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter is a Strong-band school, sitting at the 95.86th percentile statewide, and the aggregate numbers back that up without much argument: 80.7% of students met or exceeded standard on CAASPP, with 54.8% exceeding it outright. The complicating fact is Students with Disabilities, who score 38.4 points below the school average — the largest subgroup gap in the record, and the thing a parent of a student needing extra support should ask about before enrolling.

The school describes itself as building "a rigorous academic program" toward students achieving "their maximum potential." The overall test data supports that claim directly — an 82.9%-met-or-exceeded showing in grade 4 math, and strong numbers school-wide. The school also frames its mission around social and academic competencies together, and that half checks out too: Kenter Canyon holds a Gold Level PBIS Implementation Award, and suspensions sit at just 0.1% [suspension], consistent with a campus built around keeping kids in class rather than removing them from it.

Where the mission language runs into the data is the word "students," plural and inclusive. The 38.4-point gap for Students with Disabilities means the maximum-potential promise isn't landing the same way for every group on campus. That doesn't erase the strong aggregate numbers — a school can be genuinely strong for most students and still have real work to do for a specific subgroup, and both things are true here at once. What the record can't tell us is which grades or classrooms carry that gap, or what specific supports are in place for those students right now. That's the single most useful question to bring to a campus visit if it applies to your child.

Staffing is a mixed but not alarming picture: teachers average 15.1 years of experience and are 100% fully credentialed [staff], a genuinely veteran, qualified team. Nearly one in five teachers, though, is in their first year. That reflects this year's hiring conditions. It's worth knowing which grade that applies to if you're choosing a specific classroom placement.

A few smaller details round out the picture. Per-pupil spending, at $20,024, runs below the state average of $23,518 [finance]. The strong outcomes above happened without outspending the state, which says something about how the school uses what it has, though it's context rather than a score either way. Grade 3 ELA is the weakest tested grade-subject at 79.0% met or exceeded, against grade 4 math's 82.9%. That's a gap between grades in the same year rather than a multi-year trend, though it's relevant if your child is entering third grade specifically. Chronic absenteeism sits at 18.4% [absence], alongside that near-zero suspension rate. Kids aren't being pushed out of this campus, but a real share of students are still missing meaningful school time for reasons the record doesn't specify.

The school has six recorded feeder schools [feeders], though the record only gives a count, not which schools or what they're like — a district office call would fill that gap. Between the subgroup gap, the first-year teacher share, and the absenteeism number, there's a consistent theme here worth naming directly on a tour: ask which students the strong aggregate numbers describe, and which ones they don't yet.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
54.8%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 82th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-1.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 62th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
80.7%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 79th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.4%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 49th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36245%34%18%3%79%+36
Grade 47060%21%11%7%81%+37
Grade 55850%29%17%3%79%+31
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36261%21%10%8%82%+37
Grade 47056%27%13%4%83%+41
Grade 55857%22%9%12%79%+44
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/115836%28%34%2%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged2360.9%+20+23
White10580.0%+11+18
Two or More Races3485.3%+24+24
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Kenter Canyon Elementary Charter ←7754.8%80.7%−1.30.1%
Franklin Elementary2.1 mi8357.7%83.5%+3.70.3%
Community Magnet Charter Elementary1.7 mi8059.6%84.3%−13.50.1%
Canyon Charter Elementary3 mi8061.1%85.6%+6.10.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197896#22558.1%83.5%8.1%0.0%-3.8pp
20228299#6654.6%80.3%12.4%0.0%+4.3pp
20238999#3360.0%81.6%18.2%0.0%+10.9pp
20248398#8857.0%82.9%10.7%0.1%-4.8pp
20257796#23854.8%80.7%18.4%0.1%-1.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.1%17.4%+11.3pp
Male9.7%19.5%+9.8pp
Asian8.7%11.1%+2.4pp
Hispanic/Latino13.2%41.5%+28.3pp
Two or More Races3.2%14.0%+10.8pp
Students with Disabilities10.0%27.3%+17.3pp
English Learners21.1%30.4%+9.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.3%36.1%+27.8pp
All Students8.0%18.4%+10.4pp
Filipino17.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction