ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
John Knight Middle · Dixon

John Knight Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

John Knight posts 24% meeting the standard and 6.6% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

455 East A Street, 95620 (opens in new tab)·Dixon Unified·Dixon·Grades 6-8·634 students·69% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(707) 693-6350·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3443
% Exceeded7%17%
% Met+24%39%
Growth+11.1+1.5
Absence27.0%18.5%
Suspension12.6%3.7%
Scope Score
34
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,521 statewide

John Knight Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 32nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. John Knight deserves a closer read. The school sits in Dixon, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 57th to the 32nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 24% meet the standard today, versus 33% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 628%20%19%33%19%
Grade 741%26%29%32%31%
Grade 837%32%33%35%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 617%16%18%18%19%
Grade 731%8%22%17%18%
Grade 844%24%24%26%28%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

14%
81%
Grade 6 · 19% proficient
8%
23%
69%
Grade 7 · 31% proficient
27%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 12.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.6%
State 16.8%
10.2pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+11.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
24.3%
State 39.3%
15.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
27.0%
State 18.5%
8.5pp above state avg
Suspension rate
12.6%
State 3.7%
8.9pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
20.4%
State 18.0%
2.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At John Knight Middle in Dixon, 23.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Knight Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 431 students tested.

All students at this school: 24% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 24%, district —, state 39%24%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 21%, district 24%, state 32%21% · −3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 24%, state 32%23% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 21%, district 26%, state 42%21% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 28%, district 31%, state 44%28% · +4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 27%, district 34%, state 56%27% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 8%, state 11%5% · −19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 7%, state 15%6% · −18 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 23%, district 29%, state 46%23% · −1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 25%, district 30%, state 56%25% · +0 vs school

6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 13.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +13.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 27.0%, district 24.8%, state 18.5%27.0% · +8.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 12.6%, district —, state 3.7%12.6% · +8.9pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (30.6% vs 20.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.3%
Grades 7–830.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 25:124:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience9.7 years
Fully credentialed71%
First-year teachers24%
Intern / emergency permit3.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$51,660 – $103,865
Principal salary$123,101 – $138,956
Superintendent salary$256,582

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $14,380, CA average $14,815$14,380 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$706 per student

$706 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,557 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support9%
Student services8%
Administration13%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,363 per pupil
2019$11,723 per pupil
2018$12,277 per pupil
2017$9,814 per pupil
2016$9,811 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic63.6%
District 59.3% · CA 56.1%
White23.5%
District 26.4% · CA 19.9%
Other9.2%
District 10.7% · CA 9.0%
Black2.8%
District 2.2% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.9%
District 1.4% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 69.4% (6pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$620K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+24% · CA 35%
ZIP population22,223
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is John Knight Middle a good middle school?

John Knight Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 32nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,521 statewide. 6.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.2 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are John Knight Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 24.3% of students at John Knight Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,232 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does John Knight Middle rank in California?

John Knight Middle ranks #1,521 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 32nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is John Knight Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at John Knight Middle increases by 11.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at John Knight Middle?

27.0% of students at John Knight Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 12.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does John Knight Middle compare to other schools in Dixon?

John Knight Middle scores 34/100 (32nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 634 students. Use the schools in Dixon page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does John Knight Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At John Knight Middle in Dixon, 23.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Knight Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 431 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
6.6%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 39th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+11.1pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
24.3%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 38th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
27.0%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 38th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
12.6%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 14th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
20.4%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 49th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62105%14%30%50%19%−28
Grade 72038%23%29%41%31%−17
Grade 82034%27%25%44%32%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62108%11%26%55%19%−16
Grade 72043%14%25%58%18%−16
Grade 820211%17%30%42%28%−4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112044%16%61%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged43123.0%−4−15
Hispanic/Latino39125.1%−2−14
White14030.0%−9−32
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
John Knight Middle ←346.6%24.3%+11.112.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194157#86310.3%32.8%11.2%16.2%+17.7pp
20223032#14705.7%21.0%35.6%14.9%+10.3pp
20233741#12906.2%24.1%31.5%12.2%+10.0pp
20243543#12536.1%26.8%31.4%10.6%+5.2pp
20253432#15216.6%24.3%27.0%12.6%+11.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 15 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.4%24.0%+17.6pp
Male15.6%30.0%+14.4pp
Black/African American20.0%33.3%+13.3pp
Filipino37.5%23.1%-14.4pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino9.5%26.7%+17.2pp
Two or More Races4.5%38.5%+34.0pp
Students with Disabilities23.8%35.1%+11.3pp
English Learners13.1%32.3%+19.2pp
Homeless14.6%25.9%+11.3pp
Military-Connected7.7%15.4%+7.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.8%29.6%+14.8pp
All Students11.2%27.2%+16.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction