ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Grant Elementary · San Jose

Grant Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Grant posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

470 East Jackson Street, 95112 (opens in new tab)·San Jose Unified·San Jose·Grades TK-5·383 students·70% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 535-6227
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2445
% Exceeded3%21%
% Met+11%43%
Growth-5.2-2.9
Absence29.4%17.9%
Suspension3.9%1.6%
Scope Score
24
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,365 statewide · #24 of 27 in San Jose Unified

Grant Elementary scores 24 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 7th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “11% proficient” and call it done. Grant deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 31st to the 7th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 11% meet the standard today, versus 24% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 324%15%15%13%19%
Grade 426%21%20%15%5%
Grade 537%26%11%14%17%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 320%8%19%14%14%
Grade 414%22%13%14%6%
Grade 521%15%14%2%6%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
81%
Grade 3 · 19% proficient
95%
Grade 4 · 5% proficient
11%
83%
Grade 5 · 17% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.4%
State 21.3%
17.9pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-5.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
11.2%
State 42.7%
31.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
29.4%
State 17.9%
11.5pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.9%
State 1.6%
2.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.0%
State 18.0%
8.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Grant Elementary in San Jose, 9.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 17.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (13.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 139 students tested.

All students at this school: 11% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 11%, district —, state 43%11%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 11%, district 25%, state 32%11% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 8%, district 22%, state 32%8% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 11%, district 45%, state 42%11% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 10%, district 46%, state 44%10% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 7%, state 11%3% · −9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 3%, district 16%, state 15%3% · −8 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 29.4%, district 24.3%, state 17.9%29.4% · +11.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.9%, district —, state 1.6%3.9% · +2.3pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (42.2% vs 23.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–623.0%
TK/K42.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 21:118:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience13.4 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers10%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,000 – $134,400
Principal salary$146,301 – $163,630
Superintendent salary$354,153

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,363, CA average $14,815$24,363 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,739 per student

$1,739 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,059 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,878 per pupil
2019$12,931 per pupil
2018$12,414 per pupil
2017$11,570 per pupil
2016$11,975 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic83.8%
District 54.0% · CA 56.1%
Other6.3%
District 9.5% · CA 9.0%
White3.7%
District 20.2% · CA 19.9%
Asian3.7%
District 14.1% · CA 10.2%
Black2.6%
District 2.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 69.7% (6pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$89K · CA $85K
Median home value$974K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population57,373
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grant Elementary a good elementary school?

Grant Elementary has a Scope Score of 24 out of 100, placing it in the 7th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,365 statewide. 3.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 17.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Grant Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 11.2% of students at Grant Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 7.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 371 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Grant Elementary rank in California?

Grant Elementary ranks #5,365 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 7th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Grant Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Grant Elementary decreases by 5.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Grant Elementary?

29.4% of students at Grant Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Grant Elementary compare to other schools in San Jose?

Grant Elementary scores 24/100 (7th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 383 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Grant Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Grant Elementary in San Jose, 9.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 17.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (13.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 139 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
3.4%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 33th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-5.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
11.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 26th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
29.4%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 31th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.9%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 31th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 39th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3697%12%23%58%19%−25
Grade 4632%3%19%76%5%−40
Grade 5536%11%21%62%17%−31
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3706%9%21%64%14%−31
Grade 4640%6%22%72%6%−35
Grade 5520%6%25%69%6%−30
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11540%9%54%37%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1399.4%−17−29
Hispanic/Latino16613.3%−17−26
English Learners741.4%−5−9
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Grant Elementary ←243.4%11.2%−5.23.9%
Alpha: Cornerstone Academy Preparatory2.7 mi6536.2%59.9%+18.10.5%
Rocketship Discovery Prep1 mi6331.5%50.0%+8.70.1%
Vinci Park Elementary2.2 mi6039.8%66.9%−13.80.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193531#38215.4%23.6%15.3%2.9%+7.0pp
20223136#36964.8%18.1%45.6%1.0%+8.6pp
20232411#51142.9%15.2%36.1%1.7%-4.2pp
2024172#56282.7%12.0%33.9%5.6%-6.2pp
2025247#53653.4%11.2%29.4%3.9%-5.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 29 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.7%26.8%+11.1pp
Male15.1%33.3%+18.2pp
Asian6.3%21.4%+15.1pp
Hispanic/Latino16.4%30.5%+14.1pp
Students with Disabilities19.2%31.9%+12.7pp
English Learners13.1%23.1%+10.0pp
Homeless72.7%83.3%+10.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.2%32.6%+16.4pp
All Students15.4%30.3%+14.9pp
Black/African American46.2%
Two or More Races31.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction