ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics · Los Angeles

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics posts 22% meeting the standard and 8.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded8%21%
% Met+22%43%
Growth+5.5-2.9
Absence28.8%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
35
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #4,029 statewide · #481 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 30th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “22% proficient” and call it done. Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics deserves a closer read. It sits at the 30th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 30th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 22% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 318%22%13%20%20%
Grade 433%21%21%21%31%
Grade 528%19%14%11%31%
Grade 626%16%24%27%19%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 324%20%19%19%13%
Grade 423%13%19%18%27%
Grade 59%3%5%5%13%
Grade 610%5%10%8%6%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

9%
11%
80%
Grade 3 · 20% proficient
15%
15%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
10%
21%
69%
Grade 5 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 11.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
8.3%
State 21.3%
13.0pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+5.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
22.4%
State 42.7%
20.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
28.8%
State 17.9%
10.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
10.3%
State 18.0%
7.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics in Los Angeles, 25.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics trails its district average for low-income students by 15.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (15.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 233 students tested.

All students at this school: 21% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 21%, district —, state 43%21%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 36%, state 32%20% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 22%, district 36%, state 32%22% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 21%, district 41%, state 42%21% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 20%, district 42%, state 44%20% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 9%, state 11%2% · −19 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 12%, district 30%, state 26%12% · −9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 19%, district 14%, state 15%19% · −1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 8.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 28.8%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%28.8% · +10.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–627.3%
TK/K38.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff23 teachers
Avg. experience10.7 years
Fully credentialed64%
First-year teachers17%
Intern / emergency permit9.1%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,246, CA average $14,815$26,246 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,929 per student

$2,929 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic83.5%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Black11.0%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other4.7%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
White0.8%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$53K · CA $85K
Median home value$614K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+12% · CA 35%
ZIP population94,830
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 12% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics a good elementary school?

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 30th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,029 statewide. 8.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.0 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 22.4% of students at Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 425 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics rank in California?

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics ranks #4,029 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 30th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics increases by 5.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics?

28.8% of students at Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics scores 35/100 (30th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics in Los Angeles, 25.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics trails its district average for low-income students by 15.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (15.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 233 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
8.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 37th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+5.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 56th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
22.4%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 35th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
28.8%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 32th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
10.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3769%11%8%72%20%−24
Grade 45915%15%17%53%31%−14
Grade 57710%21%10%58%31%−17
Grade 6320%19%25%56%19%−28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3765%8%11%76%13%−33
Grade 4598%19%34%39%27%−14
Grade 5781%12%19%68%13%−22
Grade 6326%0%19%75%6%−29
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11783%9%54%35%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged23325.3%−16−13
Hispanic/Latino20226.7%−14−12
English Learners842.4%−5−8
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics ←358.3%22.4%+5.50.1%
Sixty-First Street Elementary0.7 mi6118.8%38.5%−3.70.4%
West Vernon Avenue Elementary2 mi5719.1%41.8%+5.90.1%
New Heights Charter2.8 mi5218.1%35.9%−9.30.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193223#42377.6%22.6%25.0%0.0%-2.7pp
2022174#54946.6%16.2%66.4%0.0%-10.0pp
2023194#54675.0%15.3%45.7%0.2%-6.1pp
2024215#54655.1%15.6%31.9%0.1%-11.6pp
20253530#40298.3%22.4%28.8%0.1%+5.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female24.6%25.7%+1.1pp
Male25.7%33.3%+7.6pp
Black/African American39.2%47.1%+7.9pp
Hispanic/Latino22.6%26.6%+4.0pp
Students with Disabilities30.3%37.9%+7.6pp
English Learners20.2%24.1%+3.9pp
Foster Youth0.0%
Homeless28.6%46.7%+18.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged25.5%30.1%+4.6pp
All Students25.2%29.6%+4.4pp
Filipino35.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction